The Red Poo case is in court at the Whezhou Central Court.

In the case of the economic dispute between the Association for Economic Cooperation in the US Village of Austro-Austro-Austro-Auagawan District of Tsayu, Tang Guanglong, U.S., U.S.A., last month, the trial judge Lee Yan-Lin (female) ruled out interference and effectively upheld the legitimate rights and interests of the three villagers by a fair and impartial ruling in accordance with the law. For more details, see Guangdong, Whezhou: The village chief of the village team took “the villagers disagree” against the court's decision, and it was hard for the dead to be given a share of the human rights of the living!

This time, it was also a village economic cooperative and a village ' s shareholding dispute: a dispute between the village ' s village, Yip Hongxiang, and the East China Towns Economic Cooperative, which is a violation of the rights and interests of members of collective economic organizations.

On September 4, 2026, the Chinese Central Court of Hue was informed in writing by the Hongxiang Yao village of Donghua Village Commission, the town of Huiyang, in the town of Huizhou:

The case of Yvonne, a rural girl who has been a land-based girl in the tunnel, has been defending her legitimate rights for many years, believing that the case should not be confined to a written hearing, but that it must be heard in public, examined in full and monitored by society in order to guarantee and defend her right to litigation.

On September 6, 2026, the old lion, entrusted with the task of writing a trial application for the tenacious daughter of the family, was:

Hearing of applications

Case No.: (2026) Zen 13 Zen Zone 7985

Applicant (appellant, original plaintiff)

Yip Hongxiang, woman, Han ethnic group, born on XX/X/19XX, citizenship number 441XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, resident in the northern district of Taiping village, Tung Hua village council, Tung Huai village station, Huyang town, Huizhou, Guangdong province. Contact number: 1 XXXXXXX.

Respondent I (appellate, original accused I)

The Economic Co-operative of the East Hua Ridge Company, in the freshwater street of the Hueyang district of Huezhou City, and the East Hua Ridge Group in the freshwater street of the Huiyang district of Huizhou City, in the residential area, are the unified social credit code No. 1441303MF 4114325Q, legally represented by Wang Yong-Hong.

Respondent II (appellate, original accused II)

• Team of Villagers of East Hua Ridge, Fresh Water Street, Hueyang District, Huezhou City, and Team of East Hua Village Village, East Hua Street, New Water Street, Hyezhou City, United Social Credit Code No. 1441303MF4114325Q, Head of the group Wang Yong-Hong.

The applicant has submitted the following application to the Court of Cassation in accordance with the law in the case concerning the dispute with the respondent I. The respondent II. The prejudice against the rights and interests of the members of the Collective Economic Organizations (Case No. 2: [2026] Zen 13 Zen Zen 7985):

I. Application matters

The Court was requested to hold a hearing under the law for the case (2026), organized by the Zhogorku Kenesh (Penal Court of Appeal) No. 7985, without the application of written proceedings.

. The facts and reasons

The applicant is a legal member of the collective economic organization of the village of Zheng Village, the village ' s freshwater street in Hueyang, and is equal to the male villagers in the village, with the right to collective distribution of the income, the right to collective financial information, and the right to separate division of the household, as confirmed by the two civil judgements (2016) Zen 1303, the First Year 1270 and the Final Act (2016), No. 2823, which expressly ordered the two respondents to cease the differential treatment of the violation and to restore the same treatment to the applicant in respect of her " divorced woman " status.

In the second instance of the case, the Court served the applicant with the written notice of the proceedings, informing him that the case was to be examined in writing, in accordance with the law. After careful examination, the applicant considers that the case is one of a large number of material disputes, the submission of new evidence and the first instance proceedings are seriously flawed and that, according to law, it is not a " trial without need " situation under article 176, paragraph 1, of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China, and requests that you organize a hearing. The specific reasons are as follows:

(i) The case is marked by a large number of major factual disputes that are in opposition to each other and fall far short of the " clear facts " written trial premise

One. There is a fundamental contradiction between " formal and substantive performance ". The effective judgement ordered the respondent to " restore the applicant to equal treatment ". The respondent claims that the equity certificate has been processed and is considered completed; The applicant considers that the incorporation of the applicant into his brother ' s family and the registration of the household representative as an outsider, and the fact that the applicant ' s public security domicile, although independent as head of household, cannot be represented as a representative of the collective economic organization, is a formal certificate and a material failure to fulfil the judgement obligation. The dispute, which concerned a large number of facts such as the rules for registration of collective shares in the village, the statutes, the rules for the creation of household representatives, the distribution of the red-red model, had to be verified in court and could not be ascertained on paper alone.

1. There is a major controversy over the fate of collective assets and large land retention funds. The case concerned a total of $72,442,080 in the sum of 7362,162 land, which was collected by both respondents and transferred without permission from the base, $2 million to the Enterprise Investment Company, without the basis for the transfer, use of the funds and distribution programme. The value-added gains on the land were to be equally enjoyed by all villagers according to law, and the respondent claimed that " the money was fully distributed ", in direct conflict with evidence such as the transfer records held by the applicant, and the minutes of the 2015 meeting. The true and lawful flow of funds and the distribution thereof must be ascertained by the court in question.

1. The procedural legitimacy and effectiveness of the resolutions of the multi-household meetings are in major dispute. The respondent made separate household resolutions in 2019 and 2025, which forcibly incorporated the applicant ' s domicile into one of his brothers ' households, thereby depriving him of the base for the independent division, which was calculated only in half, and in essence, gender-specific treatment was applied as " a bride ". The applicant claims that his right to attend and to be heard at the relevant meeting was not guaranteed, that the villagers ' meeting resolution could not challenge the court decisions in force, and that the 2008 resolution (114 persons, 22 households), the 2013 resolution (25 households), the 2014 resolution (30 households) had conflicting records of the number of households, that a large number of undersigned and posing signatures existed and that the number of participants did not meet the statutory requirements. The facts of the convening of the meeting, the notification, the participants, the voting process, etc., must be verified in court.

(ii) Multiple new evidence submitted by the applicant at the second stage of the trial, which must be presented in court and examined by the law

The applicant submitted a series of additional key evidence during the second stage of the trial, including: a public notice of inspection and correction (which confirms that the superior clearly " has a higher judicial decision than the villagers ' meeting " ); a number of orders of correction; a decision on the execution of the instruments and review; a criminal self-claiming decision; land agreements and financial transfers; and civil registry information. The evidence above directly affects the outcome of the second instance decision.

In accordance with the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China and the provisions of the Supreme People ' s Court on evidence in civil proceedings, new evidence shall be presented in court, examined and heard before the parties can be used as a basis for a decision. If the written hearing is conducted in a written manner, and only a full court is seized of the case, the parties are unable to present and debate the truth, legality, relevance and purpose of the evidence in court. This would directly deprive the parties of their legal rights of proof, of their right to debate and of their procedural rights.

(iii) Significant procedural flaws and errors in factual findings in the first instance judgement, to be thoroughly ascertained in a hearing

(a) In case No. 3849 (2024) No. 3849, No. 1303, No. 1, which excluded from the civil jurisdiction the annulment of the illegal division resolution and the right to collective financial information, in violation of articles 56, 57 and 264 of the Civil Code of the People ' s Republic of China on the express and enabling provisions of the Law of the People ' s Republic of China on Collective Economic Organizations in Rural Areas; Second, the admissibility of a copy of the original unwritten check as the central basis for the determination of the case, in violation of article 73 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China, articles 90 and 95 of the Rules of Evidence of Civil Procedure, without a review of the application for the identification of the handwriting submitted by the applicant and without a negative presumption in accordance with the law in the event that the respondent has withheld all original documents; Third, the failure to respond to the application for the addition of a third person to the applicant in writing (Wing Yong Hung, Zhiyong, Zheng Wei Hung, and Jithong, Yao-geo) during the entire process, and the failure to add, reject and justify it, constitute a serious violation of the due process; Fourth, missing 2010 3.2 acre land compensation claims, including $19,000, with multiple claims for compensation, with the burden of proof being allocated inverted. The above-mentioned confluence of issues has led to a lack of clarity as to the facts on which the case is based and the evidence, examination and questioning must be organized by the full court in order to be fully established.

(iv) The case has been in conflict for more than a decade and the interest in it has been significant, and the hearing has been more conducive to the establishment of facts and the resolution of disputes on the merits

More than 10 years have passed since the judgement came into effect in 2016, after civil, administrative, enforcement and criminal self-indictment proceedings, which have not been resolved in substance for a long time. The case concerned the applicant ' s significant personal interests as a rural woman ' s collective distribution of income, the right to know, the eligibility for independent division of household, and the issue of the disposal of large collective assets. The proceedings allow the full hearing of the parties, direct questioning of the subject matter, and the organization of a confrontation, which is more conducive to the identification of the case and its closure, and to the avoidance of the continuation of the complaint and the correspondence of the parties after the simple written hearing, waste of judicial resources and damage to the credibility of the judiciary.

(v) The law provides that the second instance " shall be heard ", with the only strict exception of written hearings, which do not meet the legal requirements for written hearings

Article 176, paragraph 1, of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China clearly states: " The People ' s Court of the second instance shall hear appeals. After reviewing the papers, investigating and questioning the parties, the People ' s Court may not hold a hearing if no new facts, evidence or reasons have been presented. Article 331 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People ' s Court on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China further defines the circumstances in which a hearing may be held without a hearing.

The normative logic of the provision is clear: hearings are held on a principle and written hearings are exceptional; The application of written hearings must simultaneously satisfy the premise that " no new facts, evidence or grounds have been presented ". The contrary is true in the present case

• the applicant presented a large number of new factual claims, submitted many new evidence, presented many new grounds in the second trial, and there was a great deal of disagreement between the parties over the core facts and the application of the law, which was completely lacking in the legal prerequisites for a written hearing and which should have been held in accordance with the law.

. Legislative authority

One. (a) Article 176 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China;

1. Article 331 of the Supreme People ' s Court Interpretation of the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China;

1. (a) Article 73 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People ' s Republic of China;

The Queen of the West is a great country. (a) Articles 90 and 95 of the Certain Provisions of the Supreme People ' s Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings;

The government has been working on the issue of the death penalty. (a) Articles 56 and 57 of the Law of the People ' s Republic of China on Collective Economic Organizations in Rural Areas;

The government has been working on the issue of the Internet. Article 264 of the Civil Code of the People ' s Republic of China.

Concluding remarks

The Court is urged to guarantee the applicant ' s right to be heard, to be examined and heard in accordance with the law. The Chamber will hold a hearing under the auspices of the National Court (2026), 13th Session, 7985, to establish the facts and to decide the matter fairly, to defend the equal rights and interests of rural women in respect of property and to safeguard the integrity of the judicial decisions.

Here you go.

Intermediate People ' s Court of Huezhou City, Guangdong Province

Applicant (signed and handprinted): Yal-Ok-Yo

7 September 2026

Attach:

One. (a) Two copies of this application;

1. List of relevant evidentiary material and evidence (if any, submitted).

After receiving the Electronic Court Application for the trial of the Pilgrimage, which is available in electronic form from the Hou Lion, the case was sent to the presiding judge of the Huezhou Court.

During the morning of 7 September 2026, Yeh Hongxi received a summons from the Huezhou court in the morning of the day.

While expressing its gratitude to the old Huphou, Yip expressed his gratitude for the speed with which the case was handled in the Middle Court of Huezhou and expressed his appreciation and gratitude for the attitude and legal compliance of the Centre of Huezhou.

The old Hu Lion also once again recognized, praised and praised the Central Council of the Canton of Hue: “You are on the side of truth in upholding justice and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of rural women and their children. I hope this time, no exception!

The old hu lion also wishes the tenacious guest daughter a success in her rights!

"To be continued... #... #