The medical accident has been recognized as "the main responsibility of the doctor", the family continues to defend rights and many people are taken away and detained.

The medical accident of Ningbo "Lohhi" in February this year had an official responsibility conclusion: the death of the five-month-old Chilohhi was identified as a grade A medical accident, the doctor bears the main responsibility, the master doctor was revoked the practice certificate, and the public security organs also investigated the relevant doctors. However, after more than six months, the public focus of the case has shifted from "whether there is a fault in the hospital" to "how the family continues to defend the rights, and how the police handle the rights defenders."

Overseas Chinese collective protest recording project "Yesterday" on September 15 family public information said that during September 10 to 15, Zhou Loei's father, Zhou Loei's grandfather, grandparents and one of the netizens who went to Ningbo solidarity family were taken away or controlled by the public security; among them, Zhou Loei's grandmother and netizens "Mei Yuan" were detained for "hindering public affairs" for administrative 5 days.

*Medical responsibility has been confirmed, and the defence has not ended.

The notification released by the Ningbo Municipal Government Investigation Group on February 5 confirmed that the incident belongs to the A-level medical accident, and the medical party bears the main responsibility. the notification also pointed out that the medical quality and safety management system in the hospital involved is not perfect, the risk prevention and emergency treatment is insufficient, the patient's communication is not able; Chen Muiang, the main doctor, has been revoked the doctor's practice certificate, the hospital's many heads have been punished, and the Ningbo Municipal Health Commission has also been ordered to rectify due to insufficient treatment.

This conclusion means that the family’s initial core questioning about serious problems in the medical process is not empty. But the responsibility recognition has not ended the family’s claims. The family then continued to publicise around medical records, identification procedures, criminal prosecutions and other liability issues, and continued to disclose progress through online platforms.

* September's focus shifted to police disposal

According to the "Yesterday" project, citing public information from the family of Deng Xiaoping and others, on September 13, the grandmother of Xiaoping from Anhui to Ningbo to visit the son of Xiaoping and was injured and hospitalized with the police; on the evening of September 14, Xiaoping was taken away, on the same day, the grandmother of Xiaoping, grandmother, grandmother, grandmother and netizens "Yellow Bag" were also taken away by the public security. by September 15, the grandmother and "Yellow Bag" were sentenced to administrative detention for 5 days, some other family members were released after being controlled for about 24 hours.

These circumstances are currently mainly from family and supporters public information, Ningbo public security has not yet issued a full public notice on this round of disposal. Therefore, the outside world is currently unable to learn from the official materials of the specific acts of so-called "interference with public affairs", on-site law enforcement records, the facts based on the punishment decision, and the specific cases of the "open casino crime" in which Zhou Yuan was monitored.

* “Obstruction of official duties” administrative detention needs to correspond to specific acts

The new Law on Public Security Administration Penalties, which will be implemented in 2026, stipulates that acts such as obstructing state organs' employees from performing their duties in accordance with the law, forcing them to break into the alarm belts, alert zones or inspection points set by public security organs, may be punished by public security; and those who prevent people's police from performing their duties in accordance with the law, shall be severely punished.

But the law also requires administrative punishment based on specific facts and procedures. For such cases of high concern, judging whether punishment is legal, the key is not "whether the defenders are emotionally agitated", but the public security organs have identified what specific behavior, whether there is a law enforcement record, which law the punishment decision letter cites, whether the punished person has the opportunity to defend and remedy.

Family rights advocacy has been ongoing for a year, and networking has become the main public channel

The “Little Lohhi” incident began in November 2025 and has caused public attention across the country. Due to cases involving infant deaths, hospital responsibilities, medical records and monitoring, family members have long been publicly available via microblogs, short videos and other social platforms. Lohhi’s mother Dung Rong Rong’s microblog account has a large number of followers, and its public speech has also become an important source of knowledge about the case.

Since this year, offline solidarity and online dissemination related to the case have raised controversy several times.Overseas platforms and civilian recorders have continued to store live videos that have been deleted or difficult to retrieve for a long time by mainstream media in China, making public records of the case not entirely dependent on official notifications.

The relationship between the police and rights defenders needs to go back from the “position conflict” to the procedural issue

From the legal level, the police can, of course, investigate the alleged violations of the law in accordance with the law; the rights of the family does not mean that any behavior is naturally exempt from legal constraints. but in a case where the hospital has been confirmed to bear the main responsibility, the family continues to seek further responsibility, if the public security organs take further measures to monitor the core family and supporters, residence, administrative detention, etc., there will be a higher public explanation.

In particular, Liu Xiaobo was accused of accepting a ten-year bank spill investigation and suspected of "opening a casino crime" part, if the case does have independent evidence, it should be clearly distinguished from the medical accident defence rights itself; if the investigation with its continued defence rights exists a close link in time, the public security organs need to avoid the external world through the open, verifiable facts to form the question of "repressing the defence with other crimes".

There are currently two parallel chains of responsibility in the case

Article one is the chain of responsibility for medical accidents: hospitals, doctors, health departments and subsequent criminal investigation. Officials have confirmed the level of medical accidents and handled several responsible persons, whether the relevant criminal cases are prosecuted and how they are judged must continue to be observed.

Article 2 is the chain of responsibility for the defense of rights: the calling, control, administrative detention and surveillance measures taken by the Ministry of Public Security and the Ningbo Public Security System on family members and supporters. The two chains of responsibility should not be confused. the hospital has a fault, does not represent the family's any actions are legal; in turn, the public security investigation of other suspicions of violation of law, nor can the family's legitimate claims for subsequent responsibility for medical accidents be automatically dissolved.

The best way to restore public confidence in the Lohhi case is not to keep the controversy in short videos and rumors, but to have documents that can be verified at every node of the procedure: administrative detention decisions, surveillance of residence legal documents, suspected criminal facts, criminal investigation progress, and subsequent judicial handling of medical accident-related cases.

When the death of a five-month-old baby has been officially recognized as a medical accident of the highest degree, the family’s subsequent defence process should also be recorded within the framework of the rule of law.