On what basis did the company that was established nine days before the start of work succeed to the $120 million agricultural project?

Hebei's construction team has received this.The most attractive figure for contracting information on the Inner Mongolia General-Liquity Agricultural Park was $408 per square metre.Construction staff who were interviewed by the Financial Survey.It was recalled that the cost of materials and construction for the normal shed works was much lower than the offer, while the project party had designated a procurement channel and required the construction team to advance the money. The team was waiting to see the site with the project department, the supervisory department and the construction department, and many thought that they had found a large, well-processed project.

23 March 2025The opening ceremony was held at the Smart and Efficient Agricultural Estate of Moneystore, Koljan District. The total investment in external planning was $120 million, representing 760 acres, with an estimated annual profit of $30 million, and an additional 300 villagers to be brought to work. The registration date for MKKKKKKKK is 14 March

• only nine days from the start of the construction ceremony, with a registered funding of 5.5 million yuan. The short time of incorporation of the company would certainly constitute an offence, but the construction of the funds, the capacity to perform and the qualifications for contracting should have been tested before the project was signed.

By the end of September 2026, all that Zohang saw in the park was three steel-mounted sheds, two hot sheds, a broken membrane and no construction staff on the site. Local villagers said that few people continued to work after the ceremony and that the promised employment opportunities had not been realized.The total planned investment is $120 million.It cannot be written as a financial contribution that has been disbursed, let alone as a direct presumption that a person has misappropriation of all 120 million yuan. The real loss of real property was incurred by the construction enterprises that purchased materials and paid for labour in the belief that the work could be settled.

On 12 October, the Koljun District Government respondedIt was alleged that the main persons involved in the contract fraud in Yuanfung Agriculture had been detained in early April and the case had been referred to the prosecution for prosecution. A contrasting time lag has emerged: the law enforcement authorities have initiated criminal proceedings this spring, and it was not until October that the public widely saw the still abandoned agricultural parks. Criminal investigations can hold individuals personally responsible for alleged fraud, but what happens to villagers ' land, how much workers ' advance payments can be recovered, and how project-building qualifications will be obtained, remains a public consequence that needs to be addressed separately.

The issue was still pending the signing of the contract. The documentation, local start-up campaigns, construction registration, construction subcontracts and procurement of designated materials are in the hands of different subjects. A newly registered enterprise can quickly stand on the start-up of a multimillion dollar project, which does not mean that the Government guarantees all its business commitments, but the Government, with its own resources of advocacy, gives the project public credit and cannot announce “legally” after the business has lost connection without explaining how the project enters into public information and land use processes.

The Koljun District indicated that it would carry out the inventory of the assets involved and conduct a search of other agricultural projects. The fulfilment of this commitment depends on the outcome of the construction team ' s work on the enforceable claims, the resumption of production of land and the disclosure of the subject of responsibility in project approval and promotional materials. The results of the work have been described in five damaged huts; The following judicial documents and financial records will explain the institutional gaps used by the fraud.