Two years ago, Chongqing high-tech district seventy-year-old disabled old man was beaten by three people, seven ribbons fractures, after heavy fractures, finally criminal case, suspect Nguyen Mou was taken for custody trial, is a step forward. but the case has a question: two other people involved in beating the elderly person, so far has not clearly dealt with the conclusion, the progress of the investigation, whether to prosecute, the victim's family has no knowledge.
Three people jointly carry out injuries, belonging to the common crime. Many people act, the consequences of injuries overlap, only cause severe injuries of the elderly seven rib fracture, the consequences of the level of minor injuries, is the result of the common actions of all the violent persons. Now only one of them is processed, the remaining two participants dealing with the state is unresolved, the heart of the family is difficult to solve.
Many people, in public places, openly beaten, seventy years old disabled persons malicious violence cases, the suspect can easily handle insurance trial, this belongs to the professional issue of public security cases, we still choose to continue to believe that the public security organs can fairly and fairly handle cases in accordance with the law.
The public and the victim’s families are more concerned about whether the other two persons are insufficient in evidence to be prosecuted, whether the investigation is ongoing or whether a security penalty will be imposed if the criminal liability is not prosecuted.
The elderly is a disabled person who is 70 years old, faced with three perpetrators, belonging to one of the vulnerable parties. The case is not easy to correct from the previous disposal deviation, the criminal case is not easy. If the perpetrators cannot all identify and separate responsibilities, only to handle one of them, the facts of the case is not complete, neither to restore the whole case passed, nor to benefit the elderly's subsequent rights. All perpetrators, whether criminal prosecution or security punishment, should be given a clear statement.
The public security branch of the Chongqing District shall respond in writing to the investigation of the other two persons involved in the case, comprehensively examine all the persons involved, differentiate their respective responsibilities, and promote the criminal prosecution in accordance with the law, which does not constitute a criminal offence, shall also be punished according to the Law on Public Security Administration Punishment according to the serious circumstances.
If the public security organs do not handle the persons to be prosecuted, the case will be transferred to the prosecutor's examination and prosecution stage, the family members will apply to the prosecutor's office for investigation and supervision, the prosecutor's office will apply to the prosecutor's office to supervise the public security to supplement the investigation, verify the criminal facts of the other two participants, and demand that all persons involved be disposed of according to law.
The criminal case is just the beginning of justice, not the end. The criminal case can not be handled halfway and halfway. Hopefully the high-tech district public security department can face the family's doubts, clear the facts, responsibilities, handling of the three perpetrators to one, give the injured Seventh-century disabled elderly a complete and transparent case response, so that every person who is injured, bear the legal responsibility.

Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…