Heilong River Zoring retired police officers suspected of usurping foreign corporate assets

Koo Sung-Hing was a police officer of the Ziang City Public Security Bureau and has retired.

The foreign firm San Fawhua Investment Company, Heilongjiang Province (hereinafter referred to as “Stand Fawhua Company”), despite having received an Administrative Review Decision issued by the Zanhui Municipality in May 2024 confirming that the transfer of the land to Kao Sung Xing in that year was “in violation of the law”, the real situation remains as grave as the end:

Land cannot be recovered and the project has been transformed, with 150 million yuan in base compensation not only for the original investor but also for the sum of $9.506 million in compensation awarded in the first instance civil judgement in the case of Kao Sung-Hing, Zealizing Haihing Real Estate Investment Ltd. (hereinafter “Hae-Hing Company”).

• Zelig City Public Security Bureau. Liu Tiger, take it.

01

“First Business Project” by a prominent actor on a bridging basis*

On the northern side of the Zanan city, on the northern side of the Yellow River, the landmark building, once planned as the “Zanishing of the King's Palace”, the “Zanishing of the Saint-Fouhua Commercial and Trade Centre (Saloon City)” has now been renamed the “Chong Spring” shopping mall. For the local population, this is a vibrant business centre; But for the shareholders of St. Fawfa, the building was a huge, unconstructed wound.

The story began in 2005.

That year, in response to a call for business from the Ziang city government, a Beijing businessman, Liu Hong-hye, and with the funds of shareholders such as the Beijing Dahinghua Realty Group and the Beijing Heidelford Realty Development Company, registered as a company in San Fowa, under the auspices of the famous Zhang Xueian actor, Ko Zhenhai.

“We are the first business-in-investment project in the Zoran city. According to Liu Hong-hye wife, Chen Sook-sook, the then Secretary of the Zelig City Council, Ho Chi-young, and the mayor of the city, Shayan, placed great hopes in the project and in the city centre to create a commercial neighbourhood similar to the Beijing Palace.

Yet, there is an insurmountable gap between ideals and reality — a divide that is broken. The fury, not the clean, gives them a lot of trouble.

“Lao Quang-swee looked at it and said it was not as small as a street in one of our towns. But that's really the center of the Zorin city. "Sook Sook is back. For this “city” company, St. Louis’s company has been in a demolition and saw-saw war for eight years.

Since 2006, the work has been intermittent and continued until 2013.

(a) Statistics from St. Fowler ' s financial statistics show that the company invested a large amount of upfront inputs during this period: $7.23 million in land concessions in November 2005; (a) Compensation of $30 million for demolition and relocation and $500,000 for services paid to the City of Zimbabwe for housing demolition and relocation; The government has also paid $30 million to the Municipality of Zimbabwe to pay compensation for the demolition and relocation. With Liu Hong-Wei personally providing more than 2 million yuan to build the local garden in the centre of the city, the previous period had invested more than 70 million yuan.

• Quest the landmarks: formerly the “Choose City”, now the “Choose Spring”. Liu Tiger, take it.

“The Government leadership says that our government has no money to demolish; Saint-Foufa is obliged to pay the Government for the project and to pay for it in the future. "Sook-sook-sook-sook-sook mentioned in his oral statement.

Long-term financial pressures and the dismantling of the hardship have ultimately brought down Liu Qianjin's body. In 2013, Liu was sick when the demolition was finally nearing its end, when the land was about to become “clean”.

In order to preserve the project and to find a way for the company to live, Liu Quang-Sei signed a Cooperation Agreement and Supplementary Agreement with Hai-hyun, a powerful local prop known as the San Francisco Commercial Centre (Santa Fua) on 9 September 2013.

Hae-hyun ' s background is not simple, and the actual control is Kao Sung-hyung, a police officer of the Public Security Bureau. Kao Sung-hyung himself, his wife Zhao Guo-Su and her female Bing-joo were legal representatives of the company. Kao Sung-Hing now owns 40 per cent of the shares of Hai-hyun and has many other businesses.

The 2013 agreement was considered to be Liu Hong-Wei's “Tol-lover” on the eve of his death. The agreement provided for the entry of Hai-hyun into the Bureau, which was responsible for the follow-up of the investment and development of funds, with the parties having a proportional share (52 per cent in Saint-Fauhua and 48 per cent in Hai-hyun). More importantly, the agreement establishes a “deposit mechanism”: “At the time of the project's formal start, A (St. Fowfa) agreed to transfer all shares held and interests at a transfer fee of not less than $150 million. The blogger adds:

The sum of $150 million, the bottom line of Liu Hong-Wei ' s eight-year heart work, and his last guarantee for his wife and children and shareholders.

However, he did not wait for the money. On 1 February 2014, at the beginning of the Year, Liu Quang-ye died of illness. With the death of the core, this was a fast-tracking cooperation based on mutual commercial trust.

02

Unreciprocal agreements on behalf of mothers are used by deceased legal persons

After Liu Hong-hye's death, Ko Sung-hyun was able to reach out to Liu Qing, the old mother of nearly eight years of wisdom.

According to Chen Sook-sook and the company's old employees, “Wing Jing was somewhat stimulated in the city of Mangjie and was diagnosed by the hospital a few years ago as having high-risk cognitive disorders”.

• The Natural Resources Bureau of the Municipality of Zolin. Liu Tiger, take it.

In March 2014, Liu Hong-hye died for just one month, and a series of tumultuous business changes took place.

On 20 March, Kao Sung-hyeung and Li Jian, then Chief of the Business Registration Section of the Zelig City Business Administration, changed the legal representative of St. Faw Corporation from the late Liu Hong-hye to Wang Jing by false material (withdrawn on 7 May).

Only three days later (23 March

1. and seven days later (27 March 2014), Wang Jing, who has become a “legal representative”, signed two agreements on the overall transfer of the project for the ration of the St. Fortune Business Centre (Court of Food) between St. Fawfa and Hae-hyung, Kao, respectively.

New agreements of disequilibria have become the source of all the ensuing disputes. It completely abrogated the Liu Hong-hye agreement of 2013 “150 million insulation” and transferred the project as a whole to Hein Hing, while the transfer fee clause became vague, agreeing only “to double the total amount of the prior period inputs” and without a specific amount.

According to Saint-Fauhua, Kao Sung-hyung has replaced the original 2013 assignment agreement (150 million) with a clear value by illegally changing the legal person and a new agreement with vague amounts and settlement criteria under his control. This is the core of his "scrutinizing" approach.

• The Northern Forest District Prosecutor ' s Office in Zimbabwe. Liu Tiger, take it.

However, this “power grab” is not a seamless one. Other shareholders in St. Fowfa ' s promptly filed a complaint with the Zeliging City Business Bureau, stating that the change in legal persons had raised the issue of submitting false material.

On 7 May 2014, the Ziang City Business and Industry Board, after an investigation, took an administrative decision to withdraw Wang Jing ' s legal representative from the register of change and restore the legal person to Liu Hong-sei (deceased).

According to Saint-Fuhua, since the change of legal persons has been administratively revoked, it means that the change has been null and void since its inception, the agreement signed by Wang Jing during his illegal status is “not entitled to dispose of” and Haiyan, as a deep participant, is not in line with the principle of “good third parties”.

But Kao Sung-Hing still holds the agreement signed by Wang Jing, which opens the way for a more alarming “mixed transfer of assets”.

03

Land change registration was confirmed as illegal by the Government*

On 29 September 2015, after Wang Jing ' s legal personality was revoked in May 2014, the legal entity of St. Faw ' s was again changed to Wang Jing, under the complicity of Kao Sung Xing and Li Jian. On 25 July 2016, the change was again revoked after administrative review. During the illegal change, Kao Ying Xing Xing forged information and transferred land use rights to the central asset of the St. Louis Company, the Food and Economics Corporation, to Hai Xing Company, a legal person whose daughter is Kao Xing Keong Zhui.

On 1 February 2016, Haishing applied to the original Zoran City Land Resources Authority for a change of land tenure. The application remains the assignment agreement signed by Wang Jing in March 2014.

In its letter of submission, St. Fowfa ' s stated that the original State Land Use Certificate had been in the company ' s hands and had never been lost, but that Hesing had “hidden the original land certificate in the name of the applicant” and applied for a new certificate, which was subsequently changed.

St. Faw’s is more surprised by the presence of agents in the process. The file shows that the power of attorney for land change is represented by " Wang Yingqi " and " Lee Jingming " by Heising.

• Zolin City North Forest District Court. Liu Tiger, take it.

St. Fawfa stated in court that: “Wing Inge was dismissed in 2014 and was not an employee of the company, and his official seal on the power of attorney was allegedly forged. The official who represents Hei-hyun is a public official of the City Business Bureau of Zoran.

This series of operations was not discovered until 2023, when St. Fawfa Inc. applied for public information. In response to land change, the company St. Fortune applied to the Municipality of Zion for administrative review.

On 9 May 2024, the Zoran Municipality issued the Decision on Administrative Review (Zoran Retroactivity [2024] 13). This decision document is the key evidence for the curtains of the day. The decision clearly sets out three main violations of the law in the original Zolin City Land and Resources Authority when it made the change:

First, there was a violation of the time limit. The transfer agreement was signed on 27 March 2014, but the application for change was made on 1 February 2016, well above the statutory requirement of “application within 30 days of signature”.

Second, the formalities were incomplete, the materials were missing and there was no information on land changes required, such as cadastral questionnaires.

Third, the public announcement procedure was not performed. Such changes are subject to public notice under the relevant legislation, but not by the original Land Office.

On this basis, the Municipality of Zorinization has made a clear review decision: “ Confirms that the applicant's change of title to the State Land Use Certificate No. 00104 (2006) was unlawful. ”

This should have been the victory of St. Fowler. However, the latter part of the decision book left Chen Suk-qing and others desperate. The decision states that the revocation of the administrative act “would entail substantial harm to the national interest and the public interest” and that “the organ shall not revoke the administrative act”.

• Reconfirmation of the content of the Municipal Council's Decision on Administrative Reviews, No. Interviewees

And another reason is more realistic: the Food and Foodstuffs Project has built the current "Climate Spring" with the presence of merchants, the building being up and the canoe being made.

“It is illegal, but it is not. Take it away, it's him. This is the administrative situation facing St. Fowler.

04

Victim sentenced to “back-up” 95 million *

The loss of land and the failure to obtain 150 million transfers are not the worst results.

In 2022, Heinch brought a case (case No. (2022) No. 1202 Black No.

1. before the North Forest District Court of the Zelig city, bringing St. Fawfa ' s case before the court. Haichen stated that after taking over the “Court of Food” project, it incurred significant additional costs to relocate the remaining 17 families. Although the transfer agreement does not mention this, St. Fawfa, as the original removee, should bear the burden of the money.

The proceedings were filled with a “unequal” race from the outset.

In the course of the case, St. Faw ' s has repeatedly challenged and applied for jurisdiction, recusal of personnel and the addition of a third person, and has tried to correct the skewed balance, without exception, all of which has been frustrated:

1. Avoidance application and identity “redressing”

The most disturbing thing for St. Fawfa is the Kung-hing sitting on the table.

In its Opinion on Kao Sung-Hing as Agent, which was submitted to the Court, the company stated that after the indictment, Hae-hing had urgently changed its legal representative and that Kao-sung had instead appeared as an “employee”. For its part, St. Faw ' s view is that the presence of Kao Sung Heung as a retired cadre of the Public Security Bureau of the Zancheng City, who has a natural link with the Northern Forest District Court, which is part of the system of constitutional law, may lead to unfairness in the proceedings.

The “silver and tungsten” complex developed by St. Louis is now scarcely consumed. Liu Tiger, take it.

In addition, St. Fowfa is also applying for disqualification from Judge Pang Wenxing, a member of the Full Court. St. Fowler mentioned that Pong-hyun had handed down a judgement against the real stakeholders in another related case, which was subsequently remanded to the court and revised.

During the counter-claims in the present case, Pang was also absent on the grounds that he was in session “in the absence of a judge and a juror during the investigation and the presentation of evidence in the court of the case”.

In view of the fact that the Northern Forest District Court has in previous related cases “allowing two parties to the same accused” and “the reasons for the decision contradicted the High Court's decision”, St. Fortelle also requested that the entire trial committee of the Northern Forest District Court recuse itself and that the case be referred to the Intermediate Municipal Court of Zion. However, none of these requests for disqualification was granted.

2) Jurisdiction left behind and rejected third persons

The Application for Jurisdictional Objection filed by St. Fowler was also rejected. The St. Fawers argued that the subject matter of the case was large (over 250 million) and that the main shareholders were in Beijing and should be heard by the Zioning Central Court, on the basis of the principle of hierarchy and continuity of jurisdiction. However, the case was eventually left in the Northern Forest District Court.

St. Fawfa's premises were now a kindergarten. Liu Tiger, take it.

In the crucial part of the fact-finding process, the Court ex officio added 17 additional expropriations as third persons, but rejected the Additional Third Persons Application submitted by St. Fawfa. St. Fawfa's application for additional funds was for Wang Qing, the key person in the year that signed the transfer agreement. According to the Saint-Fauhua side, Wang Jing is both a signatory and a payee, more relevant than 17 families who have moved back home and is key to the truth. But this request is equally overwhelming.

During the first instance hearing of the case, the Court of Ko Cheng Hein had provided “receipts” for a number of cash payments to Wang Jing, claiming that one day he had taken $15 million in cash to Wang Jing himself. For its part, St. Faw ' s view was that Wang Qing ' s cooperation in the registration of changes and the signing of agreements, at the temptation of interests, had led to the transfer of the company ' s core assets.

At the first instance hearing, Wang Jing stated that “it was not known what he had signed, but only the last page. Ko Sung-Hing brought in a blank contract, and told her that it would be in your interest to sign and pay you double the amount of the input. Today, Wang Jing has joined the charges against Kao Sung-hyung.

The first instance verdict was devastating for St. Fowler. In its judgement, the North Forest District Court established a complete set of logical closed loops that supported most of the Haiyan claims:

With regard to the validity of the agreement, the Court, citing the Notice of the Supreme People's Court for the Publication of the Proceedings of the National Civil and Commercial Trials of the Court, held that although the Seal stamp of the Wang Qing may not have been a record, she was in title and was a legal representative and that Hae-hing had actually taken over the project and invested funds, and that Saint-Foufa had subsequently accepted part of the amount (note: the sum of money that Hai-hyun had entered the Wang Qing's personal account), and therefore found that the “Stamp of the record” had been established and the agreement valid.

With respect to transfer fees, the court found that Helsing had paid over $7.63 million in the transfer and had paid in full. The accounts included “over $21.18 million to Wang Jing” and the $30 million in demolition money which Hein Hing claimed to “pay on his behalf”. As for the $150 million agreement advocated by St. Fowfast, the court considered it to have been annulled by the 2014 agreement.

St. Fawfa’s company now has only one narrow office and five employees on the street. Liu Tiger, take it.

With regard to the loss of return, the Court accepted the settlement agreement unilaterally offered by Hein, which had found that Hein had suffered substantial losses in order to resolve the legacy of St. Fawfa, which constituted “no-cause management” or “substitute performance”. Finally, the court ruled that St. Fawfa had awarded Haihing a loss of over $9.506 million for the return of the company; The entire counterclaim of St. Fowler ' s was also dismissed.

"This is what we eat and we're gonna use our bones to squeeze oil! The ruling was a very angry one when Chen Sook-hyun spoke about it. She noted that many of the signatories, such as Fan Zhigang, Kohund, were actually members of Heinz's internal staff or relatives, were suspected of “prove themselves” and that many agreements were not invoiced, based on receipts and white bars, but were accepted by the courts.

05

Police “ 300 million dollars assets*”*

In a long-standing litigation game, St. Fowler began to dig into the background of Ko Sung-hing and submitted detailed letters of complaint to the relevant authorities. In the letter, St. Fortune, which refers to Kao Sung-Hing as using his public security status, built a vast commercial empire where Kao-Hing and his relatives (wife Zhao Guo-su, daughter Ko Wing-chiao, etc.) controlled over a dozen companies, including the Hung-Le Valley building materials in Shandong and the Sheilong River Sung-da Pastoral Industries, with over 100 million registered capital.

The letter also refers in particular to Ko Sung-hyun, who is known as his son-in-law, Wu Xiaoqii, “is currently President of the Beijing High People's Court for the Implementation of the Second Chamber” and owns a number of properties in Beijing, Hainan and elsewhere.

Today, St. Fawfa is faced with a situation where land has been recognized by the Government as being subject to unlawful changes but cannot be recovered; The project was transferred, not only without 150 million, but with a debt judgement of nearly 100 million dollars; The remaining assets were also seized by the Kao Ying-heung side through means of property preservation.

The Court of the Northern Forest has appealed the decision of the first instance, and the Zanhua Court has now remanded the case. According to St. Fowfa ' s, when Wang Jing signed the transfer agreement on 23 March 2014 and 27 March 2014, his legal representative was revoked, and he was not entitled to represent him, and the agreement should be null and void. At the same time, Haichen did not pay the real transfer price, and the so-called “loss of return” was based on false evidence.

Heilongang Provincial High Court. One case before the North Forest District Court was found to be contrary to the Court ' s judgement. Liu Tiger, take it.

According to Saint-Fuhua, * * Based on current market prices, the assets of the company owned by Kao Sung-Hing are * high * * up to * 3 Billion. “Please ask, as a police officer who retires early, where are the billions of dollars to build a commercial empire after another? The blogger adds:

According to St. Fowers, Haiheng collected arrears from the personal accounts of several employees of the company for tax evasion and evasion, “Other companies used their personal bank accounts to collect $10 million on 24 June 2016 for the laundering of the money by Kao Sung. Kao Sung-hing was taken away in 2019 for issues such as the case of Fanyu, a national anti-blackhouse executive (501 special case), and later released a month later, after being operating at great expense by Kao-hing and his family. Kao Xing Xing has repeatedly publicly threatened to report that he has extensive connections in the area of pacifying public prosecution laws, such as the complainant and his agents who dare to placate and are held in police stations for 10 and a half days! The blogger adds:

Media coverage of a crime involving Kao Sung-Hing. Web page screenshot

The author found that in November 2025, a report in Red Star News revealed that Kao Sung-Hing had not been identified as a black-off in a case involving a black-off and that the $10 million in investment funds seized had been included in the execution property of Li Zhijun ' s sentence. (a) The case of Ko Sung Heng ' s mob fight was eventually dismissed in May 2022 by the Northwood branch of the Zoran City Public Security Bureau, where Ka Sung Heng was acquitted and the Anda City Public Security Directorate paid over $16,000 in damages for the violation of Kao Sung Heng ' s personal liberty; The Public Security Bureau of Anda city apologizes for the removal of the impact, restoration of the reputation and compensation.

06

Assets paid in lieu of subrogation proceedings and over-compensation

“Kol Sung-Hing's nephew is also Deputy Director of the Permanent Committee of the Zeliging City People's Congress. “St. Fowers said that if the “light-speed transfer” of the land certificates was a direct act of looting, then the series of “substitutes proceedings” subsequently initiated by Kao Sung Heng was more like a precise clean-up of the remaining assets of St. Fowers, using a deep network of judicial relations that ignored the facts.

In the series (2021) of cases such as No. 3226 of the 1202-minority, Kao Sung-hyun, Chen Yubo (public official of the Zelig Market Supervision Authority) and others, using the partnership of St. Fowfa and the third party, Heilong Jiang Jinhong Construction Engineering Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Kinhong”) by court decision, forced the company “Dai” of St. Faw's to pay its debts. This series of operations is not only procedurally biased, but is also flawed in the most basic logic of the establishment of claims.

1. Non-construction of base claim: illegal transfer of obligation to contribute

Substitutes are established on the premise that Saint-Fauhua (sub-debtor) owes the company Jinhong money. However, according to the Cooperation Agreement for the Public Service Building Project signed by the parties, Saint-Fouhua, as party A, only had land and 25 per cent of the shares, while Jin-hong, as party B, had 75 per cent of the shares, and had expressly agreed that all equipment, materials and construction costs for the works would be the responsibility of party B (Kinhong).

“The works were supposed to be made by Jinhong, and St. Fowfa is not in debt to Jinhong. “St. Fowers noted that the court decision forced the internal financing obligations of the company to be converted into St. Fowers' external debt. This practice of wiping out contractual “juss” led to the complete collapse of the basis of subrogation.

2. Logical reverse: the amount awarded is twice the value of the asset

Even under the wrong logic, the amount of the judgement is excessive.

The complaint material indicates that the “service building” project involved was judicially assessed at a value of $81.4 million. The asset was eventually repaid to Kao Sung-hing at a price of over $435.4 million as a result of the auction. However, the Northern Forest District Court awarded Saint-Foufaah subrogation responsibility for the principal and interest amounts of over $6,831,000 (up to over $9,337 million at the time of the second trial).

Zelig City Service Building. Liu Tiger, take it.

“Substitutes are essentially a transfer of claims, not the creation of debt. In legal terms, even if Saint-Fuerfa needs to pay the debt, the ceilings to be assumed should not exceed the actual profits that are available to the company in the project.

However, the paper was challenged as “a miscarriage of justice in the context of judicial relations”, which not only made St. Fowler pay for the entire building, but also plunged it into a ridiculous situation of “billion dollar back”. This logical reversal of the ruling has evolved into a surprising recovery of assets during the implementation phase: St. Fawfa assessed the properties worth more than $130 million, and after a re-shoot was evaluated 56 per cent (about $60 million) of the price, which was paid to Kao Sung-Hing, Chen Yubo, and to the individual.

After the imposition of the billions, the Kwok Party has not stopped and is now in a new round of implementation, focusing on another site under St. Louis, which is assessing the unexperienced properties worth more than $40 million. According to the Saint-Fauthian side, this is no longer a normal legal defence, but rather a complete settlement of a foreign investment company under the “guardian” of the judicial power, by deliberately lowering the combination of value for asset assessment and over-the-counter awards, which has left the company in debt and insoluble.

The Court has experienced a significant further deviation in the calculation of interest on execution involving large sums of money. In response to a serious error in the calculation of interest resulting in a maliciously magnified debt, St. Fortelle filed an application for enforcement challenge with the North Forest District Court in April

1. However, in the face of this legitimate request for correction, the Court gave a funny reason: “The relevant complaint material has been lost” and thus refused to open the case.

In October 2025, the company St. Fowfast filed a further application for filing. However, at the time of the publication of this document, the execution challenge, which concerns the life or death of the enterprise, was left pending in the so-called “audit” procedure, without a case being filed, without an answer or being processed.

From the calculation of the incorrect interest to the “floating” file, to the remote review, the Northern Forest District Court, in a series of operations, appears to be no longer a fair adjudicator but a “late shield” for the implementation of asset clearance by Kao Sung-hyung. Such practices, which artificially create procedural obstacles and obstruct the legitimate channels of relief for businesses, not only wipe out legal dignity, but also discourage foreign investors.

3. “Dual-platform” awards and the debt trap that is not due

In the complaint file, St. Fawfa refers to the Northern Forest District Court and the Zoran Central Court, which have used judicial relations to “slash” during the proceedings:

In the complaint file, St. Fawfa refers to the Northern Forest District Court and the Zanhui Court, which have used judicial relations to “spar” during the proceedings:

At the time of the Haiyan action: the court hastily found the claim to be established and awarded compensation in cases where the amount of the claim has not been verified and settlement is not yet complete.

When St. Fawfa sued Jinhong for settlement of the award, Judge Zhang Yanli, Liu Xiaohong, who was sitting in the same court as the substitute judge, dismissed it on the grounds of “lack of interest in the case”.

Even more absurdly, the claim has not yet matured. The project has not been able to receive and sell as a result of the irregularities in the construction of the company Jinhong and Kao Sung-hyung. In the absence of a return on the sale, the conditions for payment of the works and the dividends were not fulfilled in the circumstances of the agreement.

From the non-revocation of illegal land changes to subrogation over the total amount of assets, St. Fawfa is in the process of appropriating, and a surprising “commercial engravement” is sketched. This is not a simple civil dispute, but rather a family with the resources of a political and legal background, how to use every fine gap in administrative and judicial proceedings to strip an foreign investment enterprise.

At present, St. Fowfa is submitting to the authorities the Roxification of Complaints Document, requesting a retrial in case (2021) No. 3226, etc., of 1202 people.

In a letter to the Inspectorate, St. Fort's company asked its superiors to take note of the case: “The person who reported the incident, using his special status as a member of the public security organs, spent a great deal of money and property, bought a number of judicial and administrative units, such as the courts, the Public Security Bureau and the Natural Resources Department, and corrupted the Government and the judicial environment, causing the population to lose faith in the rule of law, infringe on the vast assets of the whistleblower, request the superiors to exercise their legal oversight and report to the person in a fair manner. The blogger adds:

Nemmon King of Guaco has had 20 hard years to win and to enforce

The court issued investigative orders on several occasions after the Beijing 1 village committee had demolished nearly $200 million of properties and refused to acknowledge them.

Von Long reported that his old men had appropriated $470 million in renovation costs, which was not in line with the Supreme Law Entry into Force decision.

The owner of the civil enterprise was convicted of disposing of his assets and the Deputy Secretary of the Henanichi County Disciplinary Commission was reported to have been embroiled in economic disputes

The Shenyang were sentenced to 10 and a half years for millions of works: “transfer payments” or contract fraud?