Called on Pyoyang to remove the industry from the cancer: Alerting Internet porcelains to disturb order in the lawyer's coat

Investigation for truth, observation for the stakes

Li Yu-sung, who is a obscurantist, maliciously misconstrued, creates a confrontational mood, beats you in the face with traceable authoritative evidence, then spits on you.

The saying that the dog can't spit ivory in his mouth for over 700 years is about to change labels in this booming Internet era: Lee Woo-sung can't spit ivory in his mouth.

The first documentary evidence of this is in the first revision of the Moniteurian Gaul-Sung-Sung's opera, "Faith to the Emperor," which says: "What's the good thing about this, what's the reason for it, and the dog can't spit ivory teeth out of his mouth."

This is the first and most complete text of our saying today, “Illegible teeth cannot be spitting in the mouth of a dog”, and later popular legend has slowly changed to what is commonly said, “Ivory teeth not being spitting in the mouth of a dog”.

The earlier idea was found in Jindai Kohon, "Parky Clearing House: Tigers don't have a tail, ivory doesn't have a rat's mouth. It means the same logic, not the same kind of thing, and it doesn't make a good thing of it. The next generation, the people have changed the term “poaching” to “dog mouth” and have evolved into this popular folk saying.

As a first generation investigative journalist

Li Woo-sheng said on AI's cipher that Wang Gan-sun is not an investigative journalist, not the first generation of investigative journalists in the country, and not the “Chinese Power Research Reporter”. He also said that Wang Ganzheng was a liar and that he “proclaimed” those titles.

We're still here today, after we hit Lee Woo-sung in the face with traceable authoritative evidence, and then spit on him a little bit.

The determination of whether Wang Ganzheng is an investigative journalist cannot be divorced from the time-line of news history, the open literature of trade journals, and the true context of the development of investigative journalism in a given age. We might wish to keep this matter on track for domestic investigative reporting.

First, a key question needs to be clarified: when does the term “investigating journalists” become formative and popular in the domestic press?

In the 1980s, the concept of “in-depth, critical” reporting was the only one in the country, and the academic community introduced the theory of investigative reporting, but the label “investigating journalist” was not widely used by industry.

It was not until the 1994 Focus Interview, the 1996 News Survey were officially featured, and the Southern Weekend shifted to an in-depth survey feature during the same period, which took root in the country in modern sense, in the paradigm of international “investigative reporting”.

It is well-known in the media circles that the mid-1990s were the starting point for China's market-based media investigative journalists, the beginning of what is often said to be the golden generation of investigative journalists. This group of practitioners, who are no longer simple news reporters, will need to travel on their own to the front line, to multiple parties, to cross-check evidence, to face complex leads, to focus on public opinion and to independently complete investigative reports.

(a) Time spectral distribution: the first generation of investigative journalists in the country, who were involved in the first line of public opinion monitoring and investigation interviews in the 1990s; The new generation of investigative journalists who entered the post-2000 era and caught up with the wave of investigative reporting. This division is a long-established, conventional industry consensus in the old media circles, and is not a free-on-the-job argument.

Wang Ganjun's starting point for journalism is falling at this critical point in the 1990s. In the early years, journalists worked in Sichuan local media, working on long-term public opinion monitoring, following the operational logic of investigative reporting, travelling to the field to gather evidence and dig leads, and fully matching the first generation of investigations into the characteristics and operating patterns of journalists. He was not a regular running reporter who had changed his post to a deep report, and from the beginning of his career, he had made investigation supervision the main thrust of his own reporting.

Visiting Journalist's Archives

Let's talk about the term "Chinese Power Research Reporter" as well. The answer is clear: the name is not Wang Gan-soo himself “self-proclaimed”.

In 2006, at a golden time in the development of domestic investigative journalism, the authoritative news industry journal Young Journalists published a report entitled “The Journalist”, which was originally quoted in the title of the interview by Anhui Watch on 13 August 2006 on the “Reporters' Archives” with Wang Ganzhu, an investigative journalist, who was introduced by the Chinese Power Research Journalists; On 16 November of the same year, the report was reproduced through the People ' s Network and made available to the public.

(a) Angry Watching “Reporters' Files” was the only feature of the country at that time that featured journalists, and Young Journalists, a regular and authoritative professional publication in the field of national news dissemination, was distributed to national journalists and the press; The People ' s Network, a central news site, reproduces the content of the trade journal itself as a public mining letter and dissemination of the content of the report, as well as of the evaluation of the text.

This is not the "single-sing" of Lee Woo-sung, or the private praises of friends, or the labels that are attached to the media, but rather the public-sector evaluations made by professional news journals and reproduced by authoritative platforms during the period of the development of investigative journalism. This document is an objective and verifiable authoritative public history, with links in the original language, time for publication and documented.

Li Woo-sung classified Wang Gan-sun as a “ordinary journalist”, a statement that confused the break-down tracks within journalists. Journalists themselves have a wide division of labour: current and political journalists, literary and academic journalists, financial and economic journalists, clerical journalists, runaway journalists, investigative journalists, job paths, logic, and the risks they take are very different.

The average journalist is more likely to be scheduled to complete the chosen topics and to interview the intended audience; Investigative journalists, however, often have to take the initiative to dig up hidden leads, to compare evidence and to confront conflicting arguments, which cannot be simply equated.

We are not saying that a label can represent the value of all, a journalist, and ultimately the very beginning of his output, his hard work. Respect for historical truths and for open literature are prerequisites for rational discussion.

(b) The time line for domestic investigative coverage: Wang Gan, starting in the 1990s, began to monitor the investigative coverage of the public opinion, which was the first generation of investigative journalists in the industry consensus; The evaluation of the “power investigation journalist” was based on professional news journals, reproduced by the People's Network and retained as a traceable, verifiable industry determination.

A tumor in a lawyer's coat

In the great Internet era, this man, Li Woo-sung, sent less than 10 videos with a newly registered video number, turning this folklore into his own. We can only change our name from that: "Sen Lee can't spit ivory in his mouth."

Because he's been on the Internet, you know there's a man named Lee Woo-sung. He was a lawyer and a prominent mediaman, and he had written articles to teach him the same thing as the famous Beijing lawyer, Zhou Zhou Zi, Peng Zi Ping.

It is common saying that the first-born calf is not afraid of tigers, but the stinking haba dog, who dares to let go of his horse and loses his “position” after several rounds of fighting.

Li Woo-sung was very concerned about his parents' great initiative and gave him a name of a coward, and he had a micro-intelligence public sign, registered with different identity cards, which was the tune of "Li Woo-sung".

Li Woo-sung has long made aggressive statements and he has been duly rewarded for his lack of immediate bites on his appetite from discussions in the community. Last year, he personally told me that on the same day his six public figures had been “permanently sealed” on the platform.

For a long time, Li Woo-sung used the circle of friends as a battlefield, complaining about something, and was complaining about it. There is also a saying in the folk that the stinking meat is stale, that there is a mother crow around Lee Woo-Sung, that the daily screens of Li Woo-Sung's friends, that he sends his own public number, that he has double-digit access, and that he has a sense of psychological and physical pleasure.

After all this time, we haven't introduced the great God's public identity. In 2023, Li Woo-sung passed the judicial examination and obtained the qualifications of a lawyer, and in February 2026 he was transferred to the Beijing law firm.

A People's Network authoritative coverage

For three years, the authoritative judicial platform, the Chinese Network of Judicatures and the North Taifabao, has been unable to access the records of a case that was concluded by Li Woo-sung acting as a court of law.

The newly registered video number, Li Woo-Sung, not only casts a black light and physically attacks Wang Gan, but also takes the famous articles from the media, Hui, in a hypocrical manner, and in a hymn, creates a confrontational mood, through rumours, aimed at disrupting the Internet order and physical attacks.

Moreover, Li Woo-sung took money from Liu-Leng, but not only failed to honour her “post-off” promise, but also, through the Ai video, exposed her personal privacy in large numbers and attacked the “might-woman” who had brought down Hu Guo-Chang in extremely vicious language.

Li Woo-sung's video number is publicly called paid video, post, and is dedicated to defending rights, but has not yet shown the two-dimensional code of collection.

Li Woo-sung and his little “party friends” have been jumping for days now that the cyber-mafia forces are being targeted. In the long run, his fate should not be as simple as a “permanent seal”. We'll just ride a donkey and read the song.

The Beijing Pilgrim Club should not turn a blind eye to the “lawyers” who pollute the Internet, hidden behind computers. Li Woo-sung had publicly told people that his lawyer's card was hanging at Beijing Beiwon Law Office, that he did not care about the red book, and that his main occupation was to make money by postings and making videos online.

Li Woo-sung, a cancer in the coat of “lawyer”, should have taken the “surgeon” from Beijing.

Keep your eyes on the 2-dimensional scale.