The police officer's wife reported her name to the District Commissioner and was charged with four counts.

On 16 September, the case against Zhao Junjie, the police sister-in-law, was heard in the Siping County Court of Henan Province in Ma ' aung City. A year ago, when Zhao Junjie built a house on his home land to two levels, local businessmen called it a “holy land” and demanded that your husband Liu Ho Nam be killed if he did not hand over the land.

Liu Ho Nam, Deputy Director of the Sipin District Public Security Bureau, who had come from the first line of investigation and had been awarded three degrees of credit, was detained for less than 10 days after the conflict.

Liu Ho Nam. Network Map Source

The Sorbs, who then became “Saviors”, claimed to be close to the Disciplinary Commission's case handlers, could influence the case and even interview the person in person and reveal the details of the case.

After refusing to give in, Zhao Zhongjie, who had reported the case to the District Disciplinary Commission and the officers involved, became a suspect within 16 days, and was eventually charged with the concealment of accounting documents and the transfer of funds from the State party. The accused, the units that were killed, were tried in a different manner. In their view, this is not an ordinary case of economic crime, but a retaliatory prosecution that begins with “throwing for a husband”.

01

A land-induced conflict

Liu Ho Nam has served in the public security bureau of Siping County for many years. According to public information, he entered the public security system in 2003 and has been working on a long-term investigation, successively as deputy police chief, deputy lieutenant and lieutenant of the criminal investigation squadron, followed by the director of the police station in Parao and the deputy director of the police station in Siping County.

He was awarded a third degree of personal credit on four occasions and was awarded several awards by the City Public Security Bureau and was awarded the “Prempt Guard of the Public Security Organs of Henan Province” “the city-wide elite people's police”.

Zhao Junjie and Liu Ho Nam were registered for marriage in June 2021, both remarried. Zhao Junjie had long been engaged in real estate business before the marriage.

Zhao Junjie developed one of the projects. Ichioka Ying-chul!

According to Cho ' s mother, Tsui Qinge, what happened later began with a land conflict at the end of May

1. Seo Qinge stated that Zhao Junjie was building a house on a land he had purchased himself, which had been built on two floors.

“The local businessman came to see the land after the country was founded and asked Zhao Zhu Zongjie to transfer it to him. "Suh Qingye said.

In a subsequent report by his real name, Zhao Junjie stated that Zhao Zheng had threatened her with death if she did not hand over the land, not only her husband Liu Hoonan would be killed, but also your family. She refused to do so.

Since then, the public security and territorial authorities have repeatedly pressured her to stop working. She considered that the project had been approved through the local formal process and refused to stop work. She was then asked to meet again, to stop her work and to transfer the project to him, and was again refused.

"Let's stop, is that what leadership means, or what you mean? Zhao Junjie asked, "The founding of the State is what he meant, and then what he called leadership.

Less than 10 days later, Liu Ho Nam was held in detention on 5 June 2025.

02

The Sorceress claims to be able to save lives

After Liu Ho Nam was taken, Zhao Junjie was asked to relinquish the land to build her country and appeared before her in a position to provide good offices to save her.

According to Zhao Junjie, Liu Ho Nam was detained the day that he called her twice to ask her to come and talk. The following morning, she went to meet up with her partner and asked, "Do you know why I called you twice yesterday? “You will not speak.”

“The State-building of Zhao Zheng claimed that I had no use finding anyone else but him to save Liu Ho Nam. Zhao Junjie said that he had subsequently called the officer in charge of the case, Han De Xing, who had promised to meet him.

Zhao Junjie also stated that he had previously demonstrated his close ties to the Hand of the Nation and that he was often visited for food and drink; His relationship with the District Secretary is also “special iron” and he will do whatever he says.

The Western Ping District Disciplinary Commission Supervisory Board. Ichioka Ying-chul!

At noon on 6 June, the State of Zhao contacted Zhao Junjie again, first to get her to the office at 1.30 p.m. and then to send a message at 2 p.m. When Zhao Junjie arrived, Handerseng and others left at lunch at the State-building office in Zhao.

Zhao Junjie stated that Zheng Zheng State-building had subsequently told her about Liu Ho Nam ' s case and that Hendix had told him that Liu Ho Nam had been reported to include a long-term visitor and three individuals in Liu Ho Nam ' s unit.

She immediately said, "If Liu Ho Nam really has something, we will. If not, I won't admit it. “The nation-building claims that to kill a person, it takes more than two notes to convict him or her.

“If so, wouldn't Liu Ho Nam have been killed by them even if he had not? Zhao Junjie asks. And the other side said, "Yes, that's the result. The blogger adds:

The State-building party subsequently indicated that it would communicate with District Secretary Yong Li. On the afternoon of 9 June, he further told her that he was in her office at 5:17 p.m. that day talking about the Liu Ho Nam case with the Secretary of the Commission, who he called “boss”.

A person who had threatened to stop her work and asked to take over the project claimed to be able to interview the case officer, to know the details of the case and even to influence the husband ' s situation. Zhao Junjie therefore had strong doubts about the process.

The mother of Zhao Junjie also reported that he had been convicted of death and death in the early years of nation-building as a result of land competition, and that he had been released from prison and had been involved in real estate business and had close ties with local disciplinary officers. She describes the nation-building as “no one dares to mess with the West Ping County”.

On 22 June 2025, Zhao Junjie filed an application for the intervention of a higher authority in the examination of the husband ' s case. On 25 June, she published a letter on the Internet, calling out the grievances of Liu Ho Nam and reporting to Secretary General Li Yong, staff member Han De Shing and to the police station in Xiping County.

Zhao Junjie publicly reported. Interviewees

In a public report, Zhao Junjie questioned whether the case had been disclosed to the State of Zhong Jian and whether this relationship would affect the fair conduct of the Liu Ho Nam case.

03

Reporter's second suspect

The day after Zhao Junjie made her public, the Siping County Disciplinary Commission (SCP) handed over her criminal information to the public security authorities. Only 16 days elapsed between the public reporting and the opening of a criminal case on 11 July.

Xu Qingjie stated that after her daughter had been in danger of being her husband, the employees of her company were summoned to the police station in Siping County for investigation. Some of the employees were threatened and told that “No bites will be made, or they will not leave the public security department”. She considers that these investigations were facilitated by Secretary of the Commission, Yong Li, and were intended to attack and retaliate against relatives for their rights.

According to Xu Qinge, shortly after his arrest, Liu Peng Fei, the lawyer at the horse shop, brought a copy of the book of repentance written in advance, and told her to follow Li Yong's words: “If you copy this book of repentance, you will be allowed to go home. The blogger adds:

Jo believed this statement and then the Book of Repent was handed over by Liu Peng Fei to Li Yong. Seo Qingyei said that Li Yong had repeatedly testified to Zhao Zhu Zhu Zhu Zhu Jie ' s error in response to a question from the senior management concerned.

The book of repentance was later brought to the trial for discussion. The defence lawyer Wang Xing has not stated that, after Zhao Junjie was detained, the investigators had requested her to acknowledge that the report was made up on the grounds that she was “the leader very angry” and had promised “that the leader would let you out when he was calm”. Zhao Junjie wrote the " Book of repentance " and handed it over to the public security authorities by a local lawyer, but was not released thereafter.

Wang Xing did not claim that the material was used in response to a superior investigation into the matter. He asked whether the content of the report was genuine and why no explicit treatment had been given to the matter of the report or the alleged false report.

It appears to Seo Ki-hye that the daughter copied the " Book of repentance ", which was used to refute her previous reports, in the belief that she would be released.

"Li Yong's reason for my daughter's arrest is private, but the seal is fine and revenge is real. She also described her experience of travelling to Beijing to take her car from the garage at night to seek justice for her daughter.

After a night drive, she was stopped by police officer Sipin at a checkpoint on the south side of Beijing. The other took her documents and the information she had reported, and asked her to return south with her car and not to proceed north. At around 7 p.m., she returned to her home and the public security authorities sent someone to confirm her return.

“We've been watched every move. "Suh Qingjie believes that the channel for the presentation of claims to the Kyoto authorities has been blocked. In her complaint, she named Li Yong and Hande-sung and asked the authorities to investigate the abuse of authority, among others.

04

From a stamp to four counts

Criminal prosecution against Zhao Junjie, starting with two photographs of the " Leaning ".

According to the defence lawyer Kim Yi, the inspection authorities seized a tablet of Zhao Junjie during the investigation of Liu Ho Nam, from which two photographs of the loan note, one with a stamp and one without a stamp, were extracted.

The dispute surrounding the debt, the Borrow and the seals has long been investigated. Counsel states that the matter was investigated by the local public security authorities in 2021 and dropped by the prosecution in 2023.

On 11 July 2025, the Public Security Directorate of Sipin County opened a case against Zhao Junjie on suspicion of forgery of the company ' s seal. Since then, the scope of investigations has gradually expanded.

Public Security Bureau of Siping County. Ichioka Ying-chul!

The investigating authority first investigates who is actually in control of the West Ping County Real Estate Development Company Ltd. (hereinafter “Walong Company”) and the financial flows from the company's bank loans and loans; The purchase and sale contract, the real estate register, the mortgage information of Zhao Junjie and the persons involved were subsequently transferred, and the company ' s invoices, books and accounting documents were reviewed.

(a) When the case is first referred for review and prosecution, it is returned to the public security authorities for additional investigation; After retransfer, they are returned for a second time to the Additional Investigation. Until May 2026, the Public Prosecutor ' s Office of West Ping County filed a public prosecution.

* The original criminal proceedings were initiated for the forgery of the seal of the company,* and without charge, and Zhao Junjie was charged with four counts: the concealment of accounting documents and books of account; (b) The offence of loan transfer at a high cost; (a) The offence of falsely denominated tickets;

• Criminalization of misappropriation of office.

On the eve of the trial, the defender Kim wrote in social media: “I often feel a sense of weakness, especially when there are serious violations and when it is clear, but the case handlers are not doing anything, simply trying to finish the procedure, not solve it. The blogger adds:

He maintains that the case against Zhao Junjie should not continue to be tried by the judicial authorities of Siping County. To this end, he filed a complaint with the Public Prosecutor ' s Office, submitted a dissenting opinion and evidence of jurisdiction to the relevant judicial authorities and sought assistance in the defence of his rights from the Council of the League of the Attorney-General and the Judicial Service, but the issue remained unresolved.

05

The accused and the victim requested a different trial

On 16 September 2026, the Zhao Junjie case was heard at the Sipin County Court. According to the minutes of the hearing, the first day of the trial was mainly about jurisdiction and recusal. Zhao Junjie and his advocate, and the lawyer representing the company Wah Yong, who was identified as the “victim unit”, requested that the case be removed from Western Ping.

Li Hsiung-Hin, Li, the lawyer representing the Walloon Company, submitted that the Indictment did not identify the units that had been killed, from the investigation to the examination of the prosecution, nor did the company participate in the proceedings as the unit that had been killed, and the prosecution did not hear its opinion. The company was not notified of being a “victim” of the case until after the three pre-court meetings, and two representing counsel participated for the first time on the day of the hearing.

Zhao Junjie ' s status in the company was also one of the contentious aspects of the trial. The presiding judge asked what position she held at the Walloon Company, and she replied: “I do not know now. She explained that the Prosecutor's statements about his identity had changed during the pre-court meeting, “You ask the Prosecutor what I am”.

Ziping County Public Prosecutor ' s Office. Ichioka Ying-chul!

Li Wenga stated that the Indictment Part called Zhao Junjie “head of the company”, that she “controls” the company in the false bill of exchange and that she was “the physical custodian” of the financial documents in the concealment of the accounting certificate, without clarifying whether she was a company employee, what position she held and what her powers were.

Counsel submits that since she was accused of using her position to facilitate the appropriation of company property, the specific content of what is called “service accommodation” should be explained and the expression of identity cannot be changed as the need arises for different offences.

With regard to the initiation of the case, Zhao Junjie and his lawyer repeatedly referred to the points of time at which the report was made public, the following day ' s referral, and the 16 days after the case was opened, questioning the link between the complaint and the prosecution and demanding that a fair trial be guaranteed by a change of jurisdiction and the implementation of the system of recusal.

The company ' s counsel further stated that the charges initially filed were not prosecuted, while the four offences prosecuted were not dealt with in the respective filing documents. The sources of the case were also not consistent: reports were registered that “civilian police officers found themselves in the course of their work”, that “the first interrogations were conducted with a lead from a superior”, and that the search referred to the leads handed over by the Disciplinary Monitoring Board.

Counsel also claims that Zhao Junjie was repeatedly questioned in the interrogation notes about the video, live statements, the subject of the complaint and the author of the complaint. They asked the investigating authorities to explain how these issues related to the alleged economic crimes.

The court heard a challenge to the search procedure. She claims that the officer who worked the case did not show her the procedure of a search warrant, etc., and asked her to open the entire door, and then to take her to the case centre, leaving an investigator to continue the search. The search also revealed that she had been prepared to report new material to the local Director of Public Security, Li.

She also notes that Liu Ho Nam was directly subordinate to the pilot who was involved in the investigation. Kim Jin-yi also stressed that some of the investigators were former colleagues and even subordinates of Liu Ho Nam.

Liu Ho Nam has been working for 22 years at the public security bureau in Siping County and is now responsible for investigating, prosecuting and trying his wife is the local judiciary. The defence considers that this professional relationship, together with Zhao Junjie ' s reporting of persons involved in the local case, makes it necessary for the case to be handled by a judicial authority outside Siping County.

“This is a group of acquaintances who decide whether Liu Ho Nam's wife is guilty of a crime. Li Wenja says.

After the afternoon session, lawyer Lee Hsien informed the court of a new situation: according to the legal representative of the Walloon Company, after the morning hearing, the police of the public security bureau of Siping County called again to ask him to “cooperate with the investigation”. He was investigated during the investigation phase and written notes were produced.

Li Jun-hyun questioned the basis on which the case had been opened and the public security organs continued to investigate the evidence themselves. Kim Gyeong requested that the individual case handlers, the reasons for the investigation and the case in question be identified and, together with the company ' s acting counsel, requested the prosecutor to perform his legal supervisory duties and to provide a clear response.

Xu Qingyei also recorded some details of the trial: the prosecutor, Hui Wei, closed her eyes several times during the morning and afternoon sessions, several of which she believed had fallen asleep.

In the final stages of the trial, Kim Kuo again argued that the subject of the complaint by Zhao Junjie was directly linked to the authorities that had facilitated the case, which was the central reason for the continued application by the parties and the defence for disqualification and for a change of jurisdiction. He read out the previous application and the article on the report, asking why she had filed a complaint against her local officer and the criminal proceedings against her were initiated.

“If this case does not apply to disqualification and promotion, it is not known what other cases are capable of application (these provisions). "The gold is said."

06

"You take this indictment and accuse me of breaking my conscience? The government has been working on the issue of the human rights of women.

On 17 September, the next day the trial was still conducted around jurisdiction and recusal. Counsel Kim Yong, Wang Xing did not challenge the lack of prosecution of the persons involved, the amount audited, the investigative procedure and the content of the indictment, asked the Public Prosecutor and the public prosecutor ' s office of Siping County to recuse themselves and again applied for removal of the case from Xiping.

Kim Li first noted that in the Indictment Opinion of the Public Security Organs, Wei was an important participant in the various acts involved. In the case of the allegations of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of a loan of interest to Liu, it is Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei Wei We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We We,

West Ping County Court. Ichioka Ying-chul!

However, when the indictment of the prosecution service was filed, Wei was not charged and was not stated as “other cases”, but the responsibility was attributed to Zhao Junjie.

The court in Kim’s court read the interview notes of four bank staff members, stating that the statements of the third party witnesses were consistent with the point that Wei Chi Minh was the actual controller of Walloon and that the loan involved was linked to the bank, signed in-person and provided guarantees. The defence therefore questioned whether the prosecution had examined the conduct and responsibility of the individual involved in the case in its entirety and whether there had been any selective recourse.

The Audit Report, which was the basis for the amounts alleged to be a high-interest loan transfer, was also identified as having been subject to arithmetical errors. Kim stated that the “lending of interest payments to Zhao's capital bank” in the schedule in the Henan report included five entries, but that the first amount of $11,2939.20 was missing in total, which calculated interest expenditures, which should have been over $344,000, to be over $231,000, and the corresponding “profit” of Zhao Junjie was over $1129,000.

In addition, the indictment has written the name of the audit body “Blanc” into “Big Hway”. The defence considers that these problems reflect the lack of necessary verification by the prosecution of the amount of the conviction and its basis.

In terms of the procedure for commissioning audits and evaluations, Kim stated that both Validation Letters of Engagement were set aside on 25 March 2026, but that the information note issued earlier by the public security organs had stated that the “accreditation” of the relevant institutions was still ongoing; The main body of the B.I.A.A. also appeared on the dates of 16 January and 25 March. He therefore questioned whether there was a problem of first-instance and then-substitute commissioning.

In relation to the valuation of the two villas involved, Kim also submitted that the public security organs directly commissioned the commercial evaluation company to produce a report that would be subject to review in the province of Henan in accordance with the procedural requirements for determining the price of the property involved.

The unusual nature of the search procedures and the interrogation notes was another issue of contention on the same day.

According to Kim, only the fact sheet, which was subsequently supplemented by investigators, documented a search of Zhao ' s residence and the Walloon Company, and the failure to find an accounting book without a search warrant, a search transcript, a seizure list and a simultaneous recording. Wang Xing did not ask further what basis would be used to conclude that the accounting documents were hidden by Zhao Junjie in the absence of a complete record of the search and the accounting records that had not been traced?

Kim also noted that two records were in the file at the same time, in the same place and with identical content " * " * Interrogation Notes " *. A note stating that the person questioned was YI Yuan and Li Yuan, at the end, that the person questioned had refused to sign; The other one will be changed to Yuan Yaayong, with the end of the note, “I have seen the above, as I said” and the signature of Zhao Junjie.

The defence sought an explanation as to who was conducting the interrogation, whether Zhao Junjie had read and signed the transcript, and why there were discrepancies between the two records. They therefore question the authenticity of the records and whether the prosecution service has fulfilled its supervisory role.

The two defence counsel also stated that the content of the indictment relating to the history of the company, the relationship between Wei and Zhao Junjie had not been retained in the indictment. They consider that the description of the company's control relationship, property rights and Zhao's actual duties is relevant to the validity of the allegations and cannot be replaced by a general expression such as “utilizing the convenience of the post”.

As to the formation and use of the Rhetoric, Wang Xing has not yet argued that the link between the report and the prosecution needs to be established and that the case should change its jurisdiction.

After the defence had issued its opinion, Zhao Zhu Zhu Zhu Zhu Zhu Zhu Jiehi requested an adjournment of the hearing and continued the hearing after receiving written responses on the matter of disqualification. After the discussion, the Full Court adjourned and announced that it would reply at the opening of the morning session the following morning.

Jo insisted on a written notification and questioned the prosecutor, Wei Hong, in court: “Did you break my conscience by accusing me of such an indictment? What is the weight of the land that you are given by the state? Is that fair to me? The blogger adds:

07

The accused refused to attend the court, which was adjourned to date

After 10.30 a.m. on 18 September, the presiding judge of the trial requested the judicial police to bring Zhao Junjie to court.

After waiting longer, the judicial police reported that four persons had gone to the custody and had failed to take her out. The presiding judge then adjourned the session, with a further notice of the next session.

“Cho Junjie is not not not going to attend the trial. Two days in court, she repeatedly stated that she would not attend the hearing without written answers to the jurisdictional question. She's got it. "Suh Qingye said. In her view, she was shocked by the source of the case, the investigative procedures and the review of the prosecution issues that had been revealed during the two days of the trial.

Zhao Junjie's mother, Seo Qingye. Ichioka Ying-chul!

After the court adjourned, Xu Qingyu submitted a complaint requesting the Prosecutor-General ' s Office in Ma ' ajok to conduct a full review of the prosecution process and the basis for the prosecution, to correct the decision to prosecute in accordance with the law and to investigate the responsibility of the relevant prosecutor in the performance of his duties.

In her complaint, she again submits that the case is of a retaliatory and selective nature. Zhao Junjie ' s report is directly related to the authorities, and the disqualification and change of jurisdiction of the accused, the defence and the “slain unit” of Walloon has not been properly addressed and it is not appropriate for the case to continue to be handled by the judicial authorities of Siping County.

The letter also questioned whether the Office of the Public Prosecutor of West Ping had fulfilled its investigative and supervisory role. In addition to the issues raised during the trial concerning the establishment, search, audit and evaluation of the case, Xu Qingjie stated that the handwritten notebooks on which the conviction was based, the list of loans lacked complete original records of seizure, storage and transfer. She requested that the source of the evidence be verified and asked why the prosecution had not corrected it, but instead found the evidence-gathering procedure in the indictment to be lawful.

As to the failure of Wei Chi Ming to be prosecuted, Xu Qingyei further alleged that he was classified as a suspect by the Public Security Service and that he was “other cases” noted, but that the facts of the charges were removed from the prosecution, Wei was converted to a prosecution witness and three loan loans were rewritten to be carried out by Zhao Junjie alone. She asked for clarification of the basis for that treatment and its outcome.

In terms of the amount of crime, in addition to questioning the audit report's omission of interest costs of over $1129,000, Xu Qingji stated that the report had recorded interest collections of $685 million that had not been actually collected, resulting in a so-called increase in the amount of profits.

After the case was returned to the supplementary investigation twice, the investigation continued to prosecute, in the view of Xu Qingxie, after the investigation of the crime, the liability of other persons and the underlying evidence had not been established. She requested that the higher prosecutor ' s office should have the decision to wrongly prosecute reversed in accordance with the law or that the public prosecutor ' s office in Siping County should have the case corrected or withdrawn; At the same time, judicial responsibility investigations are conducted for the personnel involved in the services, audits and clearances, and the investigation and prosecution of proven violations of the law and the transfer of suspected persons for the commission of offences.

“As a mother, I only ask Zhao Junjie to be tried fairly and impartially in a court of law that has no interest in this case! She wrote at the end of her complaint.

Sundong men found the company liquidated after 10 years of prison sentence

In the village revitalization project supported by the Western County Secretary, the King's Cemetery is hidden in the Iron Boss's grave

The largest illegal mining case in the country triggered a wave of departures of the companies involved and the Chief Executive Officer of the State of Zhongzhou was named as the perpetrator

About the suite, Tom said so.

5 million high-altitude transport bribes continued: late evidence of innocence and 3,000 letters of indictment