After the mayor of Jiangxi Goan, who was convicted of breaking the law, was promoted: who will respond to the “sick promotion” challenge?

The former mayor of the town of Gangxigwan: You'll be killed if you don't agree.

Should Sundh be given a statement after the court finally confirmed that the demolition of the town of Jiangxi Goan, which was ordered by the former mayor of Sundh, had been illegal and that Sundh had just been promoted to the post of the head of the city's administration?

My name is Liu Jiu-Peng, Jiang Si-Gwan, 54 years old.

Six years ago, I ran a food factory, with a factory, equipment and workers, and I lived a good life. Six years later, I was still in power, and the man who commanded the demolition of my factory had been promoted.

Today, I would like to say this from the beginning to the end.

I. No expropriation decision, no land confiscation, the town government is going to dismantle

Since 2019, the large town government has been talking about the demolition of the town under the name of the “South Project for the Elite Industrial Park of the New Technologies in Gao An”.

Talk about it, but come by the law? However, the project has not been able to obtain a decision from the People ' s Government of Gaoan City on the expropriation of houses, nor has it been able to obtain a recoupment of the land to be collected by the People ' s Government of Jiangxi Province, nor has it been declared by law that it has been possible to collect and rehouse the properties.

To be honest, this is a project that does not have a legal basis for collection. I didn't sign the agreement because I was afraid to sign it, and I didn't know who to sign it with.

II. On March 13, 2020, 200 people surrounded my factory

The day was the most intense time in the country, when people were restricted in their movement and were afraid to leave.

On that very day, Sun Degang, then the mayor of the large towns and cities, directly directed the movement on the ground, organized town officials, auxiliary police and social idle persons, more than 200 people, and surrounded my factory and home.

I was not informed in advance that the parties had never concluded any agreement on compensatory resettlement.

There is no Demolition Notice of Time Period, no Enforcement Decision, no notice period for self-destruct, no right to be heard, and no application for enforcement by the People ' s Court according to law.

Articles 35, 37 and 44 of the Administrative Mandatory Law are clear and clear, and none of them has been done.

The factory was pushed.

The Supreme High District People ' s Court (2020), in its judgement No. 58, in the first sentence of the 0923 line, and the Intermediate People ' s Court of the City of Yichun (2021), in its final decision No. 83, in the final judgement of the 09 line, confirmed that the demolition was illegal.

The court admitted that nothing could have happened to the man who could have been forced to do it.

Three, before the breakup, Sun Dell was in his office saying, "Tow you to death."

Before the demolition, my nephew Liu Shuxiao went to the town government office to negotiate, and Sundu said in person:

“You do not agree, you will be killed. The blogger adds:

The lawyer I commissioned earlier went to the town to consult, and he made it clear that he would not talk to the lawyer.

I remember that very clearly by the principals of a town government.

iv, things are moving out, they're open, nobody counts, no notaries

The day of the demolition, the plant's production equipment, food raw materials, finished products, packagings and the economic wood in the factory area were not registered, no inventory of items was made, no notary of the notary public was not present and no video was recorded in the original form.

When the material was removed, it was stored in open areas at random, and a large amount of the operational material was destroyed and destroyed.

I had previously done an evidence-based notarization to remove the original property of the former plant, which was clearly and clearly included in the certificate. But they don't care. Articles 24 and 26 of the Administrative Mandatory Law stipulate that the seizure of property shall be listed, kept in safe and without damage. They're fine.

Five, at the height of the epidemic, there are over 200 people gathered.

On 13 March 2020, local governments at all levels were demanding a reduction in the number of people and the unnecessary non-organization of large-scale group activities.

Sun De was just at this point in time when more than 200 people were organized in a single group to organize large-scale gatherings and demolitions.

The event was taken as a result of the epidemic control window, the public was prevented from travelling and the access to rights was blocked. What's this called? It's called pick time.

Six. Families are blocked for hours.

The site was demolished, and over 200 people took my family Liu Si Jin wife and husband to the factory yard, and prohibited going out, taking pictures, recording, and recording, and many people continued to block and intimidate for hours.

We called the police at 110 times at 8:59 that morning. The arrival of the civilian police officers on the scene was not stopped, there was no isolation, no evidence, and only one formalized police registration form was issued and the police officers left.

The illegal demolition continued and evidence on the ground was lost. (The issue of police service is reflected separately. I'm not sure.

Seventh, the court found the law illegal, he was promoted to the Director of the Department

In 2021, the final judgement of the City Intermediate People ' s Court of Yichun confirmed that the forced demolition committed by SANDK was illegal.

And?

There is no party disciplinary action and no accountability.

On 4 April 2023, Sundh was promoted to the post of Secretary and Director General of the Gauan City Administration Party by vote of the 13th Standing Committee of the 7th People ' s Congress of the City of Gao An.

Administrative acts were finally confirmed by the courts as violations, but were promoted. I'd like to ask: how does this turn out when you're in the executive selection and appointment? Who's the proposer and the approver? Is this a "morbid promotion"?

. After promotion, no matter what remains,

After becoming the City Control Director, Sundh ignored and ignored the follow-up to my demolition.

I was never consulted on the rehabilitation, and I was passively confronted, delayed and ignored the legitimate demands of the population for six years.

Article 126 of the CCP disciplinary regulations is clear. It is a violation of public discipline by negatively responding to the demands of the people who comply with the policy, by pushing the skins and the skins, and by undermining the party and the group relations.

* * * * * * * * * *

I'm going to put it this way, I'm asking three things.

I'm going to put it this way. I'm asking three things.

First, to initiate a review of the decision-making irregularities, the forced dismantling of illegal organizations, the organization of large-scale gatherings in violation of the provisions of the epidemic, the failure to fulfil the obligation to preserve property and the restriction of personal liberty, and to issue disciplinary sanctions to the party during his recent tenure as mayor of the large town; Persons suspected of having committed an offence are referred to the judicial authorities.

Secondly, the issue of Sundh's promotion after being illegally dismissed without being prosecuted was checked for “diseased promotion” and negligence in the selection and appointment of cadres.

Thirdly, Syndicate and his former unit are urged to address the remaining problems of illegal demolitions in accordance with the law and to correct the practice of neglect and negative prevarication.

X, I have proof

I'm not talking in vain. I have:

1. A copy of the People ' s Court of Upper Gao (2020), No. 58, No. 0923, No. 58, No. 9;

2

• A copy of the administrative judgement No. 83 of the Intermediate People ' s Court of Yichun (2021), which ends in 09;

1. A copy of the certificate for the preservation of evidence;

4,110 copies of police alert records and police registration forms;

1. The appointment of a message or public report interception at the thirteenth meeting of the 7th People ' s Standing Committee of the City of Gao An;

1. A public information cut-off for the curricula vitae of Sundh, former Deputy Secretary of the SSP Labour Committee of the state of Rey County, and the mayor of the town and town.

The court judgement was there, the notary was there, the police records were there.

Six years, I've been from 50 to 54 years old. The factory is gone, the things are destroyed, and people are waiting for a statement.

I'll write this letter out, send it out. I believe there is always a place where the judgements are carefully looked at and the claims of a common man are listened to.

Reporter: Liu Jiubeng

31 October 2026

This document is based on the letter of the actual report and the facts are supported by evidence such as the in force decision, the certificate, the police record, etc.

(Statement: This document is based on the letter of the actual report, and all the facts are supported by evidence such as the court documents in force, the certificate, the police report, etc., and the person responsible for the authenticity of the content of the web site. I'm not sure.

A micro-evaluation: Who can give a reasonable explanation for the promotion of a rape conviction and the promotion?

The final court verdict confirmed that the rape had been committed, and the commander had been promoted from the mayor to the head of the city's administration — the most striking aspect of the incident was not how brutal the demolition itself was, but the absurd logic of being promoted after the violation, without being held responsible.

At the time of the most severe outbreak, a mayor organized the demolition of more than 200 factories without a warning, decision or defence, after an exhaustive, notarized, unguarded, and took legal proceedings on a daily basis. The court found the offence in violation of the law, but the party disciplinary action was not followed by accountability, but was appointed by the Municipal Standing Committee by vote two years later and sitting in the office of the Chief. This makes it necessary to ask whether the appointment chain for the selection of cadres, the hard wound of “the court has found the law to be illegal”, is ignored or not seen at all.

The “morbid promotion” stings the public because it sends a dangerous signal that the cost of the violation can be zero and that even the violation can be a “daunting” footnote. The references and approvals, the question of whether the examination was properly reflected and whether the integrity review had gone too far require a statement to the whistleblower and to the public.

Liu Jiubun, the source, has been living from 48 to 54 years of age, the factory has been destroyed, the materials destroyed and six years have elapsed since he was reported to have been killed. His claims are not complex: the responsibility for the pursuit is in place, the promotion of the inquiry is clear, and the rehabilitation is not a pushover. Each of these three things is a minimum requirement, not an additional gift, as prescribed by law.

The court's decision was not a waste of paper and the popular claim should not be “tried to death”. If the deposed commander can be promoted without any harm, what authority is the verdict? What is the seriousness of the selection of cadres? This requires an answer that is affordable.

Social commentators, the voice of justice