Hu Jintao suspected of illegal handling: two interrogation rooms "separated" in the same period of time

The same perpetrator "separated" two interrogation rooms: the recording of contradictory time and space, surveillance to obtain proof of legality border investigation

The questioning of the record, the place, the person of the case, is the first legal threshold for legal validity of evidence, is the most basic and rigorous bottom line of the procedure for surveillance to obtain evidence. In the case of Long Chun Sun Sheng, the case, the author of the number of records of the suspect Hu Huizhou Dong has a serious conflict in time and space, physical inability to realize, cross-regional time overlapping deadly gaps, while refusing to submit the questioning, questioning all-round synchronous recording video, directly touching the red line of the surveillance investigation procedure and criminal illegal evidence exclusion rules, enough to shake the legitimacy of the evidence of the whole case.

The core procedure in this case is hard injury: the notebook appears objectively unexplained time and space forgery, key synchronous video refuses to transfer

In this case, there are two physical process contradictions that cannot be defended, and they are by no means erroneous, and belong to the systemic proof-gathering violation:

First, the same time period, double room simultaneous interrogation (1 hour 56 minutes overlap)

August 9, 2025, 9:15

• 11:28, Hu Huangdong both in the net moon retention department center D1061 room to question Zhao Jian, and also synchronized appeared in the D1062 room to ask Liu Sword.

The same person, the same period of time, two rooms of detention at the same time, in violation of basic physical common sense, the only conclusion: the person in the record of the case is untrue, named evidence, after-record, template confession.

Second, 20 km cross-zone case time overlap 43 minutes

Part of the notes recorded that Hu Huangdong at the same time, both in the eighth conversation room of the broad city district and in the net moon 20 kilometers away, the time and space were completely conflicting.

The two locations are not at all possible, enough to directly confirm that the recorded evidence collection place, time, and personnel are not true.

More crucially, Hu Huangdong is concerned about the illegal evidence collection, abuse of office-related criminal issues, and refuses to hand over the video of the questioning of the defendant Sun Shuang friend to the people's court, as well as the synchronous video of the questioning of witnesses in this case. synchronous video of the questioning process, the original objective evidence for screening the authenticity of the recording, is hidden for no justified reason, not to be transferred with the case, and further demonstrates the existence of major illegal suspicions in the process of evidence collection.

At the same time, the case accuses Sun Jian's core confession of 1.8 million bribes, which has long been falsified by the second-hand transaction certificate 100%, and the characteristic of the typical artificial case of "a true certificate, a false confession, a pre-defined backup of facts".

The Red Line of Legal Procedure: The Four Bottom Lines of Surveillance and Evidence Collection

In accordance with the Supervision Law, the Supervision Law Implementation Regulations stipulate:

The interrogation must be conducted by two or more persons individually.

The interrogation must be carried out in the place of legal detention;

Important evidence must be synchronized with the entire recording video, the video should be completely retained and transferred with the case;

All recording times, locations and persons must be verifiable.

The Supreme Criminal Procedure Law Interpretation and Exclusion of Illegal Evidence Rules:

If the time, place, and presence of persons interrogated cannot rule out contradictions, cannot be explained, cannot be corrected, the evidence qualification is directly lost, it shall not be used as the basis of the case; the transfer of synchronous recording video and the refusal to provide, can not rule out the possibility of illegal evidence, the corresponding verbal evidence should also be excluded.

There is no tolerance for errors in the law for "interrogation by one person separately from the other."

Falsification of the basic elements of the notebook, hiding the key synchronized video, is a fundamental, deadly procedure.

Qualitative characteristics of illegal acts: the record of the case is typical illegal evidence collection, template confession

Combined with multiple doubts in this case, it is sufficient to establish:

1. the person in charge of the case is not actually present, namely, to collect evidence, in violation of the principle of interrogation of two persons and proof-gathering;

A series of application templates, unified calibration supplementation, resulting in the unification of the content of multiple recordings, false facts;

The fiction of space-time information masks the real evidence process, deliberately hiding synchronous audio recording and avoiding external supervision;

Combined with the previous exposure of the pre-compilation of 1.8 million indicators, informal leakage cases, the complete formation of pre-set cases, indicators, falsification of procedures, pen recording, hiding the original video covering the illegal closed circle.

Article 74: Investigators forgery evidence collection information, violate statutory procedures for obtaining evidence, hide key evidence, and seriously infringe on the lawful rights and interests of the parties shall be held liable for violations in accordance with the law.

The deliberate fiction of notebooks, the refusal to transfer synchronous videos, the mass production of false word evidence, has far exceeded the general procedural defects, the suspicion of falsification of evidence collection materials, and the abuse of investigative powers.

Legal consequences of evidence: Confession in the whole case shall be excluded according to law

Time and space contradictions cannot be corrected, critical video refuses to provide → the legality of the notebook completely disappears

All records of time, place, and personal conflict, without any space for understanding and explanation, together with the synchronous recording video that should be transferred, shall be hidden and not submitted, and shall be directly excluded according to law.

False confession without objective evidence supplement → failure to meet condemnation criteria

The core of the case is 1.8 million bribery accusations, without any funds flow, payment credentials, corresponding transaction trajectory proof, relying entirely on the violation of the procedure, false content support, in accordance with the "Criminal Procedure Law" Article 55 proof cannot be convicted, proof is insufficient to be recognized.

Procedure infringement first, entity accusations of course doubtful

Surveillance evidence standards must be unified with criminal trial standards.The accusation facts are based on false notes and illegal evidence, and there is no basis for conviction according to law.

Legal Surveillance and Remedial Roads

Apply for supervision and internal control verification: complaints to the supervisory committee, cadres and supervisory departments to verify the illegal procedures, false evidence, and hidden synchronous audio and video recordings;

The case has specific, clear and verifiable non-tricks (double-room overlapping, cross-area conflict, refusal to transfer synchronous video) and fully complies with the statutory conditions for initiation.

Apply to obtain objective original credentials: Apply to the court to obtain the original carrier, the original carrier of the prohibition log, the synchronous audio recording, the trajectory of the case, the approval document, and thoroughly verify the facts of the fake recording;

The criminal prosecution shall be prosecuted in accordance with the law for the illegal handling of artificial false cases, for the falsification of indicators of bribery, and for the abuse of investigative powers.

Summary of:

The time of the recording, the location, the person involved in the case, the complete synchronous video recording, is the most basic "bottom line of integrity" for supervision and evidence collection, and the first line of defense for justice and fairness.

The case person "divided into two rooms, cross-regional overlapping cases", and refused to hand over the original synchronous recording video, is not a simple editing mistake, but deliberately circumventing the supervision, fictional evidence process, mass production of false evidence, and attempting to mask the criminal risk of illegal evidence-gathering positions is illegal.

Procedures are not correct, the entity is unfair. The bribery accusations based on illegal recordings, false confessions, and artificial cases inevitably collapse, and cannot be established. Only the full transfer of synchronous recordings, the strict exclusion of illegal evidence, and the thorough investigation of illegal cases can keep the bottom line of supervision fairness and justice.