Jiangsu second-level senior sheriff Li才玉 namely charged prosecutors: indicated that there were several serious violations of the case procedure

The accuser: Li才玉, man, born in June 1968, Nanjing Municipal Public Security Bureau civilian police, second-level senior sheriff.

Accusation by *

As a result of the "20141209" case, the person was accused of alleged corruption and misconduct, in May 2024 was detained and arrested by the People's Procuratorate of Nanjing City, on September 8, 2025 was sentenced to one year and five months in prison by the People's Court of the Huanxiang District, and on October 3, 2025 was taken into custody.In the investigation and handling of the case, the Nanjing People's Procuratorate Prosecutors Zhu Xiaoyun, Suri Hyun, Zhou Yuan and others disregarded the provisions of the law, implemented a series of serious violations of the law, requested the disciplinary supervision organ, the prosecutor's organs to investigate the accused person's serious violations in the case of alleged corrup

Specifically as follows:

The fact of illegal detention under the name of public security detention, the prosecutor's authority overruns control

From April 28 to May 4, 2024, the Public Security Bureau of Nanjing City took closure measures against the accuser on the grounds of "suspicion of non-performance of duties according to law". before and after the closure, the public security discipline inspection and inspection department did not conduct any investigative conversation with the accused, the closure site was actually controlled by the prosecutor's officers, and the accused can only see the security and prosecutor's officers.

According to Article 48 of the People's Police Law and Article 12 of the Regulations on Supervision of Public Security Organs, detention is the internal disciplinary measures of public security organs, and prosecutors have no statutory authority to take over, execute or review.

(2) Hiding the facts of the criminal case and conducting substantive investigative hearings as "witnesses"

On May 1, 2024, the accused was filed a criminal case by the Nanjing City Prosecutor's Office. The accused was in prison at the time, completely lost personal freedom, there was no legal circumstance obstructing the investigation without notifying, but the accused deliberately concealed the decision to initiate the case, until May 4, only officially announced. During this period, the accused in the name of a "witness" requested the accused to provide testimony, to conduct a conversation, conduct criminal investigation hearing, to "interrogate" as a substitute for the law "interrogation", in violation of articles 120 and 124 of the Criminal Procedure Law, seriously deprived the accuser of the right of information, defense and evasion as a criminal suspect.

(3) Unlawful conduct of restrictive investigative acts prior to the filing of the case

According to Article 109 of the Criminal Procedure Law and the provisions of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office on the filing of cases as the legal starting point for criminal investigation, it is strictly forbidden to take investigative measures restricting personal freedom before filing the case.The accused person before the official filing of the case on May 1, i.e. through the measures of imprisonment, carried out a detention hearing on the accused, in the name of the “witness” investigation, constitutes mutual detention and serious preliminary evidence.

Fourth, persecution induction, refers to persecution confession, the implementation of corporal punishment, illegal evidence collection

During the detention, Zhu Xiaon and others continued to review the accused, threatening to "do not cooperate with, i.e. imprisonment, detention", to use the accused's home urge to return to the psychology, to "cooperate can be disciplinary punishment by the disciplinary committee in the third form, terminate imprisonment in advance" as a seduction, forcing cooperation to sign.

On May 1, 2024, between 15:30 and 16:00, during a conversation with the accuser, Suzhou, Suzhou and Zhejiang, Zhu Xiaon brought the material forced signature order. The accuser clearly stated that the material content did not match the facts, Zhu Xiaon still forced the signature with "no matter, no matter".

At the same time, the accused will be the lock-in place as an illegal investigation and evidence-gathering place, to the accuser to implement inhuman treatment: the supply of food is extremely poor and the number is insufficient, in the morning only two small pancakes, the dinner for a bowl of white rice with a small amount of water boiled dishes; the whole day by two people monitored, forced fixed sitting, long-term restriction of sleep and activity, it is necessary to report, in order to change the body punishment to implement the mental and physical double oppression, forced to obtain a testimony.

V. Handling of breaches and deprivation of quality certificate rights

The plaintiff and the persons of the same case for the same case (dealing with the "2014 1209" case) were accused of corruption, in this case there is no statutory case handling circumstances, the case agency dealt with the violation of the case, and in the first instance rejected the plaintiff's testimony appearance in court, directly violating the mandatory provisions of Article 61 of the Criminal Procedure Law on witness testimony must be present in court, depriving the plaintiff of the right to qualify.

Thirty-six years since the police, the accused has always adhered to the bottom line of the rule of law, fulfilled the statutory duties in accordance with the law, and has never committed criminal offences. The accused has ignored the law, abused the powers, abused the law, violated the case, and suffered significant damage to the accused and family.

In accordance with the law, real-name charges are filed, and the organs at the higher level are requested to adhere to the principle of fact-finding, thoroughly investigate the case, investigate the responsibilities of the persons involved in the violation of the law, and safeguard judicial fairness.

Prosecutor: Li才玉

* August 2026 *

The original information *

Original title: Public complaint in Li才玉案件

Source: WeChat Public Number "WeChat Public Platform"