General Secretary Xi's important speech stated:
“The negative impact of one wrong case is enough to destroy the good image accumulated by ninety-nine fair judges. One-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand-thousand.”
“To fairness and justice, we must build a iron army of justice that is loyal to cleanliness and integrity.”
"We strive to make the people feel fair in every judicial case."
“Law is the written morality, and morality is the inner law.”
"We must adhere to strict law enforcement, promote true goodness and beauty, fight against false evil and ugliness.We must adhere to fair justice, and give play to the function of punishing justice and punishing goodness."
It is necessary to strengthen the rectification of strong dishonest acts against the masses in accordance with the law."
“Let the perpetrators be punished and paid a price.”
(A lawyer was told not to carry mobile phones or computers into the court, and was intercepted outside the court.)
The Penn language.
Tagged with: Lzkj328, Lzkj328
Today (September 3), at 14:30 p.m., the second court of the Chongqing two-Jiang new district court in the 28th building No. 1 of the new district of Qinghai-Hongqing, two honor rights disputes cases are about to be heard.
The case number (2026) of the 0157 people's initiative 26613 and (2026) of the 0157 people's initiative 26733 of the plaintiff, the defendant said.
He argued that the article I published on July 29, 2025, "18 sets of evidence to uncover the history of prostitution of the billionaire in Chongqing", titled "Millionaire prostitution history", attracted the public eye, the content of the article spread the privacy of the plaintiff and repeatedly insulted and degraded the plaintiff with words such as " prostitution".
Prosecution requests
He proposed that on November 10, 2025, I published an article entitled "Chongqing wealthy women traitors are condemned by the court", entitled "Chongqing wealthy women traitors" attract the public's eye, the content of the article spread the plaintiff's personal privacy and repeatedly insulted and degraded the plaintiff with "man shit" and "mouse crossing the street".
The lawsuit request:
The two articles claimed a total of $1,73500.
On the 29th of July, the lawyer and lawyer Zheng Yata met with Liu Marines in Chongqing’s two-Jiang District Court Airport Trial District and made their first exchange.
The trial is not open, nor does the trial be public.
Before the trial, Liu had never called me.
But this afternoon’s trial has not yet begun, and a “great show” has already taken place outside the court.
Before the trial, Mr. Fang and Mr. Jiang Yu lawyers were stopped outside the court.
At the entrance to the courthouse on the second floor, a large crowd of law enforcement officers and judges awaited. Lawyers and audiences were stopped outside the courthouse.
The judge declared that the case will not be heard publicly.
Lawyers were told not to carry mobile phones or computers into the court.
Phantom lawyer on the spot questioned: we have come to the door, you do not let in (the court) hearing did not indicate that it is not public trial, so you can not explain at will, if it is not public trial, the judge needs to say in advance, the hearing did not indicate that it is not public trial.
Van lawyer said that our files are in the computer and don't let it work with the computer?
Jiang Zhou lawyer asked: "Please let the judge notify us of the non-public trial, can you explain?"
Article 137 of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that "People's courts shall hear civil cases publicly, except as it relates to state secrets, personal privacy or otherwise provided by law."
A case of honour disputes, neither involving state secrets nor involving juvenile crimes, why not openly trial?
The "personal privacy" claimed by Ho Mou
- the content of the judgment sentenced publicly by the Jiangsu District Court, and the content of his ex-wife Li Mou publicly exposed and read up to 330,000 divorce inscriptions on the microblog
- has long been public information.
Article 151 of the Regulations on Disciplinary Punishment of the Communist Party of China stipulates that “When a woman prosecutor of the Fifth Chamber of the Chongqing Municipal Procuratorate has an unlawful sexual relationship with others and has an adverse effect, a warning or a serious warning shall be imposed; where the circumstances are more severe, a punishment shall be imposed for the withdrawal of office within the Party or for the stay in the Party; where the circumstances are serious, a punishment shall be imposed for expulsion from the Party.”
Wang some Dan as a party member, with a wife's husband adultery, behavior lasted for years, the situation is serious, the public opinion is upset this is what kind of privacy?
All the people were stopped outside the court.
The former Northern District Court questioned several witnesses on its own: the nurse indicated that a certain person had "forced a relationship" with her, and the company manager of a certain person indicated that "as long as the women did not let go".
Article 110 of the Criminal Procedure Law states:
Any unit or individual who finds that there are criminal facts or criminal suspects shall have the right and the duty to report or report to the public security organs, the people's procuratorate or the people's court.The public security organs, the people's procuratorate or the people's courts shall accept the report, accusation or report.For those who do not belong to their jurisdiction, they shall transfer the competent authority to handle it and notify the applicant, the accuser, the reporting person; for those who do not belong to their jurisdiction and must take urgent measures, they shall first take emergency measures, and then transfer the competent authority.
The above-mentioned rape accusations are no longer a simple matter of prostitution, but the record of the allegations of rape against several witnesses made by the former Northern District court has not been handed over to the prosecutor's office and the public security organs, and the suspected crime has been covered up.
General Secretary Xi Jinping pointed out that, according to the law, it is necessary to strengthen the rectification of the people's strong misconduct, which reflects strong misconduct.""Let the defeaters be punished and paid a price.""It is clear that the practice of the two-jiang new district court contradicts the requirements of the central leadership.
In the previous honor rights case, Judge Li-Shiang "questioned the secretary" to judge the case, Judge Zhao Zhiqiang invented the privacy protection theory "not related to the public interest."
Now, Liu Marine Judge has taken over the new case, the first thing is "not public trial": not to bring mobile phones, computers, lawyers can not conduct normal trial records and information consultation; not public trial, listening to the masses can not witness the trial process.
In the previous case, the court referred to the public judgment as “privacy”; in this case, the court closed the door directly, not even to look at it.
From the “privacy protection theory” to the “non-public trial,” the logic goes by – hiding what should be seen by the public.
Today's trial judge Liu Seilun, the chief judge of the previous case "@record Liu Jiang" case, and the last time he appealed to the media for infringement of the rights of reputation, news, city youth network, record Liu Jiang's first trial judgment, all by Li Yuan unified review.
Whoever considers the public judgment of the court as his “personal privacy” – this is itself an irony of the open justice system.
Two trials will take place this afternoon.Lee Supper and Zhao Zhiqiang have written the script for the first season of this "sequence"
- wrongful judgment, hiding evidence, and the invention of the "privacy protection theory".
In the second season, Marine Judge Liu took the bar, and the opening was "no public trial".
From “public judgment is privacy” to “non-public trial is legal”, from “questioning the judgment of the secretary” to “foreclosure by the law enforcement” – logical self-discipline and proficiency.
The trial has not yet begun, and the struggle between law and lawlessness has already begun outside the court.
Shockingly, Phantom lawyer said, “By the fact that we are not accepting security inspections and we are not allowed to carry computers, the two Jiangsu lawyers, Jiangsu and I, are blocked outside the two Jiangsu district court in Chongqing, but they are absent from the trial.” “It’s dirty. Such a judge, such a court, can also expect it to “play the judicial ruling and punish the good function?” (author: Bing)
Source: Bing Cloud ID number: lzkj328
Edited by Shiva Shiva
Review of Pineapple
Filed to:lzkj328
Thanks for sharing!
Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…