The case of Qingdao was a big mistake. The two innocent elderly Su Jingfeng and Su Xiaoping have been wrongfully convicted of murder since 2017 and have been prosecuted for nine years and have been detained in custody. The indictment evidence is systematically false, and is simply astonished. The Shandong Provincial High Court twice revoked the original judgment and issued a re-trial, and is currently conducting the third first trial by the Qingdao Central Court.

*A lawyer who came to listen today with photos of our family*
Today, the prosecutors are presenting the record of the questioning of the accused Su Xiaoping, and the lawyers are analyzing it one by one. Whether Su Xiaoping's confession of guilt or innocence is justified, literally, false, false and false.
About the empty bricks in this case
The lawyer first commented on the sixth summary of the suspect’s interrogation, which is still filled with falsehoods and falsehoods, for example with empty bricks:
Cement brick location. in the note is recorded "I went to the northern side of the cottage, about a dozen meters from the shore to move a cement brick." and in the video, Suzhou Feng said the brick location is in the back (north) road, immediately to talk about the last question, when confessed "at the back of the house two or three meters" when interrupted by the investigators asked "the cement brick is?"
When the interrogation was conducted, the investigators determined that Su Xiaoping pointed out the empty bricks on the afternoon, in the woods 40 meters north of the cottage. This interrogation was a preparation for the afternoon indication and would never allow Su Xiaoping to say to move bricks two or three meters behind Su Xiaoping.
The source of the cement bricks. The note recorded "is the large piece of cement bricks we built the house." In the video Suzhou Feng said "maybe the house has fallen."This is speculative expression. But the note became a confirmed and accurate expression, this is a fake note.
The cement brick hole. the notebook recorded "there are three holes in the empty brick on one side". and the video Su Xiaoping said that "there are not three eyes in the empty brick?" this is a speculation, and it is not seen by the eye. the notebook is recorded as a confirmed, accurate description, which is also a fake notebook.
The note recorded, “I saw a whole piece of cement brick,” and objective evidence showed that there was a five-centimeter broken hole in the middle of the cement brick, just like the Apple logo was bitten and missing a part, which was obviously false.
Different investigators, falsifying different false facts.
In a commentary, the lawyer noted that each detective’s counterfeit has a specific counterfeit DNA.
The fifth and seventh interrogation recordings produced by the detective Zhou Xiaobo to Suzhou Feng were recorded with "a stick near the head of Suzhou after the Spring". First, it was fake, the video of Zhou Xiaobo never said this content. Secondly, the word near the back of the head was made by Zhou Xiaobo, and the other interrogation notes produced by the detective did not appear the word.
The fifth interrogatory note produced by Zhou Xiao to Suzhou Feng recorded that Suzhou Feng has to teach the two defendants; the tenth interrogation led by Li Vinjai became the two defendants' initiative to teach Suzhou Feng.
The interrogation led by the detective Mahatma Hailong, must let Suzhou Feng drive the iron boat forward with a wooden stick; the interrogation led by Li Vinjai, Suzhou Feng must drag the rope on the iron boat to move forward.
... ...
Before prosecutors appeal, investigators threatened Su Xiaoping not to duplicate confessions
Prosecutor Zhu Jian presented Liu Lanchi's interrogation record made by Liu Yan County Prosecutor's Office to Suzhou Feng on December 22, 2017.
Su Xiaoping asked Zhu Jian: Did the Attorney General of Zhang Nam County investigate me?
Su Xiaoping immediately said: On December 21, 2017, Li Wen Jiang tried me alone, with neither a video nor a notebook. he threatened me to say, "What you say in the public security phase, to the prosecutor's office, if you dare to say nonsense, you will be called back to the public security to kill you ".
At that time my bracelet was gone, and he also threatened me to say, "I wear the bracelet that they have prepared for me, I can't wash my ass by myself, but I have to help others.
The lawyer then pointed out that Zhu Jian was lying again, and the lawyer repeated several times in court that Liu Ranchi was not a staff prosecutor in 2017, but an assistant prosecutor.
Prosecutor Zhu Zhi Jin prosecutor submitted 15 notes at a time and refused to read them.
During the trial, Zhu Jiang used Suzhou Feng's innocence excuse to prove that the contents of the excuse were not true.But she did not read the record, nor explain the reasons, only claimed that it could not be established according to law.
The lawyer replied: Where are the 15 justifications of Su Xiaoping not true, and why can't they be established according to law?
The first prosecutor for nine years in charge of the case, Zhu Sheng-jen, has been silent about this. for nine years, she has not even said the facts of the case, but dares to deny Suzhou's justification.
The lawyer subsequently made a strong protest against Zhu Jian's not reading the note, and the Chamber of Representatives did not play the defensive video, but Zhu Jian and the Chamber of Representatives did not move.
“Curiously condemned, retaliated!” detectives in turn humiliated Su Xiaoping
The lawyer submitted a quotation on Suzhou's third justification record during the second first trial.
The lawyer pointed out that by viewing the video of the interrogation, investigators Zhang Liqi and Cao Xin-jee did not come to question the facts of the case at all, but intentionally angered Suzhou Feng, destroying his innocent defense will. This means, followed by the means of taking care of life to fight Suzhou Feng, he said to Suzhou Feng "your wife is dead, your brother has cancer to die soon, your three children are not well ... all because of you."
* by
* The investigator's remarks on the attack on Suzhou Peak are
Investigators have spoken about the attack on Suzhou.
Three feet above God.
“Condemned and Rewarded”
“The face can say anything.”
“Anyone will scream.”
“Don’t sleep, don’t make that dream.”
... ...
They insulted and demeaned Suzhou, and their voices gradually increased, and could even be said to be screaming. The poor Suzhou was excused, but was interrupted once and again and suppressed by the voice.
Since the investigators confirmed that Su Xiaoping was the murderer, the interrogation should end, rather than continue to persuade.
The lawyer has not yet issued a full statement on the record, and the time has come until 5:30 p.m., and the Court has announced the suspension of the trial. The trial will continue tomorrow, and the lawyer will continue to reveal the infringements of the investigators.
The place of the trial is the sixth trial court of the Hanoi District Court. At present, there is no need to make an appointment in the case, and you can listen with your identity card. Please arrive in advance at the trial time: before 9 p.m. and before 14 p.m.
Interested friends, according to their time can come to observe the situation of the rule of law, together urge the court to fairly process this case.Our family will also try their best to listen to the reception and guidance work.
Our family name and phone number ↓ Come and listen to friends can contact us
The granddaughter of Suzhou Cellar by phone 15092970157
Suzhou's second daughter Suzhou's second daughter, 18705498575
Sumin's son Sumin's son 15762030805
Su Xiaoping's greatest daughter Su Xiaoping Phone 13625396371
Su Xiaoping's second daughter Su Xiaoping Phone 15318572055

Original source
- Original title
- 这是什么讯问?侦查人员轮番羞辱苏晓峰|临沂二苏案第38日
- Original author
- 苏秀芹、苏秀艳
- Source account / outlet
- 微信公众号“无辜的老人”
- Originally published
- 2026-09-15 20:55
- Content treatment
- Republished
- Original article
- View original ↗
- Published by China Focus
- 聚焦中国

文章讨论
已验证会员可围绕报道公开交流,并自行管理自己的内容。
正在检查会员登录状态…