The official of the City Council of Tae Hing, Secretary of the Political and Law Commission, Liu Hui, was accused of protecting Wu Yun: Billion Dollar in the ship-hunting case, and of taking a huge bribe and a suspicious white glove in Xinjiang.

On the afternoon of 30 October 2026, a colloquium for outside entrepreneurs was held in Jiangsu Tae-hing. Liu Fai, Director of the Standing Committee of the Municipal People ' s Congress, attended the meeting and encouraged entrepreneurs to bring their projects, funds and resources home. The next day,Tachin City City websiteThe event was published.

The former official, who was a member of the Standing Committee of the Thaksin City Council, the Secretary of the Political and Legal Commission and the Deputy Secretary of the City Council, is still in important local leadership positions. However, a series of reports of corruption and asylum-seeking around his past employment led to a major criminal case that lasted almost a decade.

In March 2017, an armed battle against the Blue Sea 300 took place in Jiangsu Tae-hing. Several people were accused of entering the shipyard with machetes and cutting equipment, controlling the staff on the ground and attempting to forcibly remove a ship worth over billions of yuan that had been judicially preserved by the Court.

Further leads from Focus China revealed that Wu Yun collected 3 million yuan before organizing operations and 2 million yuan after the event, for a total of 5 million yuan. After the incident, an additional approximately $12 million was suspected of being used for bribery and judicial arbitrage.

The case was eventually dealt with mainly on the basis of the offence of stalking, and Wu Yun was sentenced to one year and four months in prison.

Long-term reports about Wu Yun also cover gambling, loan-based loans, drug-related, violent debt-collection and construction interests. The former Tasheng City Council Standing Committee and Secretary of the Political and Law Commission, Liu Fai, were accused of having close personal ties with Wu Yun and suspected of providing him with political asylum.

Meanwhile, Liu Fai ' s real estate economic interests during his tenure in Xinjiang's territory were re-entered into the investigation with the records of the Green Forest business and the subsequent public activities of the two.

The relationship between funds, businessmen, local justice and party officials, behind a knife-snapping case, has become the most important public interest issue in the Thai-heng old case.

$5 million in two separate payments, more than 20 people with knives breaking into the shipyard

On 28 March 2017, elements such as Wu Yun and Cao Rue, Shenzhen, Wang Lei and Liu Xuan were accused of being involved in planning the capture of the Blue Sea 300.

The ship is docked at Jiangsu Harbour Shipping Company Limited, in the Rainbow Bridge area of Taehing City. At that time, there was an economic dispute between Jiangsu Port China Shipping Company Limited and the Blue Sky Trades and Industry Corporation of Tae-hyun City, and the business property in question was subject to judicial preservation procedures.

Information on previously published casesCiting the Taising City People's Court (2017) Su 1283, Civil Decision No. 17, the Court took measures of protection of property on 10 March and the Blue Sea 300 was also within the scope of preservation, with a declared value of $107.6 million.

There are clear compensation arrangements behind this operation.

The leads obtained by Focus China show that Wu Yun collected $3 million before the operation was launched and then organized the personnel concerned to enter the shipyard and seize the ship.

In the early hours of 29 March, more than 20 participants arrived at the shipyard in Chinese buses, Mercedes commercial vehicles and sedans. Some were carrying machetes and oxygen cutting equipment, others were in charge of controlling the entrance to the plant area and others were ready to meet on the river.

The previous public scene recorded some persons entering the doorroom of the shipyard with a knife in their face, chasing the doorman, who was handsome, and controlling another doorman, Lee, who was a national and a shipyard worker, forcing the person at the site to hand over his mobile phone.

The participants then opened the gate to the factory, drove the vehicles in and continued to control the staff guarding the ship. Some of the personnel used knives and cutting equipment to destroy the cable and attempted to pull Blue Sea 300 from the scene.

During the operation, the police were called to the police. Wu Yun was alleged to have been involved in the evacuation and transfer of the crime tools of the personnel involved in command of the incident, as he had been informed of the alarm.

Upon completion of the operation, Wu Yun collected an additional $2 million. This, together with the $3 million paid before the operation, brought the total compensation to $5 million.

The timing of the two payments has made the funding arrangements behind the violence clearer. Pre-payment and ex post facto supplemental compensation correspond to the organization of the operation and the distribution of benefits after completion, respectively.

The incident was not a temporary or a temporary incident of a regular talk or occasional conflict. Public disclosure involves pre-planning, division of labour, means of transport, armed control and competition over property over particular ships.

However, when the case is brought to justice, the final offence and sentence are clearly in contrast to the circumstances of the violence described in the report.

♪ From armed to scavenging, judicial proceedings continue to cause controversy ♪

On 9 August 2017, the Thaksin City People ' s Court heard some of the participants. It was publicly documented that Wang Rei and Liu Xin were subject to different sentences.

On 10 November of the same year, the Thaksin People ' s Procuratorate filed a public indictment against Wu Yun for the offence of sedition.

On 8 December, the Thaksin City People ' s Court sentenced Wu Yun to one year and four months ' imprisonment. Wu Yun appealed the judgement and appealed. On 8 February 2018, the Thai Intermediate People ' s Court rejected the appeal and upheld the sentence.

In June 2018, the prosecution service brought further prosecutions against the participants in Cao Rao and Shenzhen. In July of that year, the persons concerned were sentenced to different sentences and some were granted suspended sentences.

An armed operation against the preservation of property by the courts, involving more than 20 participants, billions of dollar-grade property and pre-arranged remuneration, was eventually dealt with mainly under the offence of sedition and became the centrepiece of years of dispute in the case.

The perpetrators of the specific violence in the case were subject to various levels of criminal punishment, and the organizer, Wu Yun, was sentenced to only one year and four months ' imprisonment. The disparity of penalties between some participants and the alleged organizers also called into question the division of responsibility in the case.

It is even more of concern that the black trail did not end with the verdict of Wu Yun following his execution.

Public reports previously documented that Wu Yun was detained after his release for a new black investigation, but was soon released on bail pending trial. Subsequently, information on their activities on yachts to Hainan Sanya during the period of the take-off continued to be controversial.

The outcome of these cases reflects the criminal responsibility of U Yun and the process of the local judiciary, which has been in public challenge for a long time.

$12 million in suspected bribery since the crime was committed, and the charges extended to the political and judicial authorities

More noteworthy than the conviction of Wu Yun for a year and four months is the huge financial trail surrounding the handling of cases.

Further allegations received by Focus China relate to the bribery of approximately $12 million after the case, stating that Wu Yun and his associates had mediated the relevant political and legal relations after the armed seizure, in an attempt to influence the handling of the case and the prosecution of the criminal charges.

Two different groups of funds have emerged.

$5 million is the sum of money that is meant to be used to organize and complete armed hijacking; The sum of $12 million is meant to be used for the operation of judicial relations after the crime.

The former occurred before and after the violent acts, while the latter referred to the transmission of benefits that might exist at the stage of public security investigations, prosecution and court proceedings.

The exact flow of $12 million in suspected bribes has not yet been fully and publicly determined, but this allegation has extended the investigation from U Yun and his associates to the extent that there was any improper interference by public officials in the case.

In the previous campaign against vice, the case of Wu Yun was also publicly reported in connection with the central anti-crime supervision.

After several rounds of criminal proceedings, problems surrounding suspected bribery, the characterization of the case and the liability of the person concerned remain. This makes the way the political and legal organs of Thaksin have dealt with historical cases part of the investigation that cannot be separated from the personal conduct of Wu Yun.

Former Secretary of Political Law of Tae-hyun Liu was accused of providing asylum and Nanking ' s private interest was of concern

The name of Liu Fai has a special weight in the long-standing black-off reports about Wu Yun.

Liu Fai was the Secretary of the Taehing City Council and the Political and Legal Commission, responsible for the leadership, coordination and coordination of relevant political and legal matters.

The public record of the city of Tae-hyun.It is indicated that on 24 July 2020, Tae-hyun convened an expanded meeting of the Citywide Leadership Group for the Fight against Corruption. Li Bishan, then Deputy Mayor and Director of Public Security, chaired the meeting, the Permanent Council of Municipalities and Secretary of the Political and Law Commission, Liu Fai, attended and addressed the meeting.

On 1 September of the same year, Yao Xinbin, the Deputy Director-General of the Shoujia Criminal Investigation Office of Jiangsu Province, went to Tae Xing to investigate and combat the evils, accompanied by Liu Fai and Li Bishan.

These two official records clearly show the political and legal leadership position of Liu Fai and the actual situation of his involvement in the fight against corruption.

When the Blue Sea 300 case occurred in 2017, Liu Fai was not yet Secretary of Political Law at the Thaksin City Council. But Liu Fai is already in the local political and legal leadership when the U Yun case remains controversial, new black-faced investigations and coercive measures continue to emerge.

More sensitive is the reported private interest between the two.

The leads provided to Focus China alleged that Wu Yun was closely associated with Liu Fui and had helped Liu Fing to support several lovers in Nanjing and to cover the related housing and living expenses. There are also allegations of private worship relations between the two persons.

These allegations relate to specific personal economic benefit arrangements, not mere social interaction. Their authenticity and whether they are related to official conduct determine whether they constitute corruption.

From the perspective of public power, the question is whether a businessman who has been involved in a major criminal case for a long time, in exchange for political support or judicial convenience, can bear private expenses on behalf of public officials.

Liu Fai was in the process of conducting the Tae-hyun political and legal work, and the fight against corruption and vice was being waged on the ground. The reports on Wu Yun already cover violent crime, gambling, loan-based loans, drug-related activities and possible judicial corruption.

When officials who have reported financial interests with the business people involved are also in positions of local political and legal leadership, the handling of the cases involves prominent issues of power oversight and conflict of interest.

The CJC does not directly substitute for the courts in their decisions, but its leadership and coordination in local political law work is sufficient to make case management, major case flow and staff oversight part of public responsibility.

Xinjiang's career is turned over again, and the Greenwood White Glove leads involve real estate interests

Liu Fai ' s economic interests dispute can also be traced back to his tenure in Xinjiang.

25 September 2010The Thai Government issued document [2010]165 establishing the Working Group on Counterpart Support to Zhusu County of Xinjiang Ishi State, where Liu Fai, then Deputy Mayor of Tae Xing, was appointed as Deputy Chairman.

Subsequently, Liu Hui went to Zhousu as the Standing Committee of the District Council and Deputy District Chief, and participated in local solicitation of funds and construction of industrial projects.

A document of 17 February 2013 was released by the Zhusu District GovernmentLiu Fai is a member of the county-wide leadership group for business solicitation and is responsible for the related industries and is also the deputy head of the working group on construction of the Green Organic Agricultural Processing Cluster.

This working group deals with land acquisition, road construction, drainage, electricity packages and financing arrangements for State-owned investment companies.

It was also during the Xinjiang period of service that the economic interests between Liu Fai and the Thai real estate businessman, Chan Greenwood, were reported.

The leads point to the holding of real estate project assets, which are operated by the Green Forest, while Liu Fai is being instructed to participate in the distribution of benefits by using the resources of the vendors and the administration behind the scenes. The report also covered the increase in the project ' s house price from approximately $800 per square metre to over $4,000, as well as the large assets held and funds transferred.

The Green Forest of Money is designated as the “white glove” of Liu Fai's real estate interests, which has brought the relationship between the actual beneficiaries of officials and the nominal holders of the business to the forefront of the investigation.

The Qin Green Forest is a business in Xinjiang and can be identified from local official sources.

Eighth Model List of Persons for the Progressive National Solidarity, published by Xinjiang Autonomous Region in 2021The Green Forest was classified as Secretary and Chairman of the Party Branch of the Residency Real Estate Development Corporation of Altai.

Of even greater concern is the fact that, many years after Liu Fui ended his tenure in Xinjiang, they are still in open contact in the official activities of Tae Xing.

On 3 August 2024, the head of the company, the Promising Real Estate Development Limited, in Brzin District, Chan Greenlin donated $500,000 to the Tachin City Education Fund.

The Tehing City Education Department announced a bulletin on 5 AugustIt is well documented that the donation ceremony was attended by Liu Fai, then Deputy Secretary of the Thaksin City Council and Minister of General War.

Public donations cannot in themselves prove that there is a illicit transaction, but, in conjunction with previous allegations of supplanting of real estate assets, the two have a specific investigative value, in terms of their historical business links, the related business equity and investment projects.

The publicly-run real estate enterprise in Chan Greenwood is located in Burzin district, Althai district, while Liu Fai is based in Zhusu district, Ishahara State. Business linkages, investment structures and distribution of benefits between the two-field projects remain an important part of this new line of inquiry.

From 2010 to 2024, when both of them attended the donation, the public record provided a time line for many years of business.

From Xinjiang to Thaksin, two lines of dispute involve different stages of public power

Liu Fai was involved in the recruitment of business and industrial project construction during the period of Xinjiang, and served as Secretary of the Standing Committee of the City Council and the Political and Law Commission in Tae Hing.

The two functions involve different resources: the former relate to investment in enterprises, project coordination and local economic development, while the latter relate to local governance, anti-blacking and case coordination.

With regard to the report on the Green Forest, concern was expressed about the relationship between private capital and the hidden economic interests of officials. With regard to the report by Wu Yun, it was concerned with the existence of an improper exchange of asylum and benefits between businessmen and local political and legal officials.

The two sets of leads cannot simply be merged into a single, proven group of interests, but they point to the same local official with a continuous experience and each correspond to specific personnel, competencies and commercial activities.

Liu Fai has since served as the Standing Committee of the Tae-hyun City Council, the Deputy Mayor and Deputy Secretary of the City Council, and was elected President of the Te-hyun City People ' s Standing Committee in January 2026.

On 30 October, he again attended the entrepreneurship symposium in his capacity as the head of the Standing Committee of the Municipal People ' s Congress, on the subject of access to capital and local economic development.

Just before the campaign, the Central Commission for Political Affairs had once again deployed its national anti-blacking efforts.

♪ The new cycle of blackouts re-emphasizes the "Playing the Net" and the old Thaksin case faces a real test ♪

24 October 2026The meeting was chaired by Chen Wengqing, member of the Central Political Bureau of the Communist Party and Secretary of the Central Political and Legal Commission, and called for a deepening of the fight against corruption, for the intensification of the investigation of major cases and for the promotion of “brain-breaking” and of industry governance.

This is a clear political deployment once again made by the Chinese Communist Party in a new and dedicated struggle.

The official focus on governance shows that organized violence, illegal lending, criminal funds, corrupt officials and protective relationships are all subjects to be addressed.

The controversy in the Tae-hyun-Uyun case is precisely one of those areas.

On the one hand, there was the armed seizure of the Blue Sea 300 in

1. According to further leads, Wu Yun charged $3 million before and $2 million after the incident, involving a major pre-organized violent competition for property.

On the other hand, there are allegations of 12 million yuan in bribery since the incident and the long-standing judicial disputes surrounding the case of Wu Yun.

In addition to the private interest arrangements that exist between Liu and U Yun and the responsibility of Liu Fai in the leadership of local government and law, the investigation is being referred to the relationship between public officials and the businessmen involved.

The new round of eradication of the “breeding” highlighted cannot involve only the property of the person involved in the ordinary case, but also the financing and benefit arrangements behind the organization of the crime; The “brainbrainline” cannot stop at law enforcement personnel at the grass-roots level, and should even cover public officials who have improper economic relations with the businessmen involved.

In the Blue Sea 300 case, U Yun, who was directly involved in the knife-bearer operation and the organization in question, had entered the criminal justice process. However, the results of the public treatment do not provide a complete explanation for the full payment of $5 million, the suspected bribes of $12 million and the possible existence of a power haven.

Meanwhile, the reported interest between Xinjiang Real Estate businessman, Greenwood and Liu Fui, and the subsequent public business activities that can be traced, have also extended the investigation to the issue of the economic benefits of officials in different positions.

This is why the Tae-hyun Oh Yun case is of continuing news value.

The CPC has repeatedly carried out anti-crime efforts and has repeatedly emphasized the protection of officials behind the eradication of the forces of evil. But when it comes to major assets, huge funds and local political and political leaders, it is always more important than to see how many cases are reported and how many ordinary individuals are involved.

The Tae-hyun U Yun case, which spanned 2017 to the present, involved armed violence, property competition, case handling and official interest. Liu Fai has been promoted to the rank of Director of the Standing Committee of the Tai Xing City People ' s Congress, who was the Secretary of the Political and Law Commission in charge of the fight against corruption.

The new cycle of "blacking the net" in 2026 is again declared. If the money chain stops when the judiciary is located and the responsibility for the case is taken over by the officials, the repeated and exclusive struggles continue to be difficult to reach the power base on which the local dark forces may depend.

This is the real test left by the old Tae-hyun case for a new round of anti-terror killings.

Related reports and public documents

• I'm sorry.Armed seizure of the Blue Sea 300 in 2021 and judicial handling of reports
• I'm sorry.Thai Municipal Government 2010 Task Force Appointment Paper
• I'm sorry.The Zhusu District Government has issued a document on the division of labour for the solicitation of funds.
• I'm sorry.The political and legal record of the city of Tae-hyun in July 2020
• I'm sorry.Xinjiang Autonomous Region 2021 Green Forest recognition record
• I'm sorry.The Tychen City Education Department's Green Forest 2024 grant report
• I'm sorry.Report on the Entrepreneurs Symposium of the Thaksin Municipality on 31 October 2026
• I'm sorry.Xinhua Society's 24th October 2026, deepening the anti-terror coverage