Against the police arrangement “ paper-based sentence*”, a man decided to draw a circle, draw a prison, start to hold himself in custody13 days, starting on 2 October
Wang Chunsheng: The Sunshine Shinseng Shinseng Shinseng Shinseng Shinseng Hsiung, who have been on the road to environmental protection due to chemical contamination in villages inhabited by generations, has been exposed to several major pollution cases since the creation of the Sunshine Blue Sky Environment in 2015.
1.
In the face of the police's deliberate arrangement to "punish the sentence" for Wang Chun-sheng, Wang won't stand up!
If he was to be punished for his imprisonment, he would not be above the law and would be treated in a special way. All are equal before the law.
Since he has been administratively punished for 13 days in prison, he cannot take this from the Director of Public Security, regardless of how he pleads for him and opens his back door.
The administrative penalty decision of the Public Security Bureau of Suu Guang City was dated 23 September. Contact Wang Chunsheng himself was September
- Wang Chunsheng received this decision from postal mail on 28 September.


However, the decision document indicates that administrative detention is carried out in the Suuen-Gwang City Detention Centre, which is to run from 23 September 2024 to 05 October 2024.

There are two deeply disturbing facts in this report: First, since the decision of the Public Security Department of Suu Xin City on administrative penalties indicates that Wang Chun-sheng needs to begin his prison sentence on 23 September, why did he contact the person concerned two days later? Second, since the law ruled that Wang Chun-sheng was in prison for 13 days, why not arrest him? The police said, “We gave you a 12-day administrative detention decision, but in practice it was not enforced. The blogger adds:
(The 12 days here are supposed to be the wrong and wrong math for the police, from 23 September to 5 October, which is 13 days). Is public power as self-restraint?
Some netizens have indicated that the police have the right to suspend execution on their own.
Is that true?
The Law on Administrative Punishments of the Public Order strictly limits the application of the stay of administrative detention to four elements, which must be met at the same time, not only if the person concerned has to apply for review or initiate proceedings:
First, the detainee has applied for review or initiated proceedings in accordance with the law;
Second, the detainee applied to the public security authorities for a stay of administrative detention;
Third, the public security organs consider that there is no social danger to the detention of detainees for the purpose of suspending administrative detention;
Fourth, the detainee or his close relatives had offered a sponsor or had paid a bond.
Wang Chun-sheng did not file an administrative review with the police, nor did the police issue a notice of suspension of execution to Wang Chun-sheng, and certainly did not pay the so-called bond.
Let's go back to the 2023 case of Wang Sing-sung Shanghai, which once attracted public attention.
The Shanghai Public Security Bureau issued a police briefing in which it was reported that at 4 a.m. on 11 January, a dispute arose between one of Wang ' s four liners who believed that Chen Chi, who was waiting on the roadside, had taken a photograph of him, and that Wang had been beaten by some of them, causing minor injuries to Chen Jo, such as a broken nose. The police imposed administrative detention and fines on the four persons, respectively.
Many people have begun to question whether the police have given special treatment to the battering man because he is Master Si Jin because of his special status. However, the police informed the second paragraph that “the administrative detention of Wang and four of the four persons has been suspended by the public security organs in accordance with the law, in response to the administrative decision of the four persons against them. The next step is to be carried out by the public security organs in accordance with the law, in accordance with the results of the administrative review”.
The notice requires at least a review by the administrative authorities and a fine of $500. Procedurally, there is no flagrant violation of the law.
In the case of Wang Chun-sheng, “Press in paper”, the person concerned was neither brought for administrative review nor fined. Why, so you don't have to go to jail?
I have to say, the police are so nice to Wang Chunsheng.
On 2 October, Wang Chun-sheng decided to draw an elliptical circle, a prison in which he was imprisoned for 13 days in peace and quiet and in prison on paper.
This circle is not the one in which the demons drawn by Sun Goku cannot enter to protect the master, nor is it the square of the "Sacre of Care and Trust" of the film "Square" directed by Rubin Ostrand, a Swedish director.
In 13 days, he can't leave this circle.
Special take-out (breed rice) is arranged in advance of the meal, and the toilet is in the circle (he digs a pit 25 cm long and 60 cm deep in the circle).
He was not able to play his mobile phone for 13 days (no cell phone, for many, the punishment has already been imposed).
Of course, in an emergency, like in a prison, he could also apply for a telephone call from outside.

The sun is heavy, up to 20 degrees during the day, and the circle is nowhere to hide. The first day was the hardest, especially at night, with mosquitoes, and the temperature dropped sharply from more than 20 degrees to 78 degrees, and the dew was heavy, with the skin wetter and the body covered in the sun. And day-deep toilets, together with a bad health and a soreness at night.


The next night, he woke up early before 6:00, and in the middle of the night he was in a sleepless situation. The next day, several times, the pit was dug, and every time I finished the toilet, I had to put on a layer of dirt, which was better than the usual open-air toilet, but still stinks.

2
On the afternoon of 25 September, I was stopped just after I drove into the apartment downstairs and then taken to the interrogation room at the industrial police station. The police said, “We gave you a 12-day administrative detention decision, but it was not actually enforced. Director Kitch asked if we could drop your case? We said, "No, because there are violations." If we want to get the case out, we can get out, and then we can really turn it into a "cure." And the law enforcement team has already reviewed the case, so there's no need to report it to the police. And the police said, "When you have time to meet Director Ji, that's between you guys, we can't be too involved. I said, "Are you saying I'm a partner with Director Ji?" Don't be ridiculous! Then the Tati police sent me the decision to sign the detention, and I wanted to read it carefully, and the police stopped it, and said, "You don't have to look so closely, we'll give you a copy, which was sent to you yesterday through the post. The police said, "It would be good for you to get more positive images of the Zhui light later, or else the director might be upset and ask us to enforce your administrative detention decision according to law." The blogger adds:
...and I'm not gonna let you go.
The police officers went to the side to brief the leader on this conversation with me before they let me go home.
On the evening of 28 September, I received a decision on punishment for 12 days of administrative detention from the Public Security Department of Suu Xin City, which was served by registered mail.
Wang Chun-sheng's self-statement
3
- 3
Wang Chun-sheng was sentenced to 13 days in prison for “disturbing the normal social order by posting his false video of speech on the Internet in July 2024 through the Wireless Friends Circle, Wireless Public, Wireless Video, Dial, Moi Ping and Bo Ping, and then being viewed and transmitted by his friends”.
What is the "false speech video"?
I'm not sure.
Sundong Sunshine Mouths Seafood Poisoning* / Wang Chunsheng
(i) Statement of the case of Zhu
With regard to the unexpected and suspicious circumstances that have arisen in the proceedings of the Shou Xhihai Public Security Department in the case of “insult” in which Zhu Chihai was tried, I have described in detail in the previous article and have attached evidence to prove that the video of my statements on the web platforms of micro-friends, micro-fisscals, micro-intelligence publics and microblogs is an objective and well-documented fact, and is not a mere one, so the conclusions of the public security authorities that are considered “impressives” are erroneous and should be corrected.
(ii) Incident of seafood poisoning in sheep mouth
On July 7, 2024, I received a tweet from a sheep-spoken fisherman: “We had another defecation and a stinking smell in our sheep's mouth that day”, and sent me a video about the river drain, with a text saying, “8 individuals were playing around digging up, eating home, one person died, seven people were poisoned. And then another tweet from a fishing wisher saw someone who had made similar venomous remarks: "No fish friends in the river recently, several sheep-snatch convoys," and then they responded, "Pips," "Pips," "Little lead poisoning," "Big blood exchange." When I saw the comment that his relatives were eating seafood and poisoning, the credibility of the story was rising at an extraordinary rate. And the fact that a lot of people in the Internet have made similar statements in the video that exposes the sewage of the mouth of the sheep, is more proof of the real possibility, not to mention the empty air.
In addition, there are a number of similar comments
Attached Interception
One.

Two.

Three.

In addition, there are a number of similar comments

In the light of the responsibilities of a volunteer for the environment to be realistic, a basic test of the truth of the statements received, and although the evidence and analysis largely confirm that the truth is greater, I sent the information obtained through the letter to Deputy Director Liu Feng of the Public Security Bureau of Shou Xin City, with the hope that their public security organs would help to verify the reliability and authenticity of the events, but eventually it was also unchallenged! The relevant screenshot is as follows:
Four.

5

I eventually found the wife of the victim of seafood poisoning in a variety of interviews, and she learned from her mouth: “They had nine people poisoned after eating seafood, one of them dead, her husband; 1 A person who entered the intensive care unit for rescue is her second daughter-in-law; Other light-toxic seven people, in-patient injection observation. "What kind of poison is it that is in seafood?" They were not known, so how many of the people interviewed were suspicious that seafood poisoning could have been caused by contamination?
But as a responsible environmental volunteer, no one will ever believe a word until he has been provided with the true evidence, so no video of any statement about seafood poisoning due to contamination has been released!
Talk to the deceased's wife

Namang Su-Yong City/ Red women as wives of the deceased
(iii) Investigation resistance
When I first arrived in Namangu, I was apparently treated in the opposite way as I was interviewed for the second time in the town of Shibuya, and this time I refused to answer any questions, was basically silent, and sometimes I was forced to leave and said I didn't want to talk about it. I realized that I had the first interview with her, that some friends said the odds were captured by the secret services in time, and that they were talking to and pressured the deceased's family? Otherwise, she wouldn't have resisted me so much! It seems that the real reason for the more seafood poisoning from her mouth is no longer possible, so I'm trying to ask each other where the seafood is being dug. And it means that without them, the wife of the deceased pointed to a man who was playing cards north, and said, "This time he went with him to dig the tarts, and he took the P.S. 110 to identify the scene, and I went to ask him to tell you! ♪ I'm not gonna be ♪ I noded, and she came back, and she said, "He didn't want to say, he was afraid of getting in trouble," but the wife of the deceased added, "I went with them to dig the tarts, and the place was... And then I went to the Qing River in Sheepton, where she said, and it was only after a lot of inquiries that I knew that there were lots of places to dig for tarts and lots of areas. So it seems very difficult to find a specific location without the man who dug the poison tungsten to lead him.


Single River Bridge, Fishport, sheep mouth centre
But when I think of online monitoring of the small Qing River into the mouth of the sheep's mouth that I had previously checked through the Blue Map, it shows that the water quality here has been a poor five categories of data for months each year for so many years. The following is a screenshot:


Water quality monitoring data online
So we decided to leave the seafood poisoning for a while, to select several representative points for seafood breeding in and around the river, to take a look at the soil of the small clean river, and to see if there was any over-standard contamination? But this was soon threatened by the authorities, "I heard you've been jumping and jumping lately." In this context, the victim's medical report and the second daughter's hospital record are even more difficult to get. So far, it's been a fog for us alone! ♪ I'm not gonna be ♪
(iv) What is the weight of truth and passion?
I also tried to get the authorities to find out the truth by means of online exposure, but was quickly asked to be deleted by the chief of the Suu Xin City Public Security Bureau, whose deputy director also stated: “There is no such thing as death and poisoning. "Now the internet rumors are about to be erased." I'm sorry. The micro-credit dialogue is illustrated below:



This is my response and explanation for the false information on seafood poisoning contained in the administrative sanction of the Public Security Department of Suu Xin City.
(v) Where are surface water tests?
The Public Security Department of Suu Xin City also referred to “evidence of evidence such as surface water test reports” in the evidence contained in the decision on administrative penalties, but did not indicate what time was taken to test surface water samples at which point in the river? Is it a test at the place where the tweezers were dug? Or is it a test at a river drain? Everything is not clear. But with regard to the river diversion, I called the staff of the Sunlight City Environment Agency, who explained that they had not released the sewage on the video since they had arrived. I told them that the sewage video was taken by local fishermen at the scene, and it's hard to get caught if it's a rinsing. The staff said they had gone to the water sample and were going to commission a third-party environmental company to conduct a test. I said, "What's the point of this sample if you don't find any persistent sewage on the scene?" The other side was silent. (A recorded recording)
(vi) Inverted Black & White?
I am very incomprehensible to the staff of the SSP Advocacy Department for the rumouring to the relevant web platform that the river-water sewage video site is not a succulent mouth; The Director of the Department of Lifelight Ecology, Tim Pei-Lang, has said that the alleged sewage video was three years ago. It is thus clear in this public opinion that it is more difficult to find out the truth than to go to heaven, and if you insist on the truth, you may risk going to prison! ♪ I'm not gonna be ♪ The evidence is summarized below:


(vii) Those who know can't speak again?
And the man who posted the poisoning of the sheep-script convoy in the fishing wi-fi group, who was afraid to continue talking, saying, "The sheep never let go of the... ...you don't want to hurt me. I'm not going to be able to get a job. The following is a screenshot:

So this is getting weird, and we even got a guy who contacted the branch clerk of Minanmura, asking questions about the tung-tai poisoning, and then he kept quiet, and he didn't even want to tell the name of the intoxicator, and he didn't know where he came from?
(vii) Introduction to the Hamguchi Chemical Park
The main industrial parks in Goose Town include the suupor-polymers industrial estate, the new materials estate of sheep-poohs and the Supemian Sea Economic Development Area. The succultive aerochemicals estate is located in the Sunk City's sheep mouths, and is planned to cover an area of 19.84 square kilometres from East to Saltdu Road, West to West Ring Road, South to South Sea Road, North to Camp Trench and Landscape Biotech Project. The estate is dominated by salinization, new materials and medicines, pesticide intermediates and petrochemicals. The new materials estate of sheep is also located in the town of Shengkang, Sumiang City, Shandong Province, and is concerned with the new materials-related industry. The Zone of Economic Development of the Lifelines, located on the southern side of the Bay of Phuilai County, is located in a small Qing River, covering an area of 883 square kilometres, and is divided into six functional areas, including the Advanced Manufacturing Industry, the High Technology Industrial Area, the Port Logistics Industry, the Marine Fine Chemical Industry Area, etc. The list of chemical plants in Sukuoka-Samazu Shuenjiang includes the Sukuzu Lin Sea Chemicals Company, Sukuzu City Zhuang Chemical Industries Limited, Shandong Brothers Technology Company Limited, Sakuyu Luang Chemical Limited, Haku Sundong Yui Chemical Technology Co. Ltd, Shandong Lungi Chemical Co. Ltd., Sukuzu Yongkang Chemical Industries Ltd., Branch III, Sukuzu Sukumi East Chemical Industries Limited, Sukuzu Sun-Yung Akichi Chemical Industries Co. Ltd., Sukuzu Xuan City Sea Dragon Network Equipment Co. Ltd., Sukuzu Xuan City Sea Dragon Network Co. Ltd., and Sukuang City Chang Sing Chemical Co. Ltd.


Special reminder: The data above are from the network, and please be realistic!
Finally,
To ask for help from friends who care about Shandong and the truth,
To help reproduce this article with 10 public signs!
Original source
- Original title
- 不服,一个男人决定自我囚禁13天
- Original author
- 转自隐拾
- Source account / outlet
- 微信公众号“剧照”
- Originally published
- 2024-10-05 01:01
- Content treatment
- Republished
- Original article
- View original ↗
- Published by China Focus
- 聚焦中国


Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…