Former Vice-President of the City Council Zhang Huixang was sentenced to 13 and a half years of imprisonment: family members and lawyers insisted that they were in a false trap.

As a high school classmate and a fellow student who has spent 30 years together, Wu Gang can hardly imagine that the “town-maker” who graduated from Shanghai, and who in his own eyes “during his own life, he has become a prisoner of the next degree”.

In July this year, following a criminal conviction in the Liangyunang Courtyard in Jiangsu Province, the wife of Wu Kong Zhang Huiyang, the former Vice-President of the City of Huai An and former President of the Union of Chambers of Commerce and Industry was sentenced to 13 and a half years ' imprisonment and a fine of $1 million in the first instance for bribery and for negligence on the part of State-owned companies.

Former Vice-President of the City Council Zhang Huixang was sentenced to 13 and a half years of imprisonment: family members and lawyers insisted that they were in a false trap.

Zhang Huiyang. Web Pictures

The case is now in the second trial stage, and Zhang Huiyang ' s defence counsel remains acquitted. The U Gwang would not be ashamed of this, using the pen as a sword and the written as a sword, on the path of the path of justice for his husband.

Love wife becomes a “column writer”, fighting for her husband's sake

When it comes to lover Zhang Huiyang, the words Wu just said are filled with pride.

“In 2003, he was admitted to the Huai An City Transport Holdings Group Ltd. (hereinafter called ECTC) under the National Council of the City of Huai An as the first candidate. "The U Ganggu's “election” refers to the first social recruitment organized by the City of Huangan. Zhang Huiyang, then General Manager of Jiangsu Riingh Plastic Pipelines, Inc.

Zhang Huixang was elected to the Xianxiang control and initially served as Deputy General Manager. “The General Manager later chose to leave his post and return to the Government's functional departments because of his civil service status before Zhang Huiyang took over the overall job. Zhang Huiyang's family says:

This chairmanship is five years and it is logical that Huey should be given the corresponding treatment for the promotion of his office, “but the leaders above disagree. He therefore nominally had full responsibility for the company, but was still paid to the Deputy General Manager; Even he comforted us by saying, "Put it on the side, whatever." In 2011, the municipality established the position of General Manager of Zhang Huiyang, who became the first in the line of action. By 2016, the party secretary had been added to the Chongan control. Zhang Huiyang was back in the second-ranking position because he was outside the party. Zhang Huiyang will be out of the police station in early 2022 for 19 years. The family of Zhang Huiyang stated that, for almost two decades, Zhang had been at peace with his position and had never asked for it from a higher organization, which was not interested in “a promotion”.

However, after Zhang Huiyang ' s indictment, several charges of bribery occurred in his capacity as the General Manager of the ECTS.

Zhang Huiyang is being held in a holding cell. Liu Tiger, take it.

U.K. stated that Zhang Huiyang ' s origin in the investigation was that, in early 2022, Zhang, before being transferred from the Yingan control, did not recommend to his superior organization that Xu, then Deputy Secretary-General of the Party, take over as General Manager, was revealed to him by a well-intentioned source, while Xu ' s back-up forces were operating to take over as General Manager.* Zhang Huiyang did not recommend his replacement because, following his transfer from the Director of Transport and Communications of the Yiang Shui District under the authority of Hwang An, in 2017, several company cadres had reported serious violations by which Xu had used his job to obtain illegal benefits through mutilation, fee-for-gratting, etc. “Zhang Huiyang also joined other company leaders in organizing a meeting on integrity with Xu's subsidiary, which warned him of the need to set up regulations to prevent corruption from arising. However, these initiatives have had little effect on Xu, who has been a obstinate and abusive, has abused his authority, has formed a corruption squad with his close associates, has been working with illicit entrepreneurs and has transformed power into a tool for personal gain. The blogger adds:

In March 2022, the Huai An City Council conducted a patrol of the Yianyang control on the basis of a report from Xu. Although Zhang Huiyang has left, the inspection team spoke to him because he has been here for almost 20 years. Zhang Huiyang hopes that the patrol will remind Xu to obey the law. In April of that year, Xu was subjected to a perusal investigation by the Board of Supervision of the Huai An City Disciplinary Commission and was declared dismissed by the authorities in June (later sentenced to 11 years ' imprisonment). “Suh, who claimed to have reported to the organization during the investigation and who did not recommend his replacement as General Manager, was a source of hatred towards Zhang and threatened to have Zhang bury him. Since then, Xu has continuously falsely accused Zhang Huiyang of material which was eventually taken over by the investigating authorities. Wu just said.

According to Wu, the police report said that the police had cut off the businessman Wan-Cai, when they were “cutting the skirts” of a cadre of the State administration, and had not found any information on the official's infractions, but had found out that he had bribed the soldiers for $3 million. “That is the direct cause of the investigation into Xu’s army.”

“My beloved, during his nearly 19-year work in the YAX, the company grew from $200 million to $60 billion in assets, involving a large number of projects, but he did not engage in any power-seeking activities. “The U.U. just insisted that Zhang Huiyang was the result of reprisals by individuals against him and of the false claims made for the sake of his future.

Thus, from September 2025 to the present, U.N. just published more than 180 articles in his Wei letters public , “U Kong has no Quihua”, in which she has become a columnist. "I only hope that the "sing" in my heart will come soon. She said.

The decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party to consistently advance the implementation of a comprehensive and strict approach to some of the major issues of the Party, which was considered by the Party at its 20th plenary session, stressed that serious investigation and prosecution of false accusations of the crime and timely clarification of the name are necessary to ensure that the responsible, responsible and responsible are truly committed and that the responsible are supported by the willing, willing and responsible. “We must therefore not allow false accusations to be made, revenge to be made, and we must learn the lessons of history and not let the whole of society be at risk. The blogger adds:

Coercive confessions with “scaves” and “prior surgery”?

When Wu just opened the Wikimedia Commons, it was Zhang Huiyang's first court session. Before that, Zhang Huiyang had lost his freedom for 14 months.

In the Zhang Huiyang trial, there was a scene that made everyone in the gallery chill.

Zhang Huiyang's statement at first instance: two “interrogate experts”, one called “older” and the other known as “tao old”, were seconded by the Jiangsu Provincial Supervisory Board. During the trial, they threatened Zhang Huiyang that they had been involved in a number of major crimes throughout the country, such as Wang Chia Yiu, former head of the Anhui provincial council, Zhang Chihua, former head of the Jiangsu provincial council, and Wang Chiang. They use two means to conduct their cases. A “scave bag”

the person will be packed in a body bag and fed and saveled in order to prevent the stench from spreading, one layer up to the top and up to the fifth and sixth floors; Another, called “primate surgery”, is the operation of lasers on the brain pituitary of the person being questioned, which destroys the person and deprives the person being questioned of mental and consciousness, leading to full cooperation. They also threatened Zhang Huiyang with a political trial of his family and with his family and friends. Another interrogator said, “No one bad person is spared, no one good can be wronged. The blogger adds:

According to various feedbacks, and by way of personal identification by Zhang Huiyang, the real name of the “older” is Yu Su-chung, a retired member of the New Penang City Supervisory Board of the lower county of Jiangsu province.

Interrogator. Figure network

Zhang Huiyang said that he had also been informed that “the arguments of your two previous months had been compiled and called “The Word of the Words”, which is evidence of your “anti-party”. Once qualified as `anti-party elements', you no longer enjoy any rights of the person held in custody. We have always had any means to deal with anti-party elements. Let you die in prison. The blogger adds:

“This is not a trial. It's psychological delay. It's a death threat! “The family of Zhang Huiyang stated that, at the pre-court meeting, two prosecutors appointed by the Prosecutor's Office of Yundong City, Zhang Khun and Choi Qing, after hearing Zhang's detailed statements on the “scave bag” and “brain pituitary surgery”, replied: “This is only one of the interrogation techniques of the case officers. Moreover, the interrogators have not shown, used or used similar methods and measures throughout. The blogger adds:

The response to this understatement is a source of outrage to Wu.

U.U. just concluded that the investigating authorities should be tried in accordance with the law and that no one and in any case the person under investigation should be described to the person under investigation as how he or she was placed in a body bag; Nor should anyone describe to the person surveyed how an operation was used to destroy a person ' s brain. “I believe these means do not exist, but even if used as interrogation techniques, they are in themselves a serious betrayal of the rule of law! The blogger adds:

Zhang Huiyang ' s first trial lawyer, Song Jiujiang, stated that the above-mentioned statements by the interrogators were a distortion of our laws and our party ' s policies, that they were provoking political rumours, denigrating the basic guidelines of the party and human rights policies, that they were a ferocious attack on our country ' s basic political and legal system in a way that changed, that they were an attack on our national fundamentals and that they were a means of denigrating the cause of human rights and that they must be firmly opposed. All the confessions obtained as a result of the interrogation officers ' threats to force Huiyang to confess guilt through body bags and brain pituitary surgery were illegal evidence and the result of the venomous tree. It must be completely excluded by law and not be used as a basis for a decision. This is not a mercy to the accused, but a respect for the law.

“We all know how the statements came from. It should not be said that Zhang Huiyang is completely on an island of information in isolation from the four shifts of investigators and care workers he has been working with every day for six months without seeing natural light. In this case, whether his statement was objective or not, it was all called a question mark! "Attorney Song Kue.

(a) Song Jiujiang further obeisance: in that high-pressure environment, investigators threatened the health of Zhang Huiyang and even the safety of life; Threatening to retain his brother, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, wife; And the desire to “care” his son, to pose threats, is there fear in his heart? Will he be forced to make an unreal confession? Will they sign a statement that they did not sign out of their own will? The “screech bags, peri-brain surgeries” are a chilling and powerful tool.

“After being subjected to such intimidation and physical abuse, anyone would become a bird of shock, and few would have the will of Liu Hulan and Huang. Most of us are ordinary people, and it is impossible for everyone to behave in that environment. "Song Kue said.

Four counts of bribery “no need”*

Liang Yundong prosecution charged Zhang with two counts: bribery and negligence of State-owned company personnel. The largest of these was the receipt by Xianxian of $4.7 million (of which 3.2 million were not actually obtained) from Lee Weibao, former Chairman of the Board of Directors, after Zhang Huixian made a profit in the acquisition of shares in Jiang Suk Tian Sung Construction Group Limited (hereinafter referred to as Zheng Cheng Corporation).

All charges and the charges of the offence were pleaded not guilty by the defence team.

Li Weibo 4.7 million — Where's the cash coming from? *

The defence did not deny the objective facts of the acquisition of Tianjin, the assessment of assets, and the adjustment of the shareholding ratio by the ECCP, but denied that these acts were “for the personal benefit of Lee Weibo”.

Counsel for the Far East argued that these were normal business practices in State mergers and acquisitions, asset acquisition and enterprise development, major matters to be decided after a collective study such as “triple” and all first to be decided by the PSC, while the non-party member, Hwang Hui Xian, was only responsible for implementing the resolutions of the PSC, let alone conversely interpreting normal performance as a “profit-making matter” of the bribe.

For example, the so-called reduction of the shareholding of the acquired company from 66 per cent to 60 per cent is not sufficient to justify the special transmission benefits to Lee Weibo; The defence has challenged the facts of Zhang Hue-yang, known as the “agreement of $4 million and the payment of $0.8 million first”, in all respects, from the sources of cash, the time of delivery and the manner of storage.

Liangyun Harbor Detention Centre. Liu Tiger, take it.

By checking the cash-generating sources of Lee Weibo, as shown in the evidence, counsel for the Far East found that the sources of cash used to bribe him were seriously inadequate — the personal dependency fees, the cash withdrawals and the rental of houses, which had almost completely broken down since 2021, after the company had been holding the shares in control, were barely available and had been paid for less than 60,000 yuan a year, completely supplanting the so-called large-scale bribery statements. Even more ironic, the relevant documents, such as the bookwork, asset assessment, which took place when the company acquired its shares in 2019, show that*: Lee Weibo's personal name, Xiao Chong Hong Road House, which has been rented free of charge to his relatives Yuan Yi-Yung since 2009, has been calculated by the testimony of Lee Weibo to generate an annual rent of approximately US$ 13-14,000 and has been collected in cash *. This is clearly inconsistent with the diversion of the asset assessment.

How can we prove that millions of dollars of cash, their own origin and long-term custody cannot be supported by reliable financial information, that the closed circle of “where money comes from — when it is delivered — how it is kept — where it ultimately goes” cannot be accomplished by the mere evidence of Lee Wiebo's words?

Two million new * Tensions, how can we bribe?

In response to allegations of receiving $2 million in new cash from the former chairman of the Jiangsujeda Transport Engineering Group, the Liang Kong prosecution found that Zhang Huiyang had made new profits in the acquisition of the company, its schedules, statements, assessments, loan guarantees, etc.

However, defence counsel believes that it is the light security control that really obtains financing capacity, credit ratings and business benefits from M & As and M forms, not the new J & T company; And, in part, the above-mentioned acquisitions were partially controlled by the Affair Hand, which caused a clear loss of interest to Jedda, thereby creating new rivalries and dissatisfaction. “How can one continue to send money to Zhang when the new China is in conflict with Zhang Huiyang's demands? The blogger adds:

In this charge of bribery, defence counsel argued that: the logic of the prosecution's evidence refers to “co-statement” as a profit, and “statement” as a profit; The acquisition is considered to be profit-making, as is the non-acquisition. Charges that Zhang Huiyang “for the benefit of others” lost a perjury border.

U.S. just said that in both sides of the trade, many people knew that Zhang Huiyang and Zhang Xin were nervous about what Jeda was going to do. “This is an open matter, even if Zhang Huiyang once refused to allow a new entry into his office”, and “Is this relationship, which the Zhang Huiyang will pay Zhang Huiyang a bribe three times?” The blogger adds:

Zhang Huiyang's trial justified “the new man said that one night in June and July 2022, he drove to my neighbourhood north gate and then called me, and I was towed and returned to him a suitcase with 2 million cash. You guys called him and I were not even able to get a record of his call. If there were any calls, you would have sentenced me to death. I wouldn't have said anything! The blogger adds:

Left glowing 590,000 — houses are bricks, not frames

In response to Zhang Huiyang's allegation that he received $5,933,933 for left-lighted property from the former project manager of the Salt City Pique Company, the defence stated that, with regard to so-called profit-seeking matters such as the Chiang Da township village base and project development in Hongzawa district, the conditions for left-light access to land were not better than those of others and were in line with the local government's policy of “inventing money from the business”. The framework agreement between ECPAT and the Salt City Piqueland for the development of the gold-like-reducing plant plot is a framework agreement in which the parties expressly agree not to exclude cooperation with a better-quality third party.

Zhang Huiyang stated in the trial that “If this cooperation is successful, ECC could make a net profit of 200 million by

The Government has taken back the land, which is now unconnected. He then added, with his heart and heart: “Now think of it, it would have been lucky if the cooperation had not been successful, otherwise they would have fabricated the crime of bribing me millions of dollars with a left glow. The blogger adds:

As for whether the “framework structure” or “brick-and-brick structure” of the building sector in Zhang Huiyang directly affects the cost of building and the calculation of so-called property interests. The team of lawyers made several site visits and found that the house was indeed a brick structure; At the same time, according to the defence, the basis of the commissioning of the price determination was previously characterized by the Wyan City Supervisory Commission as a “framework structure” in the identification of the assistance material, which is equivalent to a pre-fix before requiring the price agency to calculate. "So, it's like you're not even looking at the subject, so you're gonna have to answer it. The blogger adds:

Pictures of the house in question that Zhang Huiyang kept on his cell phone

In addition, the defence systematically questions the legality and reliability of the price determination in the absence of a working draft, the completeness of the identification, the expert signature, the record of the proceedings, the review process, and the uniform form of the instrument. “How much property benefits did Zhang provide, in terms of step 10,000, even if he had provided construction assistance for left glowing? Is the basis for calculating this amount reliable with this set of price determination techniques? The blogger adds:

However, even though defence counsel provided live video of several floors of the wall and under the building, showing visible red bricks, testimony that the foreman had been involved in a mountain, which was clearly described as a brick structure, which was forced to lie by investigators during the investigation phase, the first instance court turned a blind eye and turned a blind eye. The couple filed an application for demolition of the house in court to confirm whether it was a framework structure, but the court did not respond.

300 thousand — 180 million saved, and instead bribed?

With regard to the allegation that Zhang Huiyang received $300,000 in cash from the former Governor of the North Road Branch in Nanjingshan, the defence alleges three irregularities. One is that the two sides are not close, and even admitted that they have not given any credit, and that it is not logical that Xue Fei “suppressedly gave Zhang Hui-yang 300,000 yuan”; Secondly, Zhang Huiyang later reported and complained against Xue Fei, and the defence therefore questioned why he would dare to report the other party if Zhang had already collected 300,000 yen from Xue Fei, thereby exposing himself to the risk of retort. Thirdly, the objective gains of the so-called “profit for Xoe fly” of Zhang Huiyang were not directly identified. The defence contends that objective evidence has shown that the change in the relevant financing contract of the Ember Bank actually reduced the financing costs and saved interest of approximately 180 million yuan for the security transfer.

“How much money and credit has Xue Fei himself received as a result, and the prosecution has full access to the banking personnel department, but has not proved in the most direct way; Instead, the most unstable and unreliable witness testimony was used, which was simply an unnecessary concoction. In the view of the defender, if ECC benefits from bank financing, how can it be converted into a use of its mandate for the personal gain of Xue Fei?

During the trial, the defence challenged “the first statement by Xue Fei was completed on 31 August 2024 and the second on 17 October. In his second statement, Xue Fei stated that he had travelled to Xianan to identify the exact address of Zhang and that he believed that it was false testimony. The defence applied for the Tribunal to trace Xue Fei between 1 September and 16 October

Shao Fei travels from Nanjing to Huai An, and there must be some trace of it, whether it's driving, riding high iron or taking a ride. Even if he had walked all the way, he would have been photographed by the incalculable surveillance along the way. However, the Tribunal did not respond to the application.

“Be serious and get down to the game and get the case straight”

“Be serious and walk through the scene and do the real thing. As a first-instance defender, counsel for Song Jiujiang has repeatedly used this phrase in court hearings.

This description is not based on fabrications or empty words.

The earliest guilty pleas concerning the alleged bribery of Zhang Huiyang were made on 28 October

The notes of the bribe-payers, Zhang Xian Xin, Lee Weibo and others were produced within a day or two before or after Zhang Huiyang's statement.

“The Inspection Act provides that a preliminary evidence of a crime is to be retained at the time of the initial approval of the case and that a definitive evidence of a crime is to be found at the time of the case's establishment. However, evidence of these allegations against Zhang Huiyang for bribery appears in a single form after he was kept for three months. A case can be opened without evidence, and a nuclear test without evidence. Are these not indicative of the illegality of the case? "Attorney Song Jiujiang says.

The defence considers that the allegations that Zhang Huiyang has arranged for the illegal occupation of agricultural land to begin construction of the Millennium Field Complex without the acquisition of land and construction formalities, resulting in the loss of more than $21.82 million in State-owned assets, are even more disproportionate and have many logics that are unconforming.

The defence argued that the first, Zhang Huiyang, was not the sole direct liability of the project. ECPAT has a complete corporate governance structure and major matters are subject to procedures such as party committees, boards of directors, general manager ' s offices, etc.; The field complex also has specific project companies and managers, such as the Light Millennium. “The concentration of responsibility for the project on the general manager of the group, while the weakening of responsibility for the direct implementers and the heads of subsidiaries, is an imbalance in the attribution of responsibility. "At the Far East, the lawyer said.

Lawyers are at the central yard gate in Liangyun. Interviewees

Secondly, what is the “Observation of Work Order of 1 June 2020” regarding the core evidence? The defence emphasizes that the opening order signed by Zhang Huiyang was a farm-working matter, not an illegal order to start work without obtaining the construction formalities from the tourist service centre, the technology shed that was subsequently inspected and which was required to be overhauled. The allegation that “Zhang Huiyang ordered the illegal construction work” was not true.

Third, the “hundred-day attack” was not a personal request by Zhang Huiyang to carry out work in violation of the law. The defence considers that the general advance request made by Zhang Huiyang on the project cannot be equated with its express requirement to break the law in the event of incomplete evidence; At the same time, counsel argues that the term “invertable order of reports, first to get on the bus and then to buy tickets” is a professional procedural rebuttal that the time point in which the report appears should be judged in the normal process of forming the investment project. According to the documentary evidence, the minutes of the meeting were written in black and white: Zhang Huiyang's statement asked “Don't rush, hold the line, even if it is one year. The government has been working on the issue of the human rights of women.

And finally and most importantly, who did the $21.82 million in losses? The defence had asked the prosecution to specify how the $21.82 million had been calculated, but the prosecutor refused to respond. The defence notes that even if a material loss ultimately occurred, it must continue to be proved that the loss would not have occurred without expediency to promote a specific breach of duty. The real loss of the project was due to the transfer of Zhang Huiyang ' s subsidiary to the Huang Wen Brigades as a whole after Zhang had left the surrender. In June 2024, the Huai An Wen Brigades Group finally decided to stop investing in the project by assessing the current real estate situation. Counsel states that the final collapse of the project cannot be used to cause damage to the project and to hold one of the leading leaders criminally responsible.

The Ministry of Natural Resources, in its circular No. 16 of 7 May 2021, issued by the Ministry ' s network of officials, " Information on 45 typical cases of rural land-grabbing in the construction of houses ", is the case of the Light Millennium Field Complex project. It was clear from the circular that 3.44 acres of arable land were illegally occupied to build project management accommodations, toilets and other ancillary facilities. The person concerned had demolished the illegal building on his own initiative and the land had been re-ploughed. The Zhang Huiyang trial showed that the construction costs of the 3.44 acres were less than millions, and that even if he was to be forced to be charged with a breach of duty, he should be held responsible for the irregular construction on the 3.44 acres, instead of the 21.82 million lost on over 1,500 acres.

“The responsibility for the subsequent continued construction of the field complex, project management, stop construction, demolition and increased loss must be directed to the direct project manager and the successor manager, and the level of criminal liability required for the negligence of State-owned company personnel, even if a general leadership responsibility exists, is not sufficient. The defense counsel says.

The defence considers that the charge of guilt is based on the unlawful acquisition of evidence such as evidence of a guilty confession, a briber and witnesses whose authenticity and stability are in doubt, selective interception of electronic data, a disputed procedure and a price determination of the underlying facts; The extensive and objective documentation of the minutes, the minutes of the meetings, the information on corporate governance, the on-site examination and the defence investigation material have proved that the so-called “profit for others” is a purely normal business act, that the field complex is part of collective decision-making and is carried out by many people, and that the criminal liability for the project's losses should not be attributed to the individual. The evidence of the Yundong prosecution is therefore not a complete system of proof beyond reasonable doubt and should be acquitted in accordance with the law.

In the first instance, Zhang Huiyang, the defence has combed 32 procedural irregularities, filed no response to more than 40 applications and none of the applications for the appearance of witnesses in court was allowed.*

Wu just said: This case is completely off my cognitive threshold. “I can accept and cooperate with the fact that I have to do what I have to do, even with a magnifying glass, to find out from his 19-year-old work. But there is one line that I will not accept, nor will I turn back: it is the reverse of the black and white, and the innocent shall never be found. There can be no falsification before the law — it is not just about the promotion of a person, not just about our family, but about the last line of justice in this society. The blogger adds:

The case against Zhang Huiyang is currently in the second trial of Jiangsu High Court and no decision has yet been made as to whether to proceed. The progress of this case will continue to be followed up by the authors.