Counsel for Zhu Li Jun applied for State compensation: challenged the way the police were held in detention on 3 days across the border

On 13 July 2025, Zhu Li Jun received administrative judgement No. 220, final sentence of Changzhou Central Court (2025), upholding decision No. 4170 of the Public Security Substation of Wudong: he was held for three days for having publicly murdered one of his friends, the name of Zhang ' s decision not to punish, his identity card number, his residence, and was found guilty of violating privacy.

Although not in agreement with the “privilege” determination, Zhu Li Jun, as a practising lawyer, chose to perform the effective decision before going to the remedial procedure of trial, prosecution supervision and so on.

On 13 and 14 July, he contacted Vice-President Ji-lone, who was in the village of Bull Pond, twice in a letter: “I would like to cooperate, when will it be implemented? I've arranged for a court hearing. The other party replied “in swimming” “in meeting”, but did not inform the time.

At 6 a.m. on 15 July 2025, nearly 100 police personnel were placed in the eastern garden of the Golden Garden, and were taken out by surprise by undercover, special police and civilian police officers on multiple levels of surveillance, who were working with the law enforcement lawyers. The court sittings were held at 1400 hours and the arbitration session on 21st, and were held in vain.

During the removal, the person concerned was subjected to a neck-pressed movement, with the full cooperation of the person concerned and the presence of the neighbour.

Zhu Li Jun argued that the original punishment entity's conclusion could be stayed, but that the method of execution was independent and independently compensable — detention for three days, no risk of flight, willingness to cooperate, but with almost 100 police forces to issue early morning charges, not to inform, and to show publicization of forced displacement, in violation of the principle of proportionality, due process and protection of human dignity.

. Application for State compensation (in draft form)

Application for State compensation

Claimant: Zhu Li Jun, male, born on 17 December 1966, Han ethnic, practising lawyer

Location: Golden Orient Garden, Bull Tong, Wujin City, Jiangsu Province

Resident ID number: *

Address: 9 Golden Orient Gardens, Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province*

Resident ID number:*

Contact number: 138 x x x x x x x x

The Public Security Bureau of Changzhou City, Wujin Subdirectorate

Place of residence: 18 An Road, Lake Tong, Wu-Jing District, Changzhou City

Legal Representative: Director General

Claims for compensation

1. Requesting the legal confirmation of the violation of the procedure followed by dozens to nearly 100 police officers in the execution of the decision on administrative penalties of the Wudu (Cow) (2024) No. 4170 at around 6 a.m. on 15 July 2025, in the vicinity of the home of the claimant, by means of a charge, a raid, a reasonable notice of the time of execution, and failure to reflect the principle of the necessary proportionality;

(b) Request an apology for the damages sought to the extent of the violation (including the members ' group of the Golden Orient Centre, the relevant scope of the bar and the record of law enforcement within the public security system);

1. Request payment of 1 yuan for moral damage;

1. Request that the relevant persons responsible for the enforcement of the law (such as Ji-lone, the Caucande police station) be referred to the Inspectorate for investigation and investigation in accordance with the law.

Facts and reasons

. Grounds of case

The claimant is the subject of Administrative Case No. 220, concluded with Su04 (2025). The case upheld decision 4170 (3 days of detention) of the Public Security Subdirectorate of Wudang.

On 13 July and 14 July 2025, the claimant contacted Deputy Director Ji-long of the Pond Police Station twice, via Wen Suk, to make clear “that he is willing to cooperate in the execution, to ask when”, and that the bag “meetings” were not answered positively and the time for execution was not communicated.

. The facts as to the violation of the right to life in the course of the enforcement process

On 15 July 2025, at about 0600 hours, the Compensation Service launched a large-scale operation involving dozens of up to 100 police officers (including civilian police officers in civilian clothes, special police officers, civilian police officers in civilian uniform) in the area of the Golden Orient Garden, 99 South Lake Lake, Wugang, in the city of Changzhou, where the Claimant was resident:

(b) 9 units of units A and B with multiple cordons outside the lobby;

(b) The numeric police levels inside and outside the hall;

Ten external intersections were manned by police;

The Zanan-King East Care Centre has created a large number of geriatrics.

When he brought the claimant from room 201 of 9 units A and A, to the main hall of the unit, he faced dozens of neighbours with complete cooperation and no resistance, and forced him to press his neck.

The execution was not appropriate as indicated below.

The execution was not appropriate as

Violation of the principle of proportionality

The administrative detention of only three days, with the clear willingness to cooperate and without risk of flight, was controlled with almost 100 police, clearly exceeding the necessary law enforcement strength.

Abuse of process

The person concerned has taken the initiative to ask the time of execution, and the person who is handling the case has deliberately failed to inform him that the execution was carried out in the morning in a surprise, thereby presenting the execution as “publicizing and humiliating”.

Rights violations of the personality

The mass police presence and the proliferation of the perimeters in residential areas have led to widespread awareness among neighbours, members of the foster centres and lawyers, and a decrease in public evaluation, which has violated privacy, honour and human dignity.

Physical and mental health and professional impairment

(b) The sudden removal of the cord caused psychological stress; The scheduled 15 July court session and the 21 July arbitration session were frustrated, undermining the practice arrangements and the parties ' trust.

III. Legal basis

According to articles 3, 33 and 35 of the State Compensation Law of the People ' s Republic of China, and article 15 of the Supreme People ' s Court ' s Regulations on Certain Issues in the Consideration of Administrative Compensation Cases:

(b) Liability for violations of the law and violations of the rights of the person and of the dignity of the human person committed by the executive branch;

(b) The effects, rehabilitation and apology of moral damage and its consequences shall be eliminated; (b) Payment of moral damages in cases of serious consequences;

The claim for compensation was filed within two years of the date on which the violation was known to the claimant and was not time-barred.

The original penalty decision was not contested by the entity, but the manner of execution was independent and independent and compensable.

In this regard, the duty to make reparation is urged to be brought before the courts, to establish that the law is not in force and to make appropriate reparation and redress.

Here you go.

Changzhou City Public Security Bureau, Wujin Substation

Attach:

(2025) Copy of Administrative Judgement No. 220, Final of Su04

Copy of Decision on Administrative Penalties No. 4170

We have a report on the communications of 13 and 14 July 2025.

Execution of live video/photo/witness testimony trail

Claimant: Zhu Li Jun (signed with handprint)

26 October 2026