Two children from the Mao in Guangdong raised their cards to help: their father was forced to take them to medical care twice after he reported the abuse at school

Two children from Shigeo in Guangdong have recently been on the phone with a paper for help, and they are facing camera calls for social attention to the rights of children. One boy wrote “speak for children”, while another asked the Government to safeguard the rights and interests of children. Together with them, they have been publicly called upon, along with the grandmother of ancient Fong, who has long been running to complain to his family. Behind the three seemingly ordinary family photos was a school abuse dispute that lasted for several years and the experience of a father who was sent to a psychiatric hospital twice after reporting that the local public security organs had failed to perform their duties in accordance with the law.

The incident began in 2022 and involved the police station of the Shiumi City Public Security Bureau, the Third People ' s Hospital of Mauumi City, local schools and the education administration. (b) The allegations by the Von Lidden family that the father and the two children were subsequently injured by a drug delivery, and that the family repeatedly reported to the police without being formally admitted; After continuing reporting, von Litung himself was forcibly taken to medical care, and two children faced difficulties in transferring to school, harassment in school and denial of school admission.

According to statements made by the People ' s Watch, New Tang and the parties disclosed in the Great Age between August and September 2026, the compulsory medical referral dispute in von Lidwin has attracted attention in the overseas media. At the end of October and early November, families continued to seek public help through social platforms, again pushing to the public the difficulties of schooling that children encounter during the new semester.

The most noteworthy fact to follow is that the family repeatedly filed a complaint and filed a complaint with the public security authorities, and why the official law requested by them was never brought before the court, while the father lost his personal liberty in the process.

From the father's hospital to the two children's health abnormal

Von Lidun had a dispute with local medical institutions, dating back to January 2022.

According to his previous media interview, he was taken to the material dependency section of the Third People ' s Hospital in Mau Mumi City, where he was treated for smoking and alcohol cessation for approximately 40 days, after having had a drink and had a dispute with others.

von Lidun stated that, as he was about to be discharged from hospital, he was given a bowl of broth by a nurse who, after drinking, had severe dizziness, increased blood pressure and fainting symptoms. After leaving the hospital, he suspected that he had been drugged and then reported the incident to the Ishikoo Ling police station and went to the Public Security Bureau of Gaozhou to report the incident.

However, his report did not receive the results he expected.

Von Lidun stated that the public security organs considered the matter to be a medical dispute and requested that they file a complaint with the health department. He considers that the possibility of criminal offences is covered by his own reflection and that the public security organs should investigate the matter in accordance with the law, at least to make a formal decision on whether to open a case.

In 2023, the health of the two sons of von Lidwin was again at risk.

Previous public interviews revealed that the eldest son had been burned to 41 degrees Celsius and that medical examinations involved hypercardiological hyperactivity; The youngest children were also found to have heart abnormalities. Families suspect that children have been subjected to human-induced drug abuse at school, and request that they provide monitoring information and report it to the public security authorities.

Von Lidun stated that when he asked to see the school surveillance, the school informed him that the surveillance was not functioning and could not be accessed. The family subsequently reported to the police, but still has not been able to obtain the investigation and the procedure they requested.

It should be noted that medical examinations found abnormal health and do not directly prove that the poisoning was committed. Family suspicions of human-induced harm still need to be investigated in conjunction with medical records, poison detection, surveillance and witness testimony. This does not prevent families from providing leads to public security authorities in accordance with the law, nor does it exempt schools from explaining health problems that occur during the school year.

For a family, the child suffers from severe physical abnormalities, requiring first medical treatment and a clear explanation of the cause of the illness. If the family also provides specific information on the alleged criminal offence, the relevant authorities should act in accordance with their responsibilities. The question of whether parents can eventually prove their suspicions and whether they have the right to report a complaint and to have it reviewed in accordance with the law is two different issues.

When you report a public disorder, your father is taken to a psychiatric hospital

More than the school injury dispute, Von Lidun was forced to take care of her after her continued advocacy.

According to a public account by Feng Li Din, in January 2024 he was requested to go to the police station by Red Flag police officers on the basis of registration information. He was taken directly to the Third People ' s Hospital in Mau Ming City after he arrived.

Von Lidun stated that the police and the persons concerned had tried to obtain a mental disability certificate and a low-insurance scheme for him, but he had expressly refused to accept it and did not consider himself to be suffering from a mental illness that required compulsory hospitalization.

He was again taken away by Red Flag police in January

1. On this occasion, he claimed that the police had used handcuffs and had taken him to a psychiatric hospital.

In an interview with the New Tang in September 2026, Feng Lidong stated that he had been threatened again with hospital treatment on the grounds that he continued to report and reflect problems. He submits that the local public security authorities are preventing him from continuing to report the school and hospital through the use of mental health care.

Von Lidun further states that after his discharge, members of the community and the police came to the house regularly to ask him to take medication for the purpose of reviewing his condition and indicated that he could be taken to hospital again if he refused to cooperate.

There is an inescapable legal question: The public security organs have placed citizens in psychiatric hospitals on the basis of which facts and legal procedures are in place?

Article 27 of the Mental Health Act of China clearly states that the diagnosis of mental disorders shall be based on the state of mental health; Article 28 restricts the conditions in which a person suspected of having mental disorders is brought to medical care by public security organs; Article 30 establishes the principle of voluntary hospitalization for mental disorders and provides for legal conditions for involuntary hospitalization.

In other words, the public security authorities cannot assume that a person needs compulsory psychiatric treatment simply by making repeated reports, making permanent visits or by contesting the public administration.

If the two medical referrals described by Feng Lidun are true, the police station must face the question of the reason for the referral and the basis for the medical evaluation: What was the act that was sufficient to trigger the compulsory referral? Which qualified psychiatrist did the hospital have to diagnose? What are the medical assessments, informed information and procedures on which hospital treatment is based?

In particular, it is necessary to ascertain whether the police consider continuing reporting to be an act that needs to be dealt with through mental health care.

Public reports do not disclose complete and complete medical findings, hospital records and police referral documents. Von Lidun denied that he was suffering from mental illness requiring compulsory treatment, and the complete basis for police and hospital treatment had not been publicly stated.

However, even if full medical records have not been obtained, the gravity of the dispute cannot be avoided.

Article 78 of the Mental Health Act establishes legal liability for the deliberate placement of persons with non-mental disorders in a medical institution and for unlawful restrictions on their personal liberty.

The professional judgement of mental health care must be independent of the need for the security of the executive. If the act of reporting is used as a real reason for the compulsory medical treatment and the medical institutions cooperate in the implementation of restrictions without a legal basis, psychiatric treatment may be transformed into a tool for controlling citizens ' complaints.

# # The kids are transferred and they're being refused school on 1 September #

The learning and life of the two children also continued to be affected as fathers were repeatedly taken to medical care and families continued to report.

According to the latest public information on the family ' s recourse, the young children have been confronted with a number of teacher-related disputes during the kindergarten, and four kindergartens have been replaced. According to the family, some kindergartens refused to refund the school security fees and the children were subjected to verbal abuse and threats by teachers.

The eldest son was previously enrolled in Chada Primary School. Families have long wanted to transfer for their children because of their concerns about their safety and the situation in school, but have not been able to do so successfully.

It was not until the beginning of school in the autumn of 2026 that family members finally contacted a new school that was willing to receive children. However, on the day of the opening of school on 1 September, at noon, the school suddenly indicated that the child did not meet the conditions for admission and removed the parents from the class exchange group.

For the family, new school semesters were already scheduled, and they have changed again.

The family then contacted the private school, which reflected the hand-blooded blood caused by the teachers who cut the child ' s fingernails. The family then claimed that the school concerned had indicated that it was unable to obtain a certificate of school affiliation and that the child had to return to his or her original school.

Whether there were reprisals against families for reporting such incidents, further verification of the links between schools and the records of the processing of education authorities was needed. However, it appears from the statements made publicly by the families that the normal education of the two children continues to be disrupted by different disputes.

The right of children to education should not be affected by conflicts between parents and government agencies.

Even if the school considers that the student does not meet the requirements for admission, there should be a clear admission policy, qualification and normal procedures. For children who have been placed in school, the day of school starter suddenly refuses to accept them, the specific grounds should be specified and their continued compulsory education guaranteed by law.

If parents report that children are subjected to continuous discrimination in school and are forced to change schools, the education authorities are responsible for investigating the existence of ill-treatment of minors.

The report is not registered, why is the supervision of the prosecution in a difficult situation?

The family ' s experience of defending their rights and the fact that they have been involved for years in the long-standing requests of their families to the public security organs to receive reports in accordance with the law, without being able to obtain formal documents.

According to the video statement of the client, which was disclosed by Human Life Watch on 23 August 2026, Von Lidun repeatedly called the police and went to the public security authorities to report the situation and to request an investigation into the alleged violations in schools and hospitals.

He states that when the public security organs refused to open a case, they requested notice of non-registration in order to apply for further relief in accordance with the law, but never obtained it.

The family then went to the prosecution service to seek oversight of the case and was informed that a notice of non-registration by the public security organs was required.

The public security organs do not provide it, as requested by the Public Prosecution Service. Such cycles perpetuate the procedural dilemma of families.

In accordance with articles 169 and 171 of the Rules of Procedure for the Handling of Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs, public security organs are required to follow the procedure for receiving, recording and returning reports, which they are required to receive under the law. Article 178 provides that in cases where a complainant has been examined and a decision not to open a case has been made, a notice of inadmissibility shall be drawn up and served on the complainant within three days.

The law does not require public security organs to make all reports a criminal case, but it sets out the procedure for the public security organs to receive reports, review and form decisions on how to deal with them.

In this case, if the family's question is indeed one that the public security organs should accept and the person concerned has refused to register and process for a long time, the family may not have even obtained the basic legal instruments required for the review and review.

The Public Prosecution Service has the responsibility for the supervision of criminal cases in accordance with the law. In cases where a case should be filed by a public security organ and no case should be filed, supervision may be carried out in accordance with the law. The difficulties reflected by the Von Littons also make the handling of complaints by local prosecution authorities another issue requiring investigation.

It is particularly noteworthy that the impact is not only on the adult reporting, but also on two minor children.

If the public security organs fail to deal effectively with complaints of violations of the physical integrity of children and the prosecution authorities fail to promote the appropriate monitoring, child protection may remain in the institutional document and not play its proper role in specific cases.

From the school abuse dispute to the abuse of public power

The situation of the Von Lidun family reveals an important risk in the functioning of local public power: when a dispute arises between a citizen and a government authority, the procedure that would otherwise be legally binding may be transformed into control over the complainant by the continuation of the complaint.

The incident was initially a medical and school abuse dispute, and families asked for information about any intentional harm, and then gradually involved the failure of the public security authorities to receive reports, the forced medical treatment of the police, difficulties in the supervision of the prosecution and the right of the child to education.

These should be dealt with by different bodies according to law. In the family accounts, however, they do not see a gradual resolution of the dispute, but are constantly facing new administrative and law enforcement obstacles.

The most serious of these is still the experience of the father being forcibly taken to hospital.

Mental health care is highly professional and directly relates to personal freedom. A person who exercises his right to complain cannot be arbitrarily identified as mentally abnormal for his continued criticism of the public security organs and repeated requests for an investigation.

If the police can use mental health care to restrict the movement of whistle-blowers, the right of citizens to report administrative violations and to supervise public authority may be directly threatened.

Similarly, children cannot be held responsible for long-term transfers, school denials or limited educational resources because of disputes between family members and local governments.

The father ' s access to mental health care, the public security response to complaints and the existence of a violation of the rights and interests of the child in schools must be investigated on the basis of the evidence, respectively, and the insistence of the family cannot be used as grounds for denying his legal rights.

There is also a key issue to be clarified in this case: whether there is a real link between the family ' s allegations of alleged drug delivery, the police decision to send a doctor and the relevant treatment at the school.

If these decisions are based on independent and legal grounds, the relevant body shall be able to provide the appropriate records and explanations. Where there are restrictions on reporting by law enforcement officials, responsibility should also be exercised against specific perpetrators and specific decisions.

Family calls for help, child protection #

On 1 November 2026, the von Littons still did not stop their public complaints.

In the latest photographs, two boys were facing the camera on a handwritten help paper. Young children have been involved in family rights for years, they want to return to normal and safe school life, and families are still working to promote the legal response of the public security authorities to alleged violations.

The family also stated that at 0122 hours they received a telephone call from local security officials, who questioned them about the fact that they had reported to the Public Security Reporting Centre and why they continued to reflect on the problem and accused them of “doing business”. The exact timing of this call, the identity of the person and the complete recording of the call are still to be further verified.

The family suffered from the controversy that arose in 2022 when the father was hospitalized, and from 2023 when two children suffered from health disorders, to 2024 and 2025 when the father was taken to a psychiatric hospital by the police, and in September 2026 when the transfer of the child to school was blocked.

As of the time of the submission, no complete statement of the handling of the entire dispute was available in the publicly available information on the authorities of the public security authorities, hospitals and schools of Shigee, nor was there a public judicial determination sufficient to substantiate the allegation of family members having given drugs.

However, the public statements and video material available are sufficient to make the relevant law enforcement procedures, medical referral measures and educational management subjects of public interest.

The responsibility for child protection rests not only on the ex post facto declaration of interest for minors, but also on the availability of the necessary medical examination, the legal reporting procedure and the normal educational guarantees in case of suspected harm to the child.

The Chinese Government has long declared that it will abide by the rule of law and the protection of minors, and has established a corresponding legal regime. The dispute over the appeals of Mau-mi in Guangdong, which has lasted for several years, has precisely brought the practical implementation of these systems at the grass-roots level under scrutiny.

For the Von Lidun family, legal protection should be reflected in specific actions: the health of the child was investigated in accordance with the law, family reports were dealt with in accordance with the law, the reasons for the compulsory medical treatment of the father were subject to legal review and the two children were able to attend school normally.

Two helpers, raised by children, document the situation of the family ' s long-standing complaints. What is really needed is whether local public authorities are able to comply with the law when faced with a complaint and whether the fundamental rights of minors are protected in specific cases.

Original Thread and Related Information

The material concerned includes public calls for help, interviews with people, reports from New Tang and earlier in the New Year, as well as the Mental Health Act and the Rules of Procedure for Public Security Organs in Criminal Cases.

Information note: The report is based on the public information materials, interviews with the media and the legal provisions in force. Allegations involving drug injection, illegal detention, retaliatory law enforcement, etc., which have not yet been independently determined, are dealt with in accordance with the statements of the person concerned. Information on the identity of minors and family contact details is not available.