The Zheng Tai Yang was seized, and Meng reported the "White Glove" of Liu's estate to Chief Yang Su Tae-hyung.

The Secretary of the City Council of Hebei Xin Tai City was strung up and once again put the Secretary of the Provincial Council of Xie-xiang City, Mon Kyeong Peng, in public view, in a letter of a well-known report that had raised public opinion in March this year.

The source alleges that Mongwenpeng is suspected of having obtained hundreds of millions of yuan through three “white gloves” and that it involved projects, debt in the city, improper relations between men and women, children outside marriage and two cases of irregular death. The report has been made public for more than seven months, and Meng Kyeong Peng is still in the official business, and the status of its admissibility and outcome has not been publicly explained accordingly.

At the same time, in Jiangsu Tae-hying, former Municipal Council Standing Committee, Secretary of Political and Legal Law, and currently Director of the Municipal People ' s Congress, Liu Hui, also continued to be reported on suspicion of harbouring the local black businessman Wu Yun, the case involving the multimillion dollar ship competition and the transmission of property benefits from Xinjiang.

The three local officials are divided into different cases, but the issues are concentrated on one critical point: Who investigates the authorities, who protects the whistleblowers and who supervises the investigative bodies when corruption reports touch the main leadership of the local party committees, the political and judicial organs and officials in charge of economic resources?

♪ The Yang suddenly fell and the report of Meng Kyeong Peng's real name was again under review ♪

On 2 November, at 10.20 a.m., the Central Disciplinary Commission ' s National Monitoring Board website released information that Yang, the Secretary of the Hebei Provincial Council of Chang Tai City, was under disciplinary review and inspection by the Hebei Provincial Disciplinary Commission, on suspicion of serious disciplinary violations.

Yang was born in January 1974 and served long in Hebei, where he was a deputy mayor and director of the health and health committee of Hebei Province and as secretary of the city of Hebei in 2023.

Under Yang, the Secretary of the Pyi Tawy County Commission, Meng Kyeong Peng, is the main head of the district party committee under his leadership.

On 20 February 2025, Yang went to Pyxy County to study the development of the industrial cluster of bearings, and Meng Kyeong Peng participated in and made comments on the activities. The study was publicly covered by local media in the Chinese channel.

More than a year later, Yang was under investigation for serious disciplinary offences. The major corruption leads of Mong-Peng, who served under his leadership and was publicly reported in his name, have once again become a matter for investigation.

On 20 March 2026, the Microblogging account “Peer-Stealing the Wind” published a report against Mon Kyeong Peng. The content was then disseminated online, directly to the District Secretary, who is also Deputy Director of the Standing Committee of the Chang Tai Municipal People ' s Congress, on suspicion of serious economic corruption and personal disciplinary offences.

The report alleges that Meng-Peng, through three businessmen or profit-bearers, used his position to influence commercial projects and accumulate huge wealth, which amounted to hundreds of millions of yuan, and that some of the materials that were circulated pointed to the scale of interests of nearly one billion yuan.

The report also covered five women, two children outside marriage, and the irregular death of a woman and her husband. The materials link these deaths to Mongyeong Peng ' s personal relations and power influence.

These reports are far more than the usual question of the way in which the leadership is conducted. Project, financial arrangements, hidden assets and death of persons, involving, respectively, job offences, asset tracing and citizen ' s safety, shall be subject to the corresponding investigation procedures.

However, since the report was made public, the public has seen mainly the continued performance of the functions of Mongwan.

On 23 April, Meng-Peng participated in research activities at Hebei University of Economics and Trade to Pi West County, as Deputy Director of the Standing Committee of the Chang Tai Municipal People ' s Congress and as Secretary of the Pil-O County.

On 9 September, Meng Kyeong Peng again led a delegation to Hebei University of Economics and Trade to discuss the reform of the PET Group, science and technology finance, and the axial industries.

On 12 October, the Hebei Great Wall Network reported on industrial development in the West Axis, still citing Meng-Peng as the county secretary.

This indicates that seven months after the fact-finding report was made public, Meng Kyeong Peng continues to hold important leadership positions. The Hebei Provincial Disciplinary Commission and the Supervisory Board should inform the public whether the report has been received, whether the relevant project, funds and information on the death of the person has been investigated and who is responsible for overseeing the investigation process.

In particular, the allegations concerning construction, urban investment financing and the “white gloves” proxy cannot be confined to questioning the cadres and reviewing the internal statements. Information on the equity of enterprises, land transactions, tenders for works, financing guarantees, flow of funds and actual beneficiaries should be obtained to track where the huge profits reported are going.

Two deaths and the situation of the reporting person, Chen Yuanwon

In addition to the huge economic benefits, the two irregular deaths mentioned in the report and the follow-up to the report by the real source, Chen Yuanwon, were of the greatest concern.

The source alleges that a woman and her husband who had a private relationship with Meng Kyeong Peng died in succession, and that the incident involved a power influence and private interest of local officials.

The clues concerning death should be a priority for the public security and inspection bodies. The time and place of death, the record of the investigation, the examination of the remains, the testimony of the persons concerned and the presence of public officials to intervene in the handling of the case require legal verification.

In the case of the real source, Chen Yuanwon, another source of interest to those who have followed the matter on a continuing basis provides another clue worth following.

According to the sources, after the incident was made public, they made several calls to Chen Yuanwon to call the contact number left behind. The first was answered on behalf of the person, then unaccepted, and the last telephone call was shown to be off the line.

Changes in telephone contact have made the situation of whistleblowers part of public concern.

In the case of a person who has publicly accused the County Secretary of corruption of being a known informant of a large amount, the disciplinary inspection body has the duty to protect his personal security and the right to report, in accordance with the law, against any form of threat, retaliation and attack.

The ability of Chen Yuanwon to communicate with the outside world normally, the fact that the reporting material is subject to the legal procedure and the fact that there are any pressure to withdraw the complaint should be explained through a legal investigation.

In particular, when reports are made that the main head of the local party committee, the investigation should not be led by a peer who may have a conflict of interest. The supervisory and supervisory body shall directly monitor and ensure the safety of the evidence reported and the persons concerned.

♪ Jiang Su Liu Hui was reported to have sheltered Wu Yun and billions of dollars in the ship-raiding case ♪

In response to a well-known report from Hebei Occidental, Jiangsu Tae-hing has been the subject of a major criminal case for nearly a decade, which has also raised the issue of local political and legal officials being reported as harbouring black traders.

The investigation report published on 31 October by Focus China revealed the reported private economic interests of former Tae-hyun City Council Standing Committee, Secretary of Political and Law Commission Liu Fai, and the local businessman U Yun, as well as the huge financial trail involved in the Blue Sea 300 case in 2017.

In March 2017, there was an organized arms seizure by the Jiangsu Port China Shipping Company Limited in the Rainbow Bridge area of Tae-hing City.

The case records that the Blue Sea 300 has entered the Court's property preservation area, with a declared value of $107.6 million.

On 28 and 29 March, U Yun and others involved in the organization of the operation, including Cao Rue-Le, Shenzhen, Wang Lei and Liu Xin. More than 20 people arrived in multiple vehicles at the shipyard, carrying tools such as machetes, cutting equipment, controlling the gatekeepers and the staff on the ground and attempting to force the towing of the ship.

The tipping line revealed that Wu Yun had collected $3 million prior to the operation and a further $2 million subsequently, for a total of $5 million.

The organization of the personnel, preparation of tools, organization of vehicles and advance payment of funds for the operation reflect a systematic and violent competition for specific property.

However, the case was ultimately dealt with mainly on the basis of the offence of sedition.

On 8 December 2017, the Thaksin City People ' s Court sentenced Wu Yun to one year and four months ' imprisonment. On 8 February 2018, the Thai Intermediate People ' s Court rejected the appeal and upheld the sentence.

More worth pursuing is the funding arrangements that have been made after the case has occurred.

The report received by Focus China alleges that an additional $12 million was used since the incident to arbitrate political and legal relations between the public security, the prosecutor ' s office, the courts and others, in an attempt to influence the characterization of the case, the criminal penalties and the accountability of the persons involved.

One armed operation involving more than 20 people, billions of dollars of property and 5 million yuan in compensation for the organization, why is it eventually dealt with on such charges and sentences? Who are the 12 million dollars suspected of being used in the operation of judicial relations?

These cases, which already have a specific amount, time and reporting lines for the persons involved, are to be investigated by the Monitoring Board of the Jiangsu Provincial Disciplinary Commission, the Public Prosecution Service and the relevant judicial oversight authorities.

The investigative focus should include the case-hosting staff, the receipt of funds, the process of characterization of the case, changes in criminal coercive measures and the question of whether public officials are receiving the benefit and interfering in the administration of justice in violation of the law.

♪ From the top of the leadership to the business umbrella ♪

Liu Fai's career has made the political asylum report in the Wu Yun case of special public interest.

According to the public information provided by the Thaksin City Government, on 24 July 2020, then-Commissioner and Secretary of the Political and Legal Commission Liu Fai participated in and spoke at the expanded meeting of the City-wide leadership group for the fight against corruption.

In September of the same year, Liu Fai accompanied the head of the Zooxin Office in Jiangsu province in the investigation of local efforts to combat corruption.

In other words, Liu Fai has been in the leadership of the Thai regime during the ongoing dispute over the Wu Yun case and the local campaign to combat corruption.

The source alleges that U Yun has maintained close and long-standing personal relations with Liu Fian and that U Yun has arranged and incurred the costs of housing and living expenses of several women in Nanjing for Liu Fian. There are also other reported leads on the existence of private relations between the two parties.

The key question involved was whether traders could afford to pay for private official expenditure for the long term in exchange for political and legal care and protection of interests.

The cases reported by Wu Yun concerning gambling, loan sharks, drug-related, violent debt collection and other black-tangling leads must be investigated, investigated, detained, remanded in custody and followed up, and the local leadership has not intervened properly.

A senior political and legal officer who is responsible for the fight against corruption has been reported to have financial interests with black traders, and this is a functional relationship and conflict of interest that should be pursued as a priority.

The Jiangsu Provincial Disciplinary Commission and the Supervisory Board shall investigate whether Liu Yun ' s financial transactions with him during his tenure, private expenditures, the case coordination records and whether the relevant political and legal officials have been improperly instructed.

Xinjiang Real Estate Benefit Report, Money Green Forest is used as a "white glove"

Liu Fai also reported on the recruitment of money and real estate development activities during the period of Xinjiang's assistance.

On 25 September 2010, the Thai City Government issued a document establishing a working group for the Zhusu district of Xinjiang State of Support to its Counterpart Party, at which time Liu Fai, Vice-President of the city of Tae Xing, was appointed as Deputy Chairman.

Liu Fai has since served as the Standing Committee and Deputy District Chief of the Zhao Su District Commission, and has been involved in the recruitment of business, industrial projects and infrastructure development.

The documents of the Zhusu District Government for 2013 show that Liu Fian has been involved in work related to industrial recruitment, building of parks, and public economic matters such as land acquisition, road support and investment financing.

The report states that the real estate business operated by the Green Forest, a Thai real estate businessman, in Xinjiang may have assumed the role of holding and operating real estate economic benefits for Liu Fai.

The report also addresses the increase in the price of housing for some real estate projects from approximately $800 to over $4,000 per square metre, as well as the issue of holding assets by nominal investors, allocating the profits of the project and transferring funds.

The experience of the Green Forest in Xinjiang real estate industry is being tracked by locally available and publicly available information. In the 2021 list of individuals who are model individuals for the progress of national unity in Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Chan Greenwood is publicly known as the Secretary and Chairman of the Party Branch of the Residency Real Estate Development Corporation of Altai.

In August 2024, the Green Forest donated $500,000 to the Tachin City Education Fund as head of the Promising Real Estate Development Limited in Brzin District. The records of the activities published by the Tachin City Education Department show that Liu Fai, then Deputy Secretary of the Taehing City Council and Minister of General War, attended the donation ceremony.

This multi-year political and commercial link provides a clear line of people and business leads for further investigation of the economic interests of both sides.

The inspection and inspection body shall follow up on the original financing, change of interest, acquisition of land, project development, asset transactions and distribution of final proceeds of the real estate enterprise concerned and verify whether Liu Fai and his associates have obtained undue economic benefits through other persons.

The investment projects involved are located in different regions of Xinjiang, and there is a greater need to identify the interest arrangements referred to in the report through real financial transactions and business control relationships.

Keeps a report, Liu Fai still has public activities as the Chief Executive

Liu Fai has since served as Deputy Secretary of the Taehing City Council and, in 2026, as Director of the Standing Committee of the Taihing City People ' s Congress.

Just on 30 October, he attended a symposium of Thai-Singe entrepreneurs to encourage outside entrepreneurs to bring their projects, funds and resources home.

On 1 November, the report on entrepreneurial activities published by the Thaksin municipality once again revealed that Liu Fai participated in public service as Director of the Standing Committee of the People ' s Congress.

From the reported cases of political asylum, the transfer of judicial interests to the hidden assets of Xinjiang real estate, Liu Fai ' s job readjustment did not render these historical reports traceable.

In particular, he currently holds the post of Director of the Standing Committee of the People ' s Congress, which has the statutory responsibility of supervising the work of the Government, the Ombudsman, the courts and the Public Prosecutor ' s Office.

When the person concerned is in a position of responsibility, the individual ' s reporting is more likely to be investigated by a competent superior body and to protect the investigation process from interference by local personnel and interests.

The authorities cannot avoid following up on criminal leads on alleged offences in the workplace on the grounds that the person has been reassigned, that the case has been decided or that part of the matter has been settled for a long time.

Officials are not found to be successful in fighting corruption, so public oversight prevents asylum of power

Yang was seized, Meng Kyeong Peng continued to serve, and Liu Fai was still the director of the Standing Committee of the Tai Xing City People's Congress.

These incidents, which vary from one case to another, reveal common issues of heightened vigilance in local power monitoring.

On the one hand, the Communist Party has long claimed that the fight against corruption and the fight against corruption have yielded significant results and has constantly called for the integrity of cadres in politics and for the strict enforcement of the law.

On the other hand, when the true names of the reports concern the economic relations between the local party leaders, political and judicial leaders and businessmen, it is difficult for the public to obtain timely and complete public information on the status of the reports received, the responsibility for investigation, the tracing of funds and the processing of personnel.

This lack of transparency has led to a long-term systemic conflict of interest in party oversight.

Under the current political system, local party committees have the executive and major decision-making power, and political and legal bodies are also led by parties. Complaints involving key local officials are often at a clear disadvantage in the absence of independent press oversight, public property declarations, effective judicial checks and balances and external mechanisms that can truly hold them accountable.

When those in power can influence investigators, cadres, case handling and public opinion dissemination, the fight against corruption can easily become an internal process of power to determine the subject of an investigation and power to control the public sphere of information.

This institutional weakness requires continued press oversight and public criticism.

• In the event of a report from Meng Kyeong Peng in Hebei, it is necessary to follow up on the huge economic benefits, projects, debts, deaths of persons reported and to protect the legitimate rights of Chen Yuanwon.
• For the reports of Jiang Su Liuhui, the 5 million yuan in Wu Yun compensation, the 12 million yuan in suspected judicial bribery funds and the alleged private economic interests between Liu Hui and Wu Yun and the Green Forest.
• In the case of Yang Yang ' s review, the Hebei Provincial Disciplinary Commission and the Supervisory Board shall, while conducting the case in accordance with the law, disclose the facts of responsibility involved in the investigation of the offence of official misconduct and prevent the outcome from remaining in the general political language.

More importantly, independent media investigations and citizens ' right to report under the law should be guaranteed, so that the oversight of public power can be continued without waiting for an official to be taken away by the Superior Council before the old case can be brought back to its attention.

A municipal secretary is a dead man and can open a case of corruption; Only through continuous, open and independent monitoring of power can more cases of corruption be prevented from being concealed by internal relationships.

China ' s society is accountable not only to individual officials, but also to the power to operate mechanisms that perpetuate corruption and make it difficult for major reports to obtain a public response.

China will continue to follow up on developments in the Yang Gang case, the findings of the investigation reported by Meng Kyeong Peng, the latest developments in Chen Yuanwon and the reporting leads on Liu Hui, Wu Yun and Chan Greenwood, and to promote continuous monitoring of the persons concerned and the public authorities.

Significant reports cannot be ignored by silence in the public arena, and those in power cannot rely on their positions and political relations to avoid legal accountability.