Don't follow the case of YOON Jiangen!

• Weight of text: the case of Yoon Jiangen, torture of public opinion monitoring and speech borders

Introduction

Don't want you to be an angel, but don't do anything evil!

When an online post is written on behalf of the people, in exchange for cross-provincial arrests, criminal prosecutions, where is the line of the media rhetoric?

On 10 September 2026, at 9 a.m., the case of the social mediaman Yoon Jiangen (named pen-cropping, public: sun under pen-pain, spring-light) who was of high interest to the public hearing was heard in the Intermediate People ' s Court of the City of Anhu Ma ' ayama and the District People ' s Court.

At the hearing, the defence lawyer Zhang Zhang Zhenggen gave a full defence of his innocence, arguing that the actions of Yoon Jiangen were legitimate public opinion and did not constitute a criminal offence.

At the end of the trial, the presiding judge declared the case to be a very complex one and delivered a judgement at a later stage.

The outcome of the case will have a profound impact on the media industry throughout the country, and will have a profound impact on the hearts of countless ordinary writers.

All sectors of society are looking forward to a just verdict that will stand the test of history and be conducive to the development of a sound society.

Text

01

Who's the perpetrator of this treachery?

The story begins with Anhui and a farmer woman named Chan Deok-jin.

This man, who was in arrears, was a red brick sum — $100,000 in the district.

She's been after this for over 20 years.

More than 20 years of light and light are enough to make a baby a man and enough to make a silk hair white.

But Chen Deok-jin's brick money was always like a stone on his chest, and he was sunk in a deep, puffy breath.

In 2021, things seemed to have finally dawned.

Chen De Jin and the Luyang town government signed an agreement for compensation, which promised to pay $100,000 in the final payment on schedule.

But the agreement was signed, the letter was dropped, and the town government defaulted after the expiry of the contract — the money, or the money.

Chen De Jin has no choice but to visit the city.

And? He was taken back to be sentenced to one year for the crime of plagiarizing.

After her release from prison, she said on Twitter that the town party secretary Liu Xuan "calls the police and is held in administrative detention for another 18 days.

That makes it necessary to ask: who is in "settling"? Who is creating contradictions and provoking passions?

On 11 August 2025, the media could not watch from YOON Jiangen.

He took the pen and sent a voice for Chen Dejan on the public sign, "and the county secretary of Luyang Town Party Liu, who intended to cause the government to "rebel of trust" "breach."

This voice, like a stone, was thrown into a calm lake, and the croaks were turned around and finally a giant wave was launched.

After the article was published, local staff contacted Yoon Jiangen to request a strike. YOON Jiangen refused.

He probably did not think that a mediaman from Hunanjio, 700 kilometres away, would be taken across the province by Anhui and the county police — criminal detention, charged with the offence of sedition.

At the first instance, and in the county court, the Court found that 75 articles on human rights in Yoon Jiangen contained "inaccuracies", involving 16 facts in various provinces and municipalities throughout the country, and sentenced him to two years and three months' imprisonment.

Okay, here's the problem.

First, did Chan Deok-jin's $100,000 brick money go through?

Secondly, if the legitimate demands of the crowd are not resolved, then what's the name of the article? "No problem solved, no problem solved"?

Third, a town party secretary, how can the police catch people over 700 kilometres across the province? This energy, isn't it a little big? Who is behind this?

So, the real "the perpetrator" of the crime, is it the article that spoke for the people, or the brick money that's been outstanding for over 20 years? Is it a pen in the author's hand or is it the overreaction of some people?

02

The millennium law of the county should not be broken today.

And the districts, ancient Nunyang, are a city of cultural fame with a history of over 2,000 years.

The Chinese Olympic gold-earner, Hsu Hae-Feng, and the eight-month retired teacher, Ye Lamping, were awarded a "good Chinese" for their 20-year free education for the children left behind.

But what is most unforgettable about the counties is its millennia-long rule of law.

Tang Dynasty celebrated four years, Shi Ho Liu Zhi was demeaning and had a history of state stinging. In the face of the severe drought, the local gentleman offered to build a mansion to please him. Liu Zhi categorically rejected it and stated, "No man shall flourish when his people are in need."

He chose to dwell in a remote place on the outskirts of the city, and wrote a thousand old words, the Scrolls. "The mountains are not high, and there are names of the fair; The water is not deep, there are dragons -- not only the mortals, but the "fun" of the people.

In the fifth year, the 29-year-old Pao was brought to the rank of the First and State Prisoner.

He has taken up his post with a pro-nuclear tax book, a strict punishment for the concealment of money, the creation of a well-known and notorious scheme to strip the merchants of their agents, the disclosure of tax rules, the elimination of the need for private participation, the granting of a peace deal to small-scale traders and the rigorous scrutiny of tax-smuggling and collusion with officials.

Liu's clean and clean house, his law enforcement and his law enforcement service throughout the town floor together form a legal vein that extends over a thousand years.

But now?

Liu Xinxi said "the way of man is in law" and considered the law a public instrument, not a private one.

Today, however, people were arrested across the province for criticizing a commune party secretary.

The police are punishing the agents of the "Bitch-Book-Blank" with the state.

Today, however, a peasant woman was arrested for having been behind for more than 20 years in the bricks, and for having been arrested for having written her articles.

The millennium curator, heavy as a stale. Let's not let the millennia's reputation be destroyed by a hundred thousand bricks and a piece of the word.

The State and the county are creating a legal and business environment in which they can seek financial and intellectual resources.

But if a local image of the rule of law is focused on the national public in a case of "cross-provincial capture", then what is lost is a freedom for Yoon Jiangen?

03

Core court disputes: how to draw a line between criticism of oversight and insult and slander

In the second trial, five core defence arguments were presented by Defence Counsel Zhang Zhang Zheng, who was killed in the blood.

In the second trial, the defence counsel Zhang Zhang Zheng Zheng Zheng Zheng put forward five core defence arguments, which were bloodied with knives

First, sharp criticism does not amount to physical assault.

The first instance equates the sharp criticism of citizens for the performance of their duties by public officials directly with verbal abuse.

The oversight of public officials can be strong, but does not amount to physical assault, which is the proper purpose of public opinion oversight.

Secondly, civil and criminal proceedings are not available.

The public officials who were criticized did not bring civil action for honour rights, nor did they file criminal criminal charges for defamation, nor did the MCSR find the contents of the articles to be false information, and the court directly found "insulting" in criminal proceedings, which were questionable.

Thirdly, there is no falsification of information.

All the articles published by Yoon Jiangen are based on the letter-and-visit material provided by the parties and are not fabricated in a false way and cannot be simply identified as fabricated.

Fourth, the evidence is not balanced.

The high number of statements and testimonies of the criticized party in the first instance was not sufficiently accessible and verified by the party defending the rights.

"Prove" the critics' articles with their own testimony -- the logic, the taste, the finest.

Fifth, self-censorship in the media is not tantamount to a struggle.

The article by Yoon Jiangen is intended to help ordinary people reflect their demands, not to cause wanton debauchery and disturb the social order, and does not correspond to the criminal composition of the crime of sedition.

Counselor Zhang Zhang Qianjin stated: "We do not deny that criticism can be stabbing, but stabbing supervision does not amount to a crime. "..

In his community of friends, counsel said: “A voice for the weak is a noble moral and a commendable act of support.

If an article is found guilty, it is the world that is going to learn and learn.

If an article is guilty of assault without making up a fact, it is only a false compliment.

If public officials do not tolerate sharp criticism, a situation of self-fulfilment can arise.

If the executive branch deals with social criticism of public opinion, it is seen as causing a serious breakdown of social order, it will become the body of formalism. The blogger adds:

Article 35 of the Constitution of the People ' s Republic of China clearly states: " Citizens of the People ' s Republic of China have the freedom of speech, publication, assembly, association, procession and demonstration. "..

Article 41 states: "A citizen has the right to criticize and advise any State organ and its agents. "..

The citizens ' right to oversight is granted by the Constitution.

But now, the sound of surveillance is coming with the criminal means.

Is this a case under the law or is it a crime?

04

History slaps: What happened to the officials who hit the monitors?

History will not repeat itself, but its logic is often astoundingly similar.

The former Secretary of the Gansu Muwe City Council was very proud and was arrested during the regime, which provoked public opinion and was subsequently sentenced to 18 years ' imprisonment for bribery, embezzlement of public funds and abuse of authority.

Earlier, Shandong Go-Tang posted "The Internet" was a sensational event in the country.

The local county secretary Sun Lan Rain, has used public power to arrest ordinary people simply because the Internet is posting a bar and publishing criticism.

And? The Secretary subsequently committed his own violations, which became a negative educational material for the rule of law.

The people are as watery as water, and the people are not too good. And the power over man is over him.

Shanxi journalists were working hard and were imprisoned for retaliation for their exposure to local fraud projects.

After eight years of imprisonment, the case has not yet been re-examined.

When will the damage caused by those years of prison be eliminated?

There is also Liu Tei-man, former Deputy Director of the National Commission for Development and Reform and former Director of the National Energy Agency.

The Department of Energy responded that day to "spokenly slander" when a prominent mediaman, Roxamping, reported on his blog, in his name, such issues as the falsification of his education.

Less than six months later, Liu Teen Man was declared under investigation and eventually lost his job.

The milestone of cyber-corruption is precisely the example of real oversight, not fear of sharpness; Fearing sharp, often impure.

These cases repeatedly warn that public power should have a critical heart.

Criticism can be wrong, and can be defended through civil and administrative means, but the easy use of criminal means against monitors can seriously undermine the credibility of local governments and undermine the rule of law environment.

The Internet is not an extrajudicial place — it is for the Internet. But there is the latter sentence: public power cannot be abused — it is for some.

What would happen if, as soon as the voices of criticism appeared, criminal means were used to suppress them?

The effect of the chilling effect is "unspeakable" by ordinary people, and the defenders are in a state of shock, ultimately undermining the rule of law in society as a whole.

Don't call me a bad name for the good of the officer!

The Secretary of the Liu, the leaders of the city and county of the saddle mountain, history is a mirror.

How many of those officers who are so aggressive and aggressive in their own way have got a chance? Don't play a good hand.

05

The plight of the media: who speaks for the weak?

Yoon Jiangen, born 1965, Hunanjian.

The long-term operation of the media accounts, which are intended to help the general public to reflect their demands and to defend their rights, has resulted in the publication of hundreds of rights-based articles.

His experience is a microcosm of the fate of many private mediamen.

The author has worked for over a decade in the public media and has never been subjected to public pressure by the Public Prosecutor ' s Law.

The media are now increasingly vocal, and this year has turned to media. It's hard to write in less than six months!

The previous bullying of the school by vulnerable girls who were single-parent families in the Shuyang Mawang High School, received a telephone warning from the mayor of the town!

The Sichuanbachic System has been singled out for "the headlines of today", "the red book", "the 100" and other self-media posts.

The public account, Quiets, was also blocked for six months in connection with the incident of the flight attendant in Nanjing, and was disturbed by four policemen who came to the house late at night and were disturbed by the incident.

"You don't speak, I don't speak, who speaks? "..

Ordinary people suffer injustice and often have no recourse but to rely on online public opinion.

The fact that they act as a bridge between the media and bringing the plight of ordinary people to the public is in itself a complementary force of social oversight.

Of course, there are boundaries to public opinion monitoring: facts cannot be fabricated, physical attacks cannot be made.

But the scale of criticism should be clear judicial, and "scrutinizing" cannot be equated with a criminal offence.

In the trial, Yoon Jiangen, a 60-year-old "cultural farmer", was held in penthouse in exchange for inter-provincial arrests and more than two years of prison.

He wrote not a terrible case, but a bitterness of the 100,000 bricks demanded by the peasant woman.

But he was sentenced to death for "small money". Chan Deok-jin's brick money is still in the air.

The most terrible corruption is the impunity of the people.

06

Don't let this be a stingy turn the county into a law and order business.

The case of Yoon Jiangen is no longer just a common criminal case.

It concerns the boundaries of freedom of expression for citizens, the measure of public opinion oversight, how public officials treat criticism, and the relationship between public power and the media.

If the case were to be decided, the direct imposition of a sharp criticism and supervision would send a dangerous signal to the media industry throughout the country that the author of the speech on behalf of the people could face prison conditions at any time.

Conversely, if the courts clarified the boundaries between criticism and crime and kept the lines of citizen oversight, they would convey confidence in the rule of law to society as a whole.

Networked media has pushed the case to the attention of the public throughout the country, and the local political and judicial authorities and superior authorities in Anhui should give it high priority and take the case to a careful trial.

The verdict will also be of great interest to the high-level public!

We expect the court of second instance to clarify the legal boundaries and to make a fair judgement that will stand the test of history and be beneficial to the development of good society.

But more important than the verdict is whether or not the local scene is at the origin of the incident

But more important than the verdict is whether or not the local scene is at the origin of the incident.

When will Chan Deok-jin's $100,000 brick money be settled?

The government of Luyang is in breach of trust.

How can a town secretary, who is a town secretary, use criminal means against a mediaman 700 kilometres away?

If these problems are not resolved, and if YOON Jiangen is locked in jail, the mood will not be over.

Instead, it becomes a scar on the state-run business environment — investors will see, entrepreneurs will see, and the people of the country will see.

Solving the problem is far more important than suppressing the sound.

Secretary Liu and the leaders of the county, do not let this be a scorn for yourselves.

Don't let the words come back to life! The millennium-long legal arteries of the districts, and the good-faith business of the counties, cannot afford such a diversion.

History's slaps tend to sound very clear.

I wrote two reviews on the Jiangen case before, and soon disappeared! I hope this article will survive the night.

Don't cross the line, please. (Van/Jing)

This paper is based on an objective review of public court information, online public reporting and does not represent a final judicial conclusion, which ultimately leads to a court-acting judgement.

We welcome the attention, the praises, the forwards and the lead, and we would like to offer you more unique and wonderful political and business stories. The "Joseph" is limited for another six months for reasons known to the people! We're not gonna get involved. Welcome to the new "The Static"

Attention to the livelihood of the people and to the rule of law. Different news, different public!

By: Brother Jing

We believe in the public: The case of the Silence.

The source's Quiet case.

ID: SSJJGC

Quoted: Fiego

The revision is a tumbler.

The Psychics say that

Retrospect of previous periods

Review of previous periods

The "Tang Monk" on the edge of Kamenjiang? Who is the “payer” for the “failure” of a letter of reply to the fall-after-fall, which brings the river back to the bottom and imposes a huge fine?

How dare you sue the public! The Central City Authority has 255,582,000 large fines: who is making the lie when the housing company calls the wrongs?

"The rich woman I have to her finger" Sun Yuo-mong is not Tong Pak Fu, and Chou-hyang is not Chou-hyang! Don't worry, it's just a rag trade in red-collar currency.

The sham-showing "Showing the Street" of the undergrad teacher, with the loud slaps of the pro-education test!

Kneeled? The law prohibits "civil servant" from issuing a statement: such a gesture is a shame on the legal profession.

A million years of draught or punishment for draughts, and a man's food security depends on luck? Is it illegal to produce “soul food” that is fermented and moldy?

Send it to the attic to find out what a huge amount of cash it is! Governor Jiangxi Ye Jian Chun was investigated and was the “first-in-first” provincial government of the youngest province in the country

The bullet continues to fly: 14 hands-on “deactivated” were redeployed! Which officials were removed from the Chungking Square, which was the scene of the earthquake?

The Zhi Feng Moon under the wine cup: the jailed deputy governor and the new-timed beauty-spring teacher

Jiang Soolung Yung's case: The law should not have been the rule of law, but the law should have been the first to see the whistleblowers.

Top-level hunting: Is the belt a life sentence for the night? The troupe has a hundred billion dollars of financial corruption.

The Zhi Feng Moon under the wine cup: the jailed deputy governor and the new-timed beauty-spring teacher