I would not have had any quarrels with anyone, nor would I have been against you. If Li Woo-sun was to continue to involve me, I would have been there for the rest of my life.
Li Woo-sung, when we were defusing each other, I was just saying: I must respond positively if you name me Wang Gan-sun in your articles and videos.
Your short video, which is a hype of the Ai, and a micro-membracing, I can't watch it except for the first half of my life. You deliberately cast a sentence, vaguely saying, that you had no idea what Zhu Haiyan and I were related to.
Isn't that a pacing, a trap?
Former lawyer Wen Donghai has made it clear in the circle of friends that Al-Zhu Haiyan is a client with whom he has close ties.
Al-Zu Haiyan is just the core figure in my long-suspending, ongoing concern over the Shimun school dispute.
You deliberately cast the word “relationship” in a clear sense, deliberately blundering a pool of water and tying me with “intimate relationships” and deliberately creating public opinion.
And say that the so-called green land you call "green land" is a piece of crap that you can't speak on the Internet.
I have also approved the words you wrote before, and I can't believe you're willing to mix up with such people and drop your own band.
I remember when you came to me at 1 a.m. that day and said that Liu was spreading rumours among my 500 people that you had taken money from Al-Zu Haiyan and used it as a gunman.
Even if there was such a message, it was a long-time old message, not an instant feedback at the time of the incident.
I added hundreds of micro-clinics, which are usually a daily routine for emptying chat records, and I am only able to intercept and leave a few critical pieces of evidence.
Lee Woo-sung himself did not come to me in my group, and he did not “reciprocate” to me much later, and I was not responsible, able, and even less obliged to act as a “sinner light” to judge the rhetoric.
I asked Liu Hae-yan later, and she said she had not sent this information in my group, but had sent it in her own micro-clinic, claiming that someone had received money to wash the place of Zhu Haiyan, the leading cause of the Shimun school dispute.
And it was this that I and Li Woo-sung finally deleted the wiss.

Net sex

We have come to make a public statement: Li Woo-sung, a law firm in Beijing, was licensed to practice as a lawyer only in 2023 and transferred to the firm in February 2026.
I have searched the authoritative judicial platforms of the Chinese Judicial Documentation Network and the Great Fatal Po in North China and have not found any record of the case concluded by Agent Li Woo-sung, but your lawyer is in good faith.
And in your video, you're getting a lot of voice and personal conversations between you and Liu.
As a licensed lawyer, you can't have learned it from articles 1032 and 1033 of the Civil Code?
You are aware that the unauthorized disclosure of information about private conversations with others is per se suspected of being illegal and, above all, a serious breach of the lawyers ' duty to keep their confidentiality.
Whether you're talking to me or your own statement in the video, one thing is mentioned: you've charged Liu Yui's fees through other intermediaries and promised to write her a speech.
The name Liu Hao is a very hot topic on the video, but I have not seen an article today that calls for Liu Yu Sam's name, but only an AI short video that leaks personal information.
You're more aware of the legal risks of taking money from others, promising to write a written text, and not to see it.
Is this a charge to the firm's public account or is it a direct entry into your personal bank, Kari?
As a practising lawyer, who does not study the legal business, who instead goes into cyber strife, who moves through the case of a man who's been working on a case, who walks on the edge of a violation, you should have enough to drink a pot of that.
I have not submitted to the Beijing Pilgrimage Association any complaint against you to date.
Once I have formally submitted a complaint, I will be asked about the investigation by the supervisory authorities, and how to explain it, you have to know it.
Li Woo-sung, take it easy.
I would not have wished to be against anyone, nor would I have wished to be against you.
But if you're going to keep me involved, I'm going to be there.
(A video video is recorded on this file and released on a platform-wide basis on 27 October)

Scanning to get more good.
Original source
- Original author
- 王甘霖
- Source account / outlet
- 微信公众号“霖看法工作室”
- Originally published
- 2026-10-26 20:45
- Content treatment
- Republished
- Original article
- View original ↗
- Published by China Focus
- 会员发布
Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…