The report revealed that the prosecutor's office was acting as a “curator”.

The conciliation certificate, which came into effect at 14.9 million yuan, was implemented for six years and was delivered at $8471.2.

I have said this word countless times, and I will do it again today. Because many people ask me the same question: Why is your case so unsettled for six years?

I have always said that it was the Executive Liu Dong-hyun who hid, ran away and transferred property. But six years later, when I pulled the top of the fog over and over again, when one or two of my men had "handled" my case, and then they got killed, found, and resigned, I finally saw the long-sought answer:

This case is not going to work. It's never gonna work alone.

– It's the "Inner" of the Zhengzhou Gacheng district, a public security guard, who has the power to support Liu Dong-hyun with his own protection.

Today I'll take this umbrella one by one and sundown. The court, the umbrella; The police, the umbrella. And the first thing I'm going to do is to get the pelvis on top of it -- the court.

I. The court first

My case has been resumed three times in six years. The following list of judges who have been in possession of it is drawn up:

(2020) Promulgation of Case No. 6259

• Executive Judges: Yong-hong, Men Ling Army, Wang Shijin, Assistant Judge, Tsuzu-Yu;

(2021) Resign Case No. 2455

• Executive Judges: Wang Dong Ming, Wang Shijin, Anjilin, Dong Yamin.

What happens to the people on this list?

(Yon Yong-hong, photo from the Internet)

On 2 September 2025, the Supervisory Board of the Zhengzhou City and City Disciplinary Commission publicly informed that the Deputy Secretary, Vice-President of the Party of the People ' s Court of the Chu State and the District of Chumzhou and Senior Judge Zhou Yong-hong of the Fourth Class were under disciplinary review and inspection for serious disciplinary offences.

• Reopening the curriculum vitae of Yong-hong Zheng, Deputy Secretary, Vice-President, Permanent Vice-President, members of the Judicial Commission and Judges of the People's Court Group of the Zhengzhou District of New Technologies Industrial Development. He served permanently at the Zhengzhou District Court, where he was transferred to the Central Province Court only on 20 April 2022, when he was taken to the position of Vice-President, Justice Council, and Justice, as Deputy Secretary and Vice-President of the Party of the Zhengzhou Gao Xinxing District Court in

1. I have in mind 0191 the deposit of the executive ruling 6259, the presiding judge, writing "Yon Yong-hong" in black and white.

(Mong Ling Army, photo from the Internet)

(King Shifu, photo from the Internet)

According to sources from the Court, the Public Prosecutor ' s Office: the Meng Ling Army, the Chief Executive Officer of the Zhengzhou Court of Gao Xin, was taken away in secret; The Deputy Director of the Executive Board, Wang Shiqing, was forced to resign voluntarily from the political party and his office phone has been picked up by a woman to ask him where he is, and he is obviating me and East Lassi.

(Note: The final notification of the Inspection Authority is based on the information of the Meng Ling Army, the Wang Shia dispute; Yong Yong-hong was found to be an official public communiqué, in black and white, irrefutable. I'm not sure.

These are the same people I named the executive judge who reported to the patrol on 9 July

1. The core of my report is not a general "ineffectiveness of enforcement" but a situation expressly prohibited by article 46 of the Judges Act: the deliberate failure to execute the property of the person being executed creates the illusion that the person being executed " has no property to enforce " and is blatantly concealed in the execution of the decision.

I'll take this court umbrella, one by one, with two sets of property and two hard evidence.

II. Two sets of properties: the first one, on what basis is not disposed of for six years?

(i) Central Hong Kong 3401

• First name, net, residence, but "not in a position to dispose of"

I'm not gonna be able to

Liu Dong-Hing, in the name of Liu, is located in Unit 1 D-2 East River Road, South West Road, South-West Province of Young People's Republic of China, on the 34th Floor (contract No. ZM 1600242958), which is the first -enclosed, occupied, fully operational and fully capable of disposal.

How does a court deal with a room like this?

(2020) Prove 0191 Implementing award 6259: set aside on the grounds that "the contract number cannot be disposed of" ;

(2021) Rewinding decision No. 2455: on the grounds that "the registration of real estate title has not been obtained and is not eligible for disposal".

The Tribunal of the Canton of Nakayan, in November 2020, decided to cancel the contract for the purchase and sale of the property and ordered Liu to pay a deposit of 2158.98 yuan; On 30 August 2022, the Sino-Singo County Court (2021) set a deadline for the seizure of Case No.

1. Even the Central-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino-Sino District Court was seized and the first court, although it was not a single auction, it was not opened.

Why can't we handle it? Because once the auction is over, the money is in my hands. The first, netted, occupied and currently disposed of room was lying in the hands of the Zhengzhou Gae Xuan District Court for six years, without moving once. This is not a question of ability, it's an issue of attitude, it's a question of "I don't want to move, I don't want to move, I can't move."

(ii) Room 604 Durant Street

• same court, two faces

In the name of Liu Dong-hing, located in Building 1-604 of Durang Street, 103rd District of Gao Newsing, I gave his property search form (time of inquiry 13 January

1. to the Executive Board, which the judge has not seized.

The decision states that the Land Planning and Residence Authority was taken, that " no advance sale was filed and could not be seized ", and that an information note was issued on 7 January 2022, stating that the house was online on 18 December 2019 and that the pre-sale confirmation was not completed in the contract filing window.

But the most ridiculous scene has come

(2021) Pre-empting 0191 Repositary 2455 in the final version of July 19,

1. Just a few days later, on 9 August 2022, the same Chengzhou District Court (2021) decided to execute Case No. 5246 (in the case of Liu Dongheing) and seized the building.

The same house, same court, 20 days apart.

Here I am, "Unpre-sold, unsealable" At Ningjie's, it's "As soon as possible."

Japan was reinstated in February 2023 and only awaiting closure

• the initial right of seizure is no longer available. In the end, Liu Dong-hyun gave this 604 to a third person, and my case is missing an enforceable property.

The same property, my case is "unmanageable" and the case against someone else is "sequel."

What is this?

This is not an oversight, it is not a question of capacity, it is a deliberate failure to implement, a deliberate watering, and a deliberate time for Liu to move his property clean.

I wrote in the report: I've only received $8471.32 since May 2020, when I applied for enforcement. Apart from the transfer of property by Liu Dong-hyun himself, the most important reason is that the reported judge deliberately failed to implement the law, giving Liu Hong-hyun sufficient buffer time to empty bank accounts and repay the enforceable property to others.

Cases prohibited by article 46 of the Judges Act

• corruption, fraud, unfair adjudication; (b) Concealing, falsifying, falsifying or intentionally destroying evidence; (b) Deliberate violation of the laws and regulations; (b) Delays in the processing of cases, errors in the work; (b) Use of office for private gain; Accepting the transmission of the interests of the person and the agent
• Six articles, I've reported them.

Three or two hard evidences: a ruling passed with an empty card

Someone would say that it's not a speculation that you talk to "the whistleblower" alone?

Okay, I'll get two more, hard evidence that can handle any kind of verification -- all legal and bank correspondence, in black and white, right here.

Testimony I: a ruling written in "Tomorrow"

I'm not gonna be able to

(2020) Precedence of Executive Decision No. 6259, leaving the payment on 27 August

1. The text of the decision clearly states that

(2020) Promulgation of Executive Decision No. 6259, with deposit date 27 August 2000. The text of the decision clearly states that

" The Court informed the applicant of the implementation of the case, the measures of property investigation, the property of the person executed, the basis for the conclusion of the enforcement proceedings and the legal consequences thereof, and heard his views on the conclusion of the enforcement proceedings on 28 August

1. "..

August 27th Sunset Award, but describing August 28th as the "notification" hearing.

What does that mean? This means that the award is based on a prior conclusion, a first payment and that the statutory procedure is followed and not even done. The pre-pre-trial procedure, which is expressly provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure, must be " known to the applicant and heard " before the final version is made available as a verb in the decision. August 27th Judge, how did you get the "pregnition" one day in advance of August 28th? How did you end up "agree" for me without seeing me and listening to me?

Even the legal procedures on the surface are re-signed, and what are the checks, seals, freezes behind the file?

Stone II: Freeze a zero-dollar card and release 8.5 million currents

On 12 August 2020, the court network seized and blocked an account (account number

1. held by Liu Dong-hing China Bank of Commerce and Industry, and frozen the amount of $1516496, with a cumulative deduction of $0.00.

I personally verified: This Caribou has not been paid, and none of the accounts were entered, no one was released, and the balance remains zero.

And what are the dozens of bank cards that Liu Dong-hing is doing during the same period, including: Min-Sheng, Pufa, Wah Ha, Post, Construction, Zhengzhou Bank?

• Every day, every day, every day. (a) Single entry and exit accounts of more than $5,000, with a cumulative amount of over $2.57 million; After preliminary audit, Liu Donghing ' s total bank flow for the same period was close to $8.5 million.

A dozen cards, 8.5 million currents, can be found on the Internet, frozen by one key, none of the courts is frozen.

They're freezing, a dead card with zero balances and no running water.

And then the freezer with this card said to me, "We've checked, he has no money. "..

And then on August 27, 2020, the "Cross" ruling, the final.

Frozen cards, for the applicant -- "Look, we're freezing 1.5 million, move out."

The live card is for the executed person — "This card is for you not to use, the other cards you walk as usual, I won't move."

Is that a match? Is that a benefit? Is that a crime? I'm not going to make a conclusion. I'm going to ask the disciplinary inspection.

IV. The umbrella of the public security: the crime of refusing to obey, why "no investigation, no investigation"?

The court has broken the umbrella, and the police has the umbrella.

On 18 January 2024, the District Court of Zhengzhou, Gao Xinxing, referred the execution file relating to Liu ' s alleged refusal to execute the sentence and the conviction to the High New Division of the Public Security Bureau of Zhengzhou City for review. The investigation was not formally opened until 15 May 2024 and has not been completed.

A person who is a defendant of 58 bank cards, 8.5 million water, 10 housing units, low-cost cars and private transfers of property, has been accused of refusing to comply with the charges, and the public security case has been pending for a long time.

(spurified thick, photo from the web)

On this occasion: The former Secretary of the High Newly Newly-Specific Board, the Chief of the Police, the Pure Thick, was examined

• the Henan Provincial Disciplinary Commission, which informed the Board on 28 April 2026 that it had irregularly received high-quality white wine and gifts from various management clients between 2014 and 2020, and that it had other serious disciplinary offences, had been dismissed from the party, had withdrawn its retirement treatment and had been referred to the prosecution. The time span of the Executive Director's term spans 2020, I applied for an enforcement and refusal to comply with the charges to the new bureau that he had led in January 2024.

It was also revealed by the prosecution law sources that the head of the branch in question Quo Minglang had also been removed. His fate is bound to be served by his suspicion of being unsolved, unsolved and unjust.

It is understood that the Bureau is currently chaired by the former Council, , and it is hoped that the Commission will help me to resolve the practical problems in question as soon as possible, as required by law, and that the case will be settled and ironed, and that it will not be delayed, as I cannot afford to do so any longer.

(Chou Minglang, photo from the Internet)

In January 2024, the case was opened in May 2024

• the cylindrical thick was found in April

1. For more than two years, the clue to the refusal to commit crimes was like a hot potato, covered in the hands of the public security authorities, lying on the ground and dragging it.

Why are you dragging?

Because if Liu's refusal to commit a crime is to be found, those who will take his place in the "save, house, car" will be exposed in broad daylight.

So this case has to be "no case, no case." These six words, not based on false words -- the pure and thick notification of the police station in Gao Xin, has written a bloody note to the team. The ulterior circumstances of the situation in the area of the High New District Court are not the same as those of the old and old obstinate Zone Court.

V. Concluding remarks: The umbrella has been in place for six years and should collapse

Six years, 1.49 million, and the account is $8471.32.

A case is not moving forward and may be difficult to implement; Can you sign your final ruling, when the president of the court is checked, when the first house is not disposed of for six years, when 8.5 million people are frozen with only one card, when the evidence of the refusal to commit crimes is undetected -- then it is not called a difficult execution, and it is called a refusal to let it advance.

One to cross &quat; Tomorrow. The decision, a frozen card with zero balances: where are you at Zhengzhou Gacheng District Court?

The court umbrella: Yong Yong-hong, was searched; According to the news, the Meng Ling Army has fallen and Wang has resigned. The judges who had dealt with my case left their posts one by one.

The umbrella handle of public security: the Zen is pure, and has been investigated; According to reports, Qiu Ming is up and down. The substations that received my refusal to commit crimes were also being systematically cleaned up.

It's not a coincidence.

This is evidence of the system's clean-up of the gang of criminals who are in the same position as the old Lian.

I wrote the report and the article, not to insult anyone. I would like to ask you solemnly: Zhengzhou Intermediate People's Court, Zhengzhou People's Procuratorate, Zhengzhou City Public Security Bureau, Zhengzhou City Council Political and Law Commission, Zhengzhou City City Council, Zhengzhou City Council and the supervisory and supervisory body — to look carefully at this case, to look into the six-year execution of the case, to ask the executed man Liu Dong-hyeng, who has been at large, to find out where the 8.5 million currents have been, and to find out why the first property was not disposed of for six years and why he refused to follow up the charges without investigating them.

The umbrella lasted six years, it's time to fall.

149 million, it's time to come back.

I also know that no one in this case can take down a mole by themselves. So I wrote it all out in the original, and I gave it to the public, to the supervisory authority.

Only if power is to be in the sun and the umbrella behind every old man is to be uprooted will Wang Minceng need not be an instrument in force for six more years.

Excusing statement

The public information cited in this paper

Disclaimer

The public information cited in this paper

One. (a) Communication dated 2 September 2025 from the Monitoring Board of the Zhengzhou City Disciplinary Commission, Henan Province: HONG Yonghong (Deputy Secretary and Vice-President of the Party of the People ' s Court of the Chumzhou District of China);

1. On 28 April 2026, the Supervisory Board of the Henan Provincial Disciplinary Commission informed that the Zheng Shuu Shui (former Secretary, Director General of the High-level Division of the Zhengzhou City Public Security Bureau) had been inspected, dismissed from the party and abolished his retirement.

1. The text "disclosed by the source" (the fall of the Mensing Army, the resignation of Wang Shiqing, the rise of Qu Ming, etc.) is subject to official notification by the inspection body.

1. This document is published with the authorization of the parties.