The logic of the reverse trial of whether the new court decided to establish the “curatorship” was that the trial had not been conducted.
During the second trial of the accused, the defence of the accused, Wang Yong Li and Wang Yong Li, who were still in the Liangli province, and who were organizing, leading and participating in the organization of the mafia, the court of Liangin Province, filed a well-known complaint against the Court of Liaoning Province, stating that the new Court of China was “not tried first” and that it was no longer appropriate to exercise jurisdiction to apply for referral to the Provincial High Court, which was brought before it by the Liaoning Province High Court or other lower court was appointed to hear the case.
The steel industry is a well-known private entrepreneur in the city of Linghai (under the jurisdiction of Jinzhou), who operates a number of businesses, including real estate, construction and transport, and is the largest taxpayer in the city.
01
The program is reversed into a closed-end unheard loop.
The case of the Jinxi Black is under the designated jurisdiction, and 23 defendants were prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor ' s Office of the new county of Zhuang to the Xian Xinhu District Court. The case was opened on 11 July 2023, after three months, and the first instance judgement was delivered by the New District Court on 22 April 2026 (carried out on 9 May), which was 853 pages long.
The new county court, for the offence of organizing and leading a gang of gangs in the name of the Sing-Sing, decided to execute 25 years of imprisonment and to confiscate all the property of the individual, with a number of penalties.
Wang Yong Li was guilty of membership in a gang organization, and was punished with several offences, and decided to execute him with 17 years and 7 months ' imprisonment and to confiscate all his property.
Among the 23 accused, Wang Yong-gil and Wang Yong-li was sentenced to heavy sentences; One accused died in custody and another became a vegetable while in custody, which was not included in the judgement; The remaining 21 were sentenced to various prison terms of varying lengths for various offences.
The defendants, Wang Yong Li and others, appealed to the New County Court within the statutory time limit against the first instance judgement of the new County Court.
In accordance with our principle of two-judge final judgements, the first instance judgement of the New County Court, which was not entered into force, was appealed to the New Central Court within the statutory period of 10 days.
Three other persons associated with the black-skin case were accused in a separate case before the Xin Xin Ning County Court, namely Yang Jingbo, Chief of the Security Brigade of the Lianghai City Public Security Department, Wang Fukuyama, former Deputy Director of the Two Lamb Police Station, and Yang Hong Kong, civilian police officer (retired) of the Two Lamb Police Station.
Yang Zingbo was charged with harbouring organizations of a mafia nature, and Wang Fukuyama and Yang Hong were just charged with abuse of authority, harbouring and condoning organizations of a mafia nature. The charges against three police officers are the “curator umbrella” of the mob, commonly known as the common people.

New Central Court

The decision of the Xinxiang District Court states that Yang Jingbo, as a people ' s police officer, was wearing police uniforms to accompany the black men and their organization in the collection of seed, using police identities as a psychological coercion to facilitate the success of the forced trade.
The revitalization convoy is a bus route from Linghai City to Jinzhou, contracted by the Government. Wang Fukuyama and Jinghong Kong have found that the revitalization of the convoy line has been in violation of the law for more than a decade, and that it has repeatedly engaged in stop-and-stop, threats, acts of harassment and beatings.
Yang Jingbo and Jinghong have been serving in the area for a long time, dealing with the police on several occasions, and with the organized commission of criminal offences against the convoy, with the subjective knowledge that it is being used only as a security mediation, without criminal prosecution and with the objective of allowing the gangs to continue their crimes.
On 20 May 2026, the Xin Xin Xin District Court sentenced Yang Zing Bo to seven years ' imprisonment for having committed crimes of organized crime of a black society.
On 21 May 2026, the Xin Xinhu District Court, acting as a criminal to condone the organization of the mafia, imposed a number of offences and penalties, and sentenced the person to six years and three months ' imprisonment; The criminal, who had just condoned organized crime of a mafia nature, had been punished with several offences and had been sentenced to six years and three months ' imprisonment.
The first instance judgements of the Xinxiang District Court were appealed by the Yang Jingbo, Wang Fukushan and Jinghong Kong within the statutory time limit to the Xinxi Central Court.
The case of Yang Zhengbok-Boon, a member of the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice, was held in public session on 18 September 2026, and the final decision “rejecting the appeal and upholding the sentence” was issued on 29 September of the same year. In the case of Wang Fukuyama and Yanghong, which had been condoning the organization, there was no public hearing and on 28 September 2026 a final decision was issued “dejecting the appeal and upholding the sentence”.
Whether or not the final decision of Wang Yong-ryo is “black-faced”, the first instance decision of the new county court has at least been procedurally lawful. “On 9 May, the decision in the case of the Sing Li, Wang Yong Li, and the decision in the case of Yang Zingbo, Wang Fukushan and Jinghong Kong were delivered on 20 May, the basic logic of which was that only if the case of the Black was established could an “Aparge” be found.
But the "no first decision" logic of the "Next-instance" in the case against the "Singstyre" and Wang Yong Li in the second trial, which found that Yang Zingbo, Wang Fukushan and Jinghong Kong triad had committed crimes.
02
The new court has avoided the law.
It is a fact that needs to be clarified that the judges of the Sing Li case, Wang Yong Li, and the members of the Full Court of Yang Jingbo, Wang Fukushan and the Yang Hong Kong Ganga “Patron” case are identical to the three judges of the new court.
The ordinary procedure should have been to identify the organization, leadership and membership of the organization, and the new court should have concluded after the hearing. But it is surprising that the new courtyard has reversed the proceedings.
In the case of Wang Fukuyama, the case against Hyanghonggang and Yang Zingbo, the second trial was held on 28 and 29 September 2026, respectively, in which the crimes of harbouring and condoning organizations of a criminal nature were found to have been committed and the organization of a criminal nature led by a criminal organization headed by a criminal member of the criminal society was found to have been tolerated and harboured.
The new court of the court of the new court of the house of the house of the Zhong Yi, Wang Yong Li and others “not tried in advance”, thus creating a special interest for both parties. This particular interest means that the members of the Full Court have no more recourse to the trials of the Sing-Sing, Wang Yong-Li and others, let alone to a fair trial.
The Supreme Law's provisions on the judicial interpretation of the Code of Criminal Procedure require that not only the three members of the Full Chamber should recuse themselves, but also the New Lieutenant Court should recuse itself as a whole for “other reasons”, so that the defence has filed an application with the Liaoning Provincial Court for the Court's inadvisability to exercise jurisdiction.

Teleway
There are also precedents in judicial practice for successful applications for transfer. In the case of the related crime of concealment, the Harbin Central Court first determined that the person in the harbour was an aggravating circumstance for Liu, who was the organizer and leader of the organization that harboured the mafia. The defence submits that this situation is typically “unpredicted” and that the court hearing the related case can no longer act as the second instance court in the case.
(a) The court of second instance, aware of its own error, initiated a retrial in the case of the harbouring, and attempted to consider it as still competent on this ground; The defence continued to challenge the fact that the defence opinion was eventually adopted by the High Court of Heilongang Province and the Provincial Prosecutor ' s Office, which considered that the courts of first and second instance were no longer competent and assigned the case to other municipal courts.
The case of the black steel case is exactly the same as in the case. The New Central Court of the Yang Jingbo case has found that the organization of the mafia, headed by the steel, is no longer appropriate as a second instance court in the case of the steel, Wang Yong Li and others.
Of particular importance is the large number of new evidence submitted by the defence in the case of Wang Yong Li and Sing Li during the second trial, which directly proves that the first instance judgement of the new county court was wrong in finding the key facts that affected the numerous convictions.
The new court and the aforementioned persons, having received these evidence, and knowing that it was essential for the conviction of the crime and non-crime in the present case, and in defence of their “not tried first” conclusion in the Yang Zingbo case, firmly rejected the opening of the trial of the case against Sing Li, Wang Yong Li and others, apparently with the aim of making a mistake, which is already suspected of being a violation of the law.
- Hey, hey, hey, hey.
A little light #
I'm so full of shit.

Original source
- Original title
- 佟钢涉黑案形成未审先判闭环 二审阜新中院被申请集体回避
- Original author
- 成京昊
- Source account / outlet
- 微信公众号“霖点在线”
- Originally published
- 2026-11-06 17:47
- Content treatment
- Republished
- Original article
- View original ↗
- Published by China Focus
- 会员发布
Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…