Wu Wei Yun was sentenced to four years in prison: from Ho Xian public security to the Angui political law system, who is responsible for the second imprisonment of a writer?

An Angel woman who has served for four years for online speech, was arrested again after just a few months, and now has been sentenced to four years in prison. The Defense Network on September 13 disclosed that since the media agent Wu Wei Yun was arrested again in May 2025, after being arrested, criticized, prosecuted and sentenced, in September 2026 has been transferred from the Guard of Seoul to the Provincial Women's Prison of Seoul. If this latest sentence is indeed again directed at its overseas network expression, then it is necessary to be questioned not only a grassroots case civil police, but a whole chain of responsibilities from the Ho Chi Minh County Public Security Bureau, Seoul Public Security Bureau to the Public Security Department of Seoul and the local party committee law system.

The first 3 years 10 months, the second 4 years: why one’s speech is constantly considered a “security risk”

The experience provided by the Defense Network shows that Wu Weihyun, born in 1970, Angu Khoshan, was an entertainment class writer, using network accounts such as "Happy White Cloud." After starting to use Twitter in 2018, her microblog, blog and Weihyun public number was blocked, and was administered for 11 days. On March 23, 2021, the Hoshan County Public Security Bureau detained her for suspicion of "provoking sexual assault"; On September 20, 2023, the Hoshan County Court sentenced her to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 10 months, with a term of imprisonment up to January 11, 2025.

During the last round of detention and sentencing, Wu was forced to take drugs, injected, beaten, and pressured to confess guilt.These serious accusations have not been publicly responded by the prison or the judicial authorities of Anhui, so that each allegation of abuse cannot be directly written as the fact that has been confirmed by the court; but it is precisely because of the personal safety of the detainees, the public security, prosecutor's supervision and the prison system has the responsibility to publicly explain: whether there are relevant medical records, injury records, surveillance videos, complaint complaints materials, and whether an investigation has been launched.

After January 2025, Wu Wuyun did not really regain her freedom. Defense Network said local police continued to ask about her internet access; on April 28 she was called to the post office to warn her and threaten her for her use of overseas websites. A month later, she was arrested again.

If a citizen is continuously monitored for expressing opinions, browsing overseas websites and publishing online texts after being sentenced, what does the so-called “punishment release” actually release?

Huang Hai-poo, director of Ho Xian County Public Security Bureau: The second arrest took place during your term

The public information of the Hoshan County government shows that Wang Haibo has been the deputy county chairman of Hoshan County since May 2024, the secretary of the party committee and director of the county public security bureau, and was also the deputy secretary of the county government and law committee.

More notable is the organizational structure announced by the Hoshan County Public Security Bureau itself.The Bureau clearly has a political security defense brigade, cybersecurity defense brigade and other institutions, and announced that the public security organs should implement the deployment of the county committee, the county government and the higher level of public security organs, "insist on and strengthen the party's absolute leadership in public security work".

This makes the case of Wu Weijun impossible to be interpreted as the accidental law enforcement choice of a civilian police. If the arrest, investigation and network speech proofing is done by the Ho Xian public security system, then Wang Haibo at least bears the leadership, law enforcement supervision and procedural responsibilities of the main responsibility of the public security organs . At present, the public material has not yet proved that Wang Haibo himself signed the arrest decision or personally ordered the investigation, so it can not be fictitious " Wang Haibo personally ordered"; but as the director, he can not claim to be unrelated to himself when the public security organs repeatedly expressed the object of compulsory measures.

Wu Zhe is in charge of political security defense: who turned online speech into a "political security" case?

The public public security leadership division of the Hoshan County government in 2026 showed that Wu Zhe was responsible for counter-terrorism, anti-corruption, political security defense, and exit management, and was in charge of the political security defense team.The official history shows that he has long served in the Hoshan County public security system, and has served as deputy secretary and deputy director of the Party Committee of the Public Security Bureau.

The organizational relationship is worth continuing to trace: Which police file the case of Wu Wuyun in 2025? what role the Political Security Defense Corps, the Internet Security Department and the jurisdictional department each take on? who makes the list of online evidence? who determines which posts constitute criminal facts? who signs the petition for detention, petition for arrest materials? if the Anhui side insists that this is a normal criminal case, these most basic procedural information should be disclosed, rather than just leaving a "provoking" or other criminal label.

Wang Xiaohua, Feng Shui, Guangzhou: When the second arrest occurred, the leadership of Xi'an and Anhui public security law could not disappear from the chain of responsibility.

When Wu Wei Yun was caught again in May 2025, the secretary and director of the Party Committee of the Xi'an Municipal Public Security Bureau was Wang Xi'an Municipal Public Security Bureau's own 2025 annual meeting material showed that Wang Xi'an represented the Party Committee of the Municipal Public Security Bureau to deploy public security work in the city, requiring public security organs at all levels to implement the deployment of the party committees of the Municipal Committee, the Municipal Government and the Provincial Public Security Department.

During the same period, the secretary of the Xi'an Municipal Committee was Partisan. The public information of the Xi'an Municipal Government in May 2025 confirmed that the Xi'an Municipal Committee was at the time presiding over the comprehensive work of the Municipal Committee. The Municipal Committee did not directly replace the public security organs to handle every criminal case, but the Chinese Communist system itself repeatedly emphasized the leadership of the Party in the work of political law. When the local public security incorporated a sentenced web writer into the criminal compulsory system again, the political leadership and supervision responsibility of the Municipal Committee can not only exist in recognition of "stable achievements" and suddenly disappear in the appearance of human rights violations disputes.

At the time of the capture in 2025, the head of the Public Security Administration of the province of Anhui was the Guardian State; on March 27, 2026,范付中 took over as the head of the Public Security Administration of the province of Anhui. In July 2026, the Public Security Bureau of the city of Xi'an was replaced by Wang Xi'an. The current secretary of the Xi'an Municipal Committee was Wang Zheng He. The staff will be replaced and will not automatically cut off the continuing responsibilities of the state organs: the former needs to answer how the capture and investigation occurred, and the current need to answer why the case continued to advance, and how the supervision and serving penalty rights were guaranteed after the verdict.

The chain of responsibility includes at least:

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

The responsibility here is not to fake every level of leadership as "personally handling cases", but to reject a long-standing responsibility escape technique of the CCP political law system: political security and "stability" require deployment from the top to the bottom, once the specific cases cause serious rights violations, responsibility is compressed to "grassroots law-based handling cases". power can be layered concentrated, responsibility can not layered evaporated.

The court and the prosecutor’s office must also answer: on what arguments is the four-year sentence based?

The case of Wu Weijun in 2021 was ultimately sentenced to 3 years and 10 months by the Hoshan County Court. For the latest four-year sentence after being arrested again in 2025, the information currently disclosed by the Defense Network has not yet provided the court sentences, case numbers, convictions, judges, prosecutors' charges and specific posts that have been identified as crimes.

If the judgment remains at the heart of online expression, it must be answered: which sentence causes specific, demonstrable social harm? how the so-called “fake information” is identified? who is the victim? what kind of public order is undermined? why the punishment must reach four years? if these questions cannot be answered in public judgments and evidence, then there is a major suspicion that the criminal law has been alienated as a tool of political expression and censorship.

Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution states that citizens are entitled to freedom of speech, publication, etc. The real question is not whether this article is on paper, but who guarantees this right when an Angel woman goes to detention, custody, court and prison repeatedly because of foreign networks.

Anguilla Women’s Prison is not a number, but a continuing human rights responsibility.

According to the Defense Network, Wu Wei Yoon had been transferred from Xi'an detention to the women's prison in the province of Anhui in September

1. Public information shows that the prison is located in the Long Fong Belt. The transfer of detention meant that the case went from the investigation, prosecution and trial stage to the stage of punishment enforcement, but previously Wu Wei Yoon allegations of forced drug use, injections and beating made his physical health and medical autonomy in the prison worthy of attention.

The Women’s Prison in Anguilla and the Prison Management System in Anguilla should ensure that they are free from beating, compulsory confession, retaliatory management and compulsory medication without proper medical procedures, and guarantee communication, encounters, complaints and necessary medical rights.

From "Happy Birthday" to the second four years: what is really judged is the attitude of the Anguilla political law system to freedom of speech

The most eye-catching points in Wu Weijun's case are the timeline itself: 2018 sealing and administrative detention; 2021 imprisonment; 2023 sentenced to 3 years and 10 months; January 2025 sentenced; April warned by the police; May arrested again; 2026 sentenced to 4 years and transferred to prison.

Focus on China's view that if the last four years of prison are still based on the peaceful expression of the network, then it is not "maintaining social order", but the state's compulsory machine's continued compression of speech space.Hoshan County Public Security Bureau, Xi'an City Public Security Bureau, Anaheim Province Public Security Department and the local party committee's legal system must disclose complete legal documents and evidence to answer what real danger is enough to let a 55-year-old woman lose four years of freedom again.

More importantly, every person who has power on this chain should leave a name to be held accountable. Wang Haibo can not only have the authority of the county public security director without supervision responsibility; Wang Xiaobi, the Guard State can not because he has left the office to let the internal cases disappear from the history; Qing Xiaobo can not only lead the political law work in the municipal committee documents, but in the appearance of political law enforcement disputes to be an observer; Wang Hong Hui,范付中, Yang storage can not simply classify the four-year sentence still in execution to the "historic cases."

When a regime must rely on the public security to monitor what a woman’s website, what text, and then rely on the criminal law to send her into the high wall, it shows not the power, but the fear of freedom of expression. The second four years of Wu Weijun, should become a public list of responsibilities: who filed cases, who collected evidence, who criticized, who prosecuted, who tried, who approved and supervised the execution of penalties, should be recorded in future laws and history.