The City of Chongqing court on October 27, the court case was filed against citizens for the denial of public access to and review of the documents of Hue-non.

Many are asking: Why should I sue the people's government of Chongqing?

The answer is never that I am a curator. The municipality directly under the jurisdiction was brought to the dock of the accused, two staff members who were found to have failed in their duties and to have violated the law.

First duty bearer: Chongqing City Supply and Marketing Agency staff, citing “internal documents” as a reason to refuse to disclose the documents of the Hinong who are concerned with the employment of thousands of farmers; Second responsible person: Chongqing Municipal Review Body, staff of the Municipal Judicial Service, disregard for national law, blocking of remedies, violation of the law, decision of inadmissibility of review.

These two illegal administrative operations, which were overloaded and pressed, eventually led to the administrative proceedings. I have been able to defend my rights in accordance with the law, through passive responses and, above all, through forced judicial self-help.

I. Trace: The sales agency seals the sun and locks the policy of the Hinon in the dark box

My initial claim was simple, legitimate and entirely legitimate.

I would like to consult, in public, a public document on the management of microcredit funds in the Chongqing Rural Cooperative (No. 2016-109).

This document, which covers the three core areas of public funding, is the microcredit distribution by the rural farmers ' cooperative community, the financial and agricultural benefits, and the consolidation and payment of the farm-related risk reserve.

Unclassified, unprivileged, unprohibited, 100% of public agricultural policies that should be made public.

In accordance with the Regulations of the People ' s Republic of China on the Publicity of Government Information, the policy of the non-profit farming sector, which is of vital interest to the population and requires wide public awareness, must be publicly and in accordance with the law, and the executive branch must respond to the application.

However, the staff of the Chongqing City Marketing Agency ignored the laws and regulations, the public ' s right to know and the rights of thousands of farmers. A rough and cold phrase “internal documents, not to be published” directly locks into the black box the transparent rules of the forest-related finance that should be the sun.

This is the first and most fundamental source error. Without this violation of the “refouler” and the “rejection”, there was no follow-up to all the rights and proceedings.

ii. Add: Review of the administration of justice by the Judicial Department, blocking the final correction of the citizens' error

After the public application was rejected in violation of the law, I followed the procedure established by law and filed an administrative review with the people ' s government of Chongqing city.

The administrative review is the legal green passage that the law leaves to the people to supervise the administration, correct errors and resolve disputes.

The new Act on Administrative Review clearly states that public replies to government information are considered by the law and must be reviewed and processed by the review body in accordance with the law.

The Chongqing municipal review body and the administration of the Municipal Judicial Service have no laws, no posts, no oversights. I have ignored my legitimate request for review, I have ignored clear legal provisions and have taken administrative decisions that are directly inadmissible.

This is the second fatal error.

If the refusal of the sales agency to disclose is “wrong”, then the review body's irregularities are inadmissible, knowing the error, refusing to correct it, short powers, closed loops, and pressuring the defence of rights.

Two levels of administrative defects and two violations: refusal to disclose at the grass-roots level and refusal to correct errors by the superiors. Legal channels are blocked and compliance routes are blocked.

There is no way for citizens to turn to the system of administration, the only remaining avenues of redress are the People ' s Court ' s judicial supervision.

So I'm bringing charges. The people ' s government of Chongqing city was thus in the dock.

Clarify: I never fought against power, I only pursued the demeanor of the performance of my duties

Many people confuse the concept: "According to the city, is it a confrontation with the government?"

Big mistake.

I am prosecuting administrative acts that are illegal ; I'm the one who's responsible for this. I defend the law of the sacred state.

The defendant in this case, although the people's government of Chongqing city, was the source of the proceedings, the non-governmental organization itself, but the individual, the operator of the act, the misdeeds.

• As a sales staff member, the people ' s living documents are blocked from the original purpose of the Hinong; It is the Judicial Bureau review staff, which departs from the rule of law norms and blocks access to relief.

Yes person violation, incompetent unit response.

Also in view of the fact that the case refers directly to the legality of the administration and is of vital public interest, I solemnly request the following: to request the People ' s Court to notify the head of the people ' s government of Chongqing in accordance with the law, and to give priority to the mayor in court; In case of failure to appear, the legal grounds must be stated in writing, the deputy of the officer responsible for the case and the case-setter must be assigned to the court, and the mere presence of a lawyer is strictly prohibited.

The prosecutor must be present and the prosecutor must be present. I do not want confrontation, I want to face the issue, I want to face the wrong, I want to get the wrongs done by the law.

iv. A document that was hidden behind the blood and blood of millions of farmers

Why would I die in a 109-day document?

Because it's not a piece of paper, it's for the farmers of Chongqing. Save, develop, and drive.

The rules are not transparent when documents are not made public; (a) The lack of transparency in the rules makes the funds easily out of control; Uncontrollable funds breeds the practice of withholding, misappropriation, covert cases and power-seeking rents.

Individual staff members of the sales agency, by the phrase “internal documents”, deprived all farmers of their right to know and be supervised; Individual staff members of the review body were denied the right to redress for errors by “inadmissibility” on one page.

Public-sector policy on agriculture, which is privatized; Legal rights are being protected in a piecemeal manner.

This is the core issue of the case, which is most painful and must be judicially corrected.

V. October 27th trial: the trial was a right, a right and a right and a wrong.

Case No. (2026) 05 Commencement 531 * * Date of trial: 27 October 1430 * Place of session: Court No. 23 of the Fifth Intermediate People's Court of Chongqing *

Submitted by: Zoron *

Defendant: Chongqing People ' s Government Case decided on inadmissible application for administrative review

I'm sitting here, I'm not emotional, I'm not confrontational, I'm not givin' traffic. I am only going to bring the law, evidence and facts, pending a fair and just decision.

I'm asking the court to find out the three core facts.

I'm asking the court to find out the three core facts.

• Is it illegal for Chongqing City Supply and Marketing Service staff to classify the local Effort Management documents as internal documents, to refuse to disclose them?
• Are the employees of the City Judicial Service and the Municipal Review Body of Chongqing, in breach of their professional standards and procedural law, inadmissible for legal review?
• Why are citizens being blocked by two levels of administration, in accordance with the law and in compliance with the law, and eventually forced to take administrative action?

Who makes mistakes and who is responsible; Whoever breaks his duty and accepts the blame.

End of period

And answer the whole web and ask: Who put the people's government in Chongqing?

Not the people.

A small loan company under the sales agency? Are you a professional who is a disloyalist of the Chongqing City Sales Agency for refusing to disclose the documents of the Hue-non? Is the officer in charge of the proceedings of the Chongqing City Judicial Department and the Municipal Review Body whose irregularities are inadmissible?

The Government was never the opposite of the rule of law, the individual who acted in breach of the law and acted in breach of the law, and the individual who acted in violation of the law.

October 27, Chuking Five. By law, by reason. The only thing that matters is that is to be held accountable, that there is a need to correct any mistakes, that there is transparency in government, and that there is no need for peace.

This paper will present only the facts of my case and the individual ' s legal knowledge, the final outcome of which will be determined by the court.