The bribed case: late evidence of innocence and three thousand letters of accusation

China Postal Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Postal Savings Bank) Financial Market Department former general manager of the Party has been bribed (see this article: "The former executive of the Postal Savings Bank bribed: the "central game" behind the 7 billion lawsuit is suspected" https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Vf9yG59b16VnuYGjJ_LwCg), the first trial sentence after a few days, the self-denial letter, complaint letter, retention log and prosecution review stage of the guilty confession suddenly appeared in the second trial case.

China Postal Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Postal Savings Bank) former general manager of the financial market department was bribery (see this article: The former executive of the Postal Savings Bank was bribery: 7 billion yuan litigation behind the "central game" question cloud https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/Vf9yG59b16VnuYGjJ_LwCg), a few days after the first trial sentence, the self-denial letter, complaint letter, retention log and prosecution examination stage of the guilty confession suddenly appeared in the second trial case.

Party by chapter. Respondents provided

As of the end of August 2026, Liu Yuan, a family member of the Party's average chapter, in real name, sent more than 3,000 letters of report and complaint to the Central Discipline Commission's State Supervisory Committee, the Provincial and Municipal Discipline Commission's Supervisory Committee, the judicial departments at all levels and the People's Congress and the CPC.

In June, several delegates of the People's Congress submitted a letter to the Discipline Commission and the Supreme Commission of France, requesting the withdrawal of the party-by-party charter, or the designation of a foreign review in Yangzhou or Jiangsu province.

On August 17, after meeting with lawyers and listening to their opinions, the second-instance judge decided to extend the time limit of the case from August 22 to September 22.

For the second trial of the case, the party's claims include: excluding illegal evidence, transferring during detention, synchronous video recording of the conversation area and living area, notifying key witnesses such as Zhu Yuan Wei to appear in court to accept counter-quality and qualitative evidence, designating the case to be re-trialed in a court outside Yangzhou or declaring the whole case innocent.

According to another report in “Financial News”, “Financial News” interviewed two other persons involved in the non-five-million bribes, both of whom denied that they had a petition or money relationship with the party’s committee.”This (referring to the committee’s committee) was written by the party’s committee itself.I met him on the table, completely unfamiliar, not to mention the business, how would it bother me?”

Selling the company to Vancouver owes its 600 million, Chongqing a real estate equity transaction case opened court

Individual money contract verification, Yunnan police officer academy deputy professor convicted of corruption

Hailong Jiangxi retirement police exposed 300 million households: city landmarks become their home property

Hebei police Qunmin case, exposed reporting person paid for the entire period

Why is China's first case of illicit operation of industrial platforms not delayed in trial?

On May 22, the Supreme Court of Jiangsu province accepted the appeal of the Party Parliamentary Constitution and decided to extend the second trial period from August 22 to September 22.

and 01

A financial executive and five bribery charges *

He is 63 years old and has served as general manager of the financial market department of the Postal Reserve Bank and general manager of China Postal Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as China Postal Life).

The public history shows that the party's average chapter entered the financial system in 1986 after graduating from the Chinese department of Shaanxi Master's University, and in 2003 became the governor of Lanzhou Bank, the youngest governor of the country's urban commercial banking system at the time.In 2007, after joining the general bank of the Postal Reserve Bank, he was headed by the Ministry of Risk Management and the Ministry of Financial Markets, directly managing funds in the size of more than 15 trillion yuan.In October 2020, he resigned from the post office.

On the morning of May 10, 2025, the party was detained in the home of Beijing by the Yanzhou Supervisory Commission officers.

On March 16, 2026, the first trial of the Yangzhou Central Chamber was held to hear the suspected bribes of the party.In the trial, the whole case of the party's bribes was not recognized guilty, and the court stated that it had suffered cruel confession, induction, and confession during the detention, in order to detain his wife, interrupt the child's education and threaten, it must be recorded in accordance with the "scenario" "on the mouth" recorded by the case personnel.

Postal Bank Headquarters, Liu Tzu

On April 30, the first-instance judgment of the Yangzhou Central Court determined that from 2014 to 2019, the party's average shareholders made use of the job facilities to provide assistance in business cooperation, project financing and other aspects for the units such as China's Haia Longhuain Asset Management Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as Haia Longhuain), Shanghai银凰 Asset Management Center (hereinafter referred to as Shanghai银凰) etc. In 2013 to 2020, five units received cash, shopping cards and other assets sentenced to Haia Longhuain general manager assistant Huang Wei, Shanghai银凰 actual controller Zhu Super and other five, of which 24,000 yuan were not actually obtained.

In May 2026, the Jiangsu High House accepted the appeal of the Party Equity Chapter.

2nd *

Late evidence of innocence

In July, according to Liu Yan, the wife of the Party’s Jumping Chapter, it was learned that a number of previously unknown volumes of material were “exposed” in the second trial: including the “self-determination letter” written by the Party’s Jumping Chapter during detention, two complaint letters written to the head of the special case, a month’s “determination journal”, daily surveillance logs and drug records, and a note of his innocence at the prosecution stage of prosecution.

Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang Zhang

These materials are not new to the formation. According to the party’s median chapter, his Book of Suicide was written on May 23, 2025, after only thirteen days of detention; two complaints were written on May 19, and July 12, 2025, respectively; and a journal of over a hundred pages.

During the first trial, the lawyer has repeatedly applied to the Yanjiang Prosecutor's Office and the Yanjiang Central Court for the submission of the above materials, and none of the responses of the prosecutor's office were "the materials that could be submitted to the court". The judgment of the first trial rejected the application for the exclusion of illegal evidence on the basis of "no evidence to prove the existence of violence or threat of proof".

This time into the second volume of the material, pointing to the right illegal evidence issue. The "self-defeat book" writes: "I was unreasonably trapped, the case officers were forced to admit 'bribed', became a 'bribed' bribed criminal." "I want to fight with death, and only death to express my innocence, death to revoke my innocence." the second complaint wrote: "The entire process, conversation, the leaders of the interrogation are the director, I am an actor, according to the established script, orderly arranged." "The knowledge material is according to the request to write me worse and worse corrupt modification."

The final statement in the first instance of the Party Constitution was that in order to avoid the risk of his wife and children, he chose to admit the false facts during detention. If again, "I still chose to speak the false words and cooperate, the condition is not to bother my family." At the same time, he reflected that for whatever reason, it is not right for the organization to speak the false words, "I must tell the truth, otherwise I cannot communicate with the family, nor can I see my parents."

03 is

Punishment of debt.

Behind the party-to-party charter, it is highly linked to a targeted $700 million securities fraud liability dispute case.

In 2016, Kunshan Meiji Light Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Meiji) joined Huawei Joint Securities Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as Huawei Securities) and other institutions to issue asset-supported securities (ABS) products. After the product blast in 2018, Postal Securities Bank as the main investor prosecuted claims. The Shanghai Financial Court first judgment determined that the issuance constituted a fraud, ruled that the Bank of Postal Securities won the lawsuit, and received a total of about 700 million yuan, and Huawei Securities bears joint liability for compensation.

After the appeal of the case, the Shanghai High House accepted the case in June

1. during the second trial, the Qatai Securities side held a court investigation order, to the Yangzhou Supervisory Commission obtained information on the Party Constitution case investigation, and submitted it as evidence.

On May 28, 2026, less than a month after the ruling of the first trial of the party-to-party charter, the Shanghai High Court issued a second trial ruling on the Meiji case: the ruling concluded that the actions of the party-to-party charter affected the cause and effect of the transactions involved in the case, "should be based on the surveillance department's investigation and subsequent criminal case results."

The second trial in the Meiji case has decided to suspend the proceedings.

In the view of the defense, the link between the “criminal case providing ammunition for the civil second trial” is exactly the reflection of the intention of the “criminal officers” and the “criminalization of debt” logic: if the criminal establishment of the executives of the Postal Bank was bribed in the Meiji ABS project, the 700 million civilian sentences could be reversed.

The family had reflected to the State Supervision Commission that the jurisdiction of the Yangzhou Supervision Commission originated from the false confession of Zhu Yuan, is "from the bottom up" level, not "from the top down" designation, the essence is that some others are set up for the interference in the Meiji case. during the first trial, the defense put forward the jurisdiction objections, arguing that the party's regulations as the central financial enterprise headquarters manager, should be governed by the relevant departments of the Central Discipline Committee, the Yangzhou Supervision Commission belongs to the cross-regional violations, was rejected by the court as "the higher organs of jurisdiction designated according to law".

At the first trial, the defense also pointed out that for the Meiji ABS project, the postal security bank's internal verification and the State Audit Bureau, the State Financial Supervision and Administration General Administration and other departments have conducted several rounds of inspections, and the conclusion is "business processes and system implementation norms". the approval authority of the general manager of the Ministry of financial markets at the time is 1 billion yuan, and the project's declaration amount is 19.9 billion yuan, far beyond the authority, must be submitted to the leadership and approval.

by 04

Testimony and overtime detention.

The most important increase in evidence in the second instance comes from the opposite statements of the accused witnesses.

A witness accused of bribing 750,000 yuan (of which 24,000 yuan have not been paid) to the party's per capita, actively contacted the family members of the party's per capita.The family said that the witness said he was investigated by the supervisory committee did not say to the party's per capita to trust bribes, paid to the party's per capita 750,000 yuan investment consultancy fee (with WeChat chat records proving the existence of substantial services), the bribed affairs in the note was written by the supervisory committee and forced him to sign, "If not to sign, can not leave."

The witness also revealed that during the Supervisory Commission investigation he was held in isolation and was subjected to enormous psychological pressure. It is understood that the lawyer had written a record of the witness and submitted it to the second-instance court.

Regarding the nature of this 750,000 yuan, the defense party in the first instance was put forward: the relevant business department of the party based on its financial expertise, the income of the lawful labor remuneration, does not belong to the bribes for the transaction of the right money.

The Yankees Dream House.

The defense party in the first trial pointed out that Zhu Yuan had been detained in December 2023 by the Kunshan City Public Security Bureau on suspicion of contract fraud filing case, the interrogation content of several times involving the Bank of Postal Deposits has no leadership on the Meiji business bribery issue, Zhu Yuan never mentioned the understanding of the party ratio, a month later the Kunshan public security withdrawal case; in March 2025, the High Post City Supervision Commission held Zhu Yuan; in April, held Huang Wei; in May, the Yangzhou Supervision Commission with the mouth of Zhu Yuan and Huang Wei held the party ratio.

It is understood that as of the second phase of the trial, Zhu Yuan, Huang Wei and the associates detained on August 27, 2025, are still in custody and have not been transferred to the prosecutor's office to review prosecution.

In the first trial, the defendant stressed that the three people's confessions have changed many times and contradicted the statements of the party's average charter, and lawyers have repeatedly requested the three people's appearance in court to explain the situation.

The "Situation Reflection" issued by the supervisors of the State Supervisory Commission issued by the family direction questioned that the three people, regardless of whether they constitute other crimes, were detained as witnesses in this case for more than a year, "the purpose is to fear that the aforementioned persons will be released to clarify the facts."

by 05

Three thousand complaints.

After the first trial, the complaint of the family members of the party has been fully launched.

According to statistics, as of the end of August 2026, Liu Yan issued more than three thousand reports, complaints and letters to the State Supervisory Commission of the Central Disciplinary Commission, the Provincial Municipal Disciplinary Commission, the judicial departments at all levels and the People's Congress, the CPC and other units, and visited the disciplinary committees at various levels to file complaints.

On June 24, Liu Yan went to the Central Discipline Commission's letter office, whose report was verbally notified to be officially accepted, and was transferred by the Jiangsu Provincial Discipline Commission's supervisory committee to the Yangzhou Discipline Commission's supervisory committee. on August 18 and 19, Liu Yan twice went to the Jiangsu Provincial and Yangzhou Provincial Discipline Commission's two-level supervisory committee's letter window to inquire, and the answer was "is under investigation."

First-party sentence of 12 years.