Judge, is the final line of defense of justice and justice. This line of defense once lost, the building of social fairness and justice will shake down. Since the second half of last year, Chongqing City, formerly Northern District People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People's Court of the People of the District of Chongqing, the series of actions, let the public see how a judge "justice and justice
First, iron evidence like mountain, what some "violence" facts cannot be resisted.
The chain of evidence is so complete that no one can escape.
(1) In the 1999 rape case, the People's Procuratorate in Chongqing, Chongqing, the People's Procuratorate in Chongqing, Chongqing, the People's Procuratorate in Chongqing, Chongqing, the People's Procuratorate in Chongqing, Chongqing, the People's Procuratorate in Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing, Chongqing,
The victim Wang said why his boyfriend wanted to rape her, the next day to call the police, the public security personnel on his body inspection found red spots on the chest and neck;
Forensic medical certificate confirms that the detection of A-type human spots on the underwear of a certain person is the same as the blood type of a certain person, combined with the confession of a certain court, can confirm that a certain person has had sexual intercourse with a certain person;
Li crying from the room where she left, screaming what was a bandit, and telling her boyfriend why she attempted rape.
Can “voluntary sexual intercourse” also be accused of rape by three women? – Someone’s excuse exposes precisely the nature of his “sexual indulgence and violation of moral norms.”
In Chongqing, Jiangsu people's court (2010) Jiangsu French people's original civil judgment No. 3163 determined that Ho Mou became a couple with a female teacher in the case of having an active military spouse, donated a 460,000 yuan car, acting "in violation of the provisions of the marriage law, and does not comply with moral norms", and "should be condemned."
(iii) The female prosecutor's case. Ms. Ho and Ms. Wang, the female prosecutor's office of the fifth department of the Chongqing city prosecutor's office, had an unlawful sexual relationship for a long time and had one child. The reporting person submitted recording evidence to the Chongqing City Disciplinary Commission and the Municipal Prosecutor's Office, and Ms. Ho said to Ms. Wang in the recording, "You gave the old son a baby."
(4) Several witnesses accused of rape. The Northern District Court in the related divorce case, the questionnaire of several witnesses showed: a babysitter indicated that a certain "forced relationship occurred"; a certain company manager indicated that "as long as a woman did not let go", "a babysitter later said that a forced relationship occurred, said that threatened her, said that to kill her child"; a businessman Chen indicated that a certain force pulled, robbed the phone.
All of these facts point to the conclusion that a man has indulged in sexual conduct and violated the moral norms. This is the explanation of the Modern Chinese Dictionary of "disclaimer" for "disclaimer", which fully corresponds with Article 8 of the Civil Code "Do not violate public order and custom." Article 300 of the Criminal Code also contains "the crime of mass corruption"
- "disclaimer" is the official legal term written by lawmakers in the Criminal Code.
Li Super wrong judge: hiding evidence, not looking at facts
The accused submitted 22 evidence to the court, including the prosecutor's prosecution, court judgment, witness recording, audio recording, the court's own accusation of rape recording, all hidden by Li.
He acknowledged in the question after the verdict: "We did not determine what exactly was the relationship between some behavior and prostitution", "he did not have much to do with this case.""He acknowledged that some "had an out-of-marriage relationship, violating public order and good customs is definitely no problem," but insisted that "he has this situation, you can not call him 'sexuality.'"
The normative meaning of the legal term is not considered, the fact that the judgment came into force is not considered, the accusations of many witnesses are not considered
- what is the basis of the Li Supra judgment? he said in his own words: "Ask the secretary, or others", because the secretary and the "goat-eating masses" feel that "sexuality" is blasphemous.
Third, the first trial of the first trial of the media honor rights case was held on July 15, 2025.13 days after the trial ended, Li Superman notified the defendant: the plaintiff submitted a rejection application, approved by the dean Kang He, and the chief judge Wang Jing rejected.13 days after the trial ended, the rejection application was filed, and the procedure was illegal.Li Superman questioningly defended: "We are a three-person joint council."In the case of the procedure, no matter how many people the council is composed, the nature of the violation of the personnel composition will not change.
On November 3, 2025, in the face of the question of “unlawful judgment,” Li Ying swore to Heaven: “If I really did not judge according to the profession and conscience of the judge, Heaven would not be a problem!”10 days later he changed his mouth: “It is possible to judge wrong.””From “unlawful judgment” to “potential judgment wrong,” it took only 10 days.
Fourth, the loss of the bottom line: humiliating the party on July 8, 2026, Li Supra communicated by telephone with the party, the issue has not yet been said, he hastened to hang, at the same time breaking out a phrase "Ma'a Lagan." a judge wearing a shirt, in fact, the state blasphemed the normal question of the person should be
- this not only broke the bottom line of being a person, but also to shame the image of the judge professional group.
Article 12 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Judges shall be dismissed in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Judges, and the judge shall have "good political, business quality and moral conduct." Article 20 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Judges shall be dismissed in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges, judges
In the words of the general secretary, “To fairness, to fight evil, to play fairness, to punish justice, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil, to punish evil,
Article discussion
Verified members can discuss this report publicly and manage their own content.
Checking member sign-in status…