Why is China's first case of illicit operation of industrial platforms not delayed in trial?

Hangzhou Far Orange Pleasure Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Far Orange Pleasure") Zhang Yuan and other five-person case, since November 2025 by Jiangsu Province Town, Jiangsu City Danang District Prosecutor's Office to the same level court filed a lawsuit, has not yet been held. The case involved amounted to 46.13 billion yuan, a huge wave in the industry.

Long orange pleasurable original office.

Previously, the "cloud account" of the leading enterprise in the industrial industry in the country has not only received the support of the Supreme Law and Supreme Inspection.

This "crime of illegal business prosecution of the spirit-to-work platform case" not only relates to the survival of a private enterprise, but more likely to cast a legal shadow to the industry: According to this * standard *, more than 10,000 similar platforms *, * including the year * business * the scale of more than hundreds of billions * * * the head enterprise *, * * the criminal * risk * *. *

The case was originally scheduled for June 16 this year, but no new arrangements have been made because Zhang Ying and others have announced a postponement because of the "reporting of illegal crimes against national counterparts."

and 01

Illegal business cases triggered by the same transmission case

The public information shows that the registered place and the business site are in Hangzhou, independently developing and operating the "Orange Pay Cloud" engineering platform, the core business is to provide compliance services for industrial enterprises and flexible employment personnel.

On April 9, 2024, in Hangzhou, Dongguan, China, in the 1103th room of Wendy's Center A in Yangtze River, a few of the employees of Long Orange have not opened the computer processing business as usual. They received a public security call and waited quietly in the office.

That afternoon, the actual controller Zhang Yuan, assistant general manager Liu Mou Huang, and the operating head Cao Mou Wang were taken away from the investigation.

Zhang Huang is the founder of Long Orange Comfort. Starting with the construction of the "Orange Pay Cloud" in 2022, he took two years to use this platform to the annual business size of billions of yuan.

On the same day, Zhang was detained in criminal custody, but was eventually arrested on November 3, 2025.

The quiet of the distant orange was broken by a distribution case hundreds of kilometers away.In early 2024, the Danish Branch of the Town's Public Security Bureau investigated a distribution case called the Treasure Box Plan.

The Danish Public Security Bureau, Zhang Dream

Related information shows that the King's House, Shen Qing and others discussed the development of the "treasure box plan", the members' rental of mobile phones on the "TIKTOK" platform (international version of the "Tremble" APP) to browse the video of treasure box harvesting, live broadcasting of goods generating profits, attracting members' investment, relying on the development of the bottom line to form the 31st level, absorb funds of more than 55.95 million yuan.

While tracking the flow of funds from the Treasury Plan, the Danish police discovered that the bank accounts of Long Orange Hanoi subsidiary had been used to issue rewards. In January 2024, the account was frozen. In March of the same year, the Danish branch investigated Long Orange Hanoi for illegal business crimes.

In November 2025, the Danang District Prosecutor's Office filed a prosecution in the Danang District Court, accusing five people, including Zhang Super, of suspected illegal business crimes.

2nd *

After paying $17 million to secure questioned "fishing in the far ocean"

The most striking controversy in the case process is the question of jurisdiction, and thus raises a strong question of “large ocean fishing” and “favorable law enforcement.”

According to the material provided by the family of the parties, the Danish police department in the investigation of another transfer case, found that the involved persons used the account of the Long Orange Dynamics Company to issue rewards, then "Shuo Tzu Gua" to the company to file a case, but the fact that the company and Zhang Super never paid to the Danish district members in the transfer case, with the case has nothing to do with.

“The Danish branch broke through the jurisdictional filing investigation only because of an indirect flow of funds in the transfer case, suspected of ‘high ocean fishing’.”The family of the parties questioned that the Remote Fishing is registered and operated in Hangzhou, and all employees and executives reside in Hangzhou. The company has not conducted any business in Tangzhou, has no local customers in Tangzhou, has no substantial association with Tangzhou, and has not paid funds to any personnel in Tangzhou.

According to the materials provided by the family of the parties, after the case was filed by the Danish police, a total of seven executives and employees of Long Orange Comfort and channel merchants were detained, so that General Manager Zhang Yuan, Assistant General Manager Liu Mou Huang and Operations Leader Cao Yuan signed a confession record, and the three were asked to pay more than 10 million yuan to the public security to be taken into custody after the trial.

The Danish District Prosecutor’s Office. 张梦云

The "Six strict prohibitions" of the public security organs in cooperation with other public security organs in 2020 and the "Seven provisions" of the public security organs for the prohibition of law enforcement by profit in 2021 are clearly prohibited from transferring, transferring accounts, paying money or otherwise confiscating the assets involved in the case.

Since 2024, the phenomenon of "high ocean fishing" has attracted a high level of attention from the central to local level. In March 2025, the Supreme Inspectorate carried out "special judicial supervision of illegal law enforcement and illegal law enforcement" in the national prosecutor's office, and relied on the "12309 China Prosecutor's Network" to open special supervision zones. In April 2025, the Ministry of Public Security issued the "Regulations on the jurisdiction of public security organs in criminal cases involving enterprises across provinces", in an attempt to curb criminal law enforcement from the system.

and 03

*Do you need to pay for a license to use the platform?

In addition to procedural issues such as jurisdiction, the core entity dispute in this case is whether the platform needs to obtain a "payment business license"?

The prosecutor's accusation logic is that the platform is engaged in the settlement of "public transfer and private" funds, belongs to the payment settlement business, and fails to obtain the payment license, that is, constitutes an illegal business crime.

"The model is a new business model encouraged by the state to share the economy, solve the industry pain of enterprises to make use of labor compliance settlement, flexible employees legally pay taxes."The family of the parties said that the country's similar platform includes many state-owned enterprises and industry-headed enterprises, are the key objects of local government hiring investment.

In 2017, the Supreme Prosecutor's Office stated in the Symposium Report on Internet Financial Crimes that the determination of illegal business crimes of the settlement nature of funds should fully consider the equivalence of specific acts and similar crimes in the field of social harm and the need for criminal punishment, and strictly grasp the criteria for conviction and conviction.

In 2019, the head of the Supreme Criminal Court and the Supreme Inspection Legal Policy Research Department on the judicial explanation of criminal cases involving underground money house also asked the reporter, "Illegally engaged in money payment settlement business, mainly illegal elements through the establishment of an empty shell company, using internet bank transfer and other methods, to assist others to illegally transfer public accounts to private accounts, collect cash and other illegal payment settlement."

“Orange Pay Cloud” platform business model. respondents provided

According to the family of the parties, there are huge differences in the purpose of establishment, the source of funds, the basis of transactions, the use of accounts, behavioral characteristics, the flow of funds, the acceptance of supervision and so on.

"The country's more than 10,000 similar platforms, including the annual settlement scale of more than 100 billion "cloud account" and other head enterprises, have not obtained a payment license, the government has never asked for such platforms to obtain a payment license.""The family of the parties said, " Spiritual utility platforms are all issued through the direct banking system, the whole process is under financial supervision, therefore no platform is found to be an illegal business crime.If this case is convicted, then the country's more than 10,000 Spiritual utility platforms exist "no payment license is likely to be found to be illegal business" situation, should be criminal case, should be considered an illegal business crime.

Even more worrying is that the judicial organs have not previously identified such platform business as an illegal business crime, and there are people from the legal community who say this case is "the first case in the country of the illegal business crime prosecution of the business platform case."

and 04

Slow progress in verification after reporting 27 similar platforms to the court

According to the family of the parties, in January 2026, Zhang Zhang to the Dandan district court that three companies operating the same type of business and the same business model were suspected of illegal operation.

On March 17, Zhang Super commissioned his first-instance lawyer, Liu Sheng, director of the Beijing Huizhou law firm, to submit more detailed reporting materials to the Dandy district court, and attached related evidence materials such as the communication records of the employees of the company and the company's situation.

On April 8, another party in the case also mailed the reporting material to the Danzig district court, reporting 24 similar companies suspected of illegal operation.

The family of the parties believes that the business type, business model and the activity of the enterprises are completely consistent, and according to the accusation criteria of the Danish District Prosecutor's Office, the enterprises are suspected of illegal business crimes.

“In accordance with the principle of the same case, whether the indictment of the accused is true, not only is it related to the punishment of the two people, but also to whether the two people constitute a crime.”On June 10, the family of the parties openly addressed to the judge of the district court Li Pingbo, requesting that the indictment of the two people be verified first, and carefully study the applications submitted by the defense lawyer, do not force the trial to advance.

Danish district court. 张梦云

According to the family of the parties, the various applications submitted by the defence lawyer to the court include: obtaining synchronous audio recording of interrogation, obtaining the underwriting of the audit report, obtaining the case material transferred to the Jinan City Public Security Bureau, obtaining the procedure for cooperation in the case, the signature on the detained document for authentication, notifying people with specialized knowledge to appear in the court, applying for advanced jurisdiction, etc., the most important is to verify the clues of Zhang Super and others.

"Zhang Super and others' reporting content has not yet been cleared, which is directly related to the conviction of the two people."The family of the parties said that the defense lawyer communicated with the case contractor officer several times, requesting the Danzhen district court to verify the clues of the two people's report in accordance with the law, and the final result came out to arrange a trial. but each time they were generally informed that they had been transferred to the public security organs, and then there was no further.

It is understood that the case was originally scheduled for the first trial on June 16, after the court notified the defense lawyer, in order to safeguard the defendant's lawsuit rights, it is necessary to investigate and verify the clues of Zhang Super and others' reports, and to further study the various applications submitted by the defense lawyer, so the trial is postponed, the time is pending.

According to the family of the parties, as of August 2026, some clues have not yet been transferred to the public security organs with jurisdiction over the location of the reporting unit for the handling of the reporting clues submitted by Zhang Super and others to the district court, and some clues have not yet been answered by the public security organs.

In this regard, the family of the parties, after consulting a lawyer, believes that in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the Supreme Law "On the handling of certain specific issues and the opinions of the court, the defendant provided to the court during the trial to reveal the content of the other person's crimes specific and clear clues, if it belongs to the jurisdiction of the public security organs, the case should be transferred directly by the court to the public security organs that have jurisdiction over the reporting person or the location of the reporting unit. in this case, the Danish District Court should directly transfer the reporting materials submitted by Zhang Superman and others to the public security organs where the reporting unit is located to deal with, but the Danish District Court needs the first line to transfer the material to

The family of the parties also said that in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the court has the right to collect and obtain evidence from relevant units and individuals.The public security organs of the place where the reporting unit is located on the process and the outcome of the handling of the transfer of traces of crime, belong to the evidence of direct relationship with the conviction of Zhang Super and others, and begged the Danish District Court to obtain it directly from the public security organs of the place where the reporting unit is located, in order to ensure the normal conduct of the trial and fairness.

and 05

* State concern for the development of the industrial industry*

The significance of the illegal business case has gone beyond the case itself, becoming the "Damoklis sword" hanging on the heads of 3,2 million flexible employers.

According to a recent study released by the “China New Form of Employment Research Center” jointly initiated by the Capital Economic and Trade University and China Employment Promotion Association, the number of flexible employment in China is expected to reach 3.2 million people this year.

Official information shows that Yang Heo, chairman of the "cloud account" enterprise in the industry, not only received supreme law and supreme inspection subjects, but also received the central leadership research on several occasions, and Yang Heo himself was hired by the Justice Ministry's first "special invitation administrative law enforcement supervisors" on December 26, 2025.

The public information shows that Yang Huang, chairman of the "cloud account" enterprise headed by the industrial industry, not only received supreme law and supreme inspection subjects, but also received the central leadership research on several occasions, and Yang Huang himself was hired by the Ministry of Justice on December 26, 2025 for the first "special invitation of administrative law enforcement supervisors".

Cloud accounts are supported by the "two high" topics.

“This is in sharp contrast to the allegations of illegal business crimes: the same business model, in some places encouraged by policies, and in other places enclosed with criminal locks.”The family of the parties pointed out that flexible employment is a form of employment explicitly encouraged by the state, and many governments have adopted policies to support its development. If the company is recognized as illegal, then more than 10,000 similar platforms across the country will face criminal risks, and the entire industry could fall into panic.

“The deeper impact is that this will directly impact the income settlement channels of 3,2 million flexible employers, posing a threat to employment stability.”

by *