Why is the “false judge” in Hebei Temple still “focused” by the courts?

The world is big, nothing but wonders.

The names, ages, identities, experiences and qualifications of a “judge” cadre of the People's Court of Tatao County, located in the city hall of Hebei Province, are false. Following complaints, the relevant authorities verified that the identity information of the person who had been identified as a substitute had been cancelled by the public security organs and that the judge had been dismissed. It is, however, incomprehensible that the “false judge” still continues to work in the courts, receives a special political financial security wage and is even being “trained” by the courts as a “good cadre”.

The original accused in the same case received two different judgements, which led to the false judge, Ko Joon-Ling

As early as 2006, Wang Satellite, a then media journalist, discovered that the Tsaow County People ' s Court had delivered four judgements with very different results in two cases.

Of these, two judges appeared in the same two judgements, Judgement No. 235 (2001) of the National Court of First Instance, and one named Ko Joon-Ling and the other signed (the same person was not found on the “three-year-old” roster of the staff of the Public Court of Tattoo).

In response, it was reported that the two judges in the judgement were actually the same person who had been impersonating them.

Moreover, in 2004, the Tribunal of Tsa Tao County issued judgement 371 of the initial title of the Japanese people (2004) to the plaintiff, which was successful by the plaintiff, while the same judgement in the case of the defendant, Cao Ming, was successful by the defendant.

On 9 January 2006, Wang Satellite arrived at the village of Goto Pagore, Weidong Town, Quantuan, Zhengzhou, to interview and verify the family, based on the leads provided by the crowd.

Ko Guangcheng said: “My eldest daughter, Ko Joon-Lin, was born on 1 May 1974 and graduated from the high school in Tutao County, where she did not pass the exam several times in the year. The list says it's three points short of a one-point cut."

That afternoon, Wang satellite drove to the middle school of the Qingqing City Smoke Shop in Shandong Province, which is only one river, and found Go Joon-Ling herself, who had been teaching here for many years.

After being confirmed by Go Joon-Ling herself that he did not know “Zhou Zhou”, he failed to take his high school exam twice and then failed to find his family's account in the police station, where he could not take the examination and take employment with Yang Zhou, without the means to do so.

The Wang Satellite Survey found that a woman, born in 1979, was 13 years old and was in the first grade of junior high school when she was born as Ko Joon-Ling in

1. And all the evidence points to the judge of the court of poture, Ko Joon-Ling, who is really called "Zhou Zhou".

The information of the above-mentioned investigation, which was disclosed on the Internet by Wang Satellite through “Blog China”, did not attract the attention of the relevant authorities and courts in the Quantuan county.

Since then, several people have been reporting numerous cases of forgery committed by the judges of the Court of Public Prosecutions of the Ko Joon-Lin, who were appointed by the Zhou's impostor.

One of the complaints submitted stated that on 29 November 2017, in a dispute over the validity of the contract, Ko Joon-Lin had prepared and printed the forged name of Li Xiaohua, Wang One-min and the date of the month, the case was opened and closed that day, the case filed for fraud (2017), the case No. 0433, the full file of the financial security case No. 154, and the property of the client, Li, was seized and the property of the owner, Li and Zhui Hua, valued at $6.7 million.

In the subsequent investigation, members of the Tatao court group, Lu, Han, Li, Min and others, in their " Check-in Report " only reported the false behaviour of Ko Joon-Lin and criticized this tyrannical treatment. The case of Go Joon-Ling's impersonation of a judge was considered outside the Court's jurisdiction.

As a result, Zhao Hua contested that he was still prosecuting Go Joon-Ling and others until he was legally dismissed from public office.

On 20 June 2018, Wang, a senior officer of the Zhuang Tao County Health Service, submitted a complaint to the District Disciplinary Commission Supervisory Board, reflecting the presence of someone who had been imposted to take up her responsibilities as Go Joon-Lin ' s substitute for school and work.

The complaint submitted that the real Go Joon-Lin graduated from the High School and Secondary School in Tutao County, took the post of the University and High School in 1993, took the Hebei Judicial School and was replaced by the village of Nan Lin, the village of Wei Sang-chek, in Zhou, in Zhou, and lost his promotion and his personal account records. Since then, Zhou has graduated from Hebei Judicial School, impersonating Ko Joon-Lin, and has been promoted to the position of judge, vice-president of the town court and president of the court in charge of the case.

However, in July 2018, she was the only deputy judge in the Tsuo Tao County Court who was recommended by the court team as a province-wide judge and was advertised for inclusion in the post-judges ' order in August of that year.

The fake judge, Go Joon-Ling, was found guilty of mishandling and was promoted to the post.

In October 2018, the Quantuan District Disciplinary Commission found that Ko Joon-Ling was replaced by a fake name on Zhou.

On 4 December 2018, the Tutao County Court of Tutao gave its " Report on the trial of the Ko Joon Ling disciplinary offences of the People ' s Court of Tutao County ".

The report states that the main infractions of Ko Joon-Ling (Zhou) are that the official curriculum vitae of Ko Jun-Ling was the conclusion of primary school in Ta-Cheng from September 1985 to July 1990; Secondary school attendance at the Temple High School (now the First High School of the Province of Tat) was September 1990-July

1. The real name of Ko Joon-Ling's father is Zhou Zhou Zhou Zhou, and the mother is Li Zing. This is inconsistent with the contents of the register of high school graduates in the Ko Joon-Ling file, the register of graduates of the Hebei Judicial School and the curriculum vitae of the cadres. In 1993, Ko Joon-Ling graduated from junior high school and was enrolled at Hebei Judicial School (the Professional College of Judicial Police of Hebei).

The report gives the opinion that it was found that Ko Joon-Lin, as a staff member of the Zhoutao county people ' s court, had not been consistent with the previous study history of the Habei Judicial School (the Professional College of Judicial Police of Hebei), the parents ' names and the real situation; In 1993, Ko Joon-Ling graduated from junior high school and was admitted to Hebei Judicial School (the Professional College of Judicial Police of Hebei) as a disciplinary offence.

In accordance with article 9 of the Rules for the Treatment of the Falsification of Personnel Records of Personnel (Preliminary) and article 76 of the Regulations on the Disposition of Staff of People ' s Courts, it is recommended that Go Joon-sing be given disciplinary action.

On 4 December 2018, the President of the Court of Tutao County, in a study, decided to give Ko Joon-Ling a disciplinary order.

As a result of the harshness of the punishment, Ko Joon-Ling was appointed President of the Tribunal of the Tsunta County Court during the time of the punishment.

The case of Ko Joon-Lin, who had previously been used as a fraud, had been dealt with in a report of the investigation by the court of Tokaku Tao, where he had found himself incompetent.

In fact, the people ' s courts have no autonomous powers of investigation, adjudication, qualification and independent prosecution, in accordance with the law, of the officials responsible for the fraud of State organs, identity documents, crimes such as identity documents, crimes such as impersonation and misconduct in the recruitment of public officials. Thus, the Court ' s trial report of December 2018, the disciplinary decision and the subsequent appointment of the President of the Court all involved issues such as ultra vires, procedural irregularities, errors in the application of the rules, and the imposition of a penalty of malformation, all of which have no legal effect and should be corrected and full accountability initiated in accordance with the law.

After Ko Joon-Ling's graduation, the false judge is still the main target?

The information that was so broken by the “upgradation” of ordinary judges to the rank of President and a sitting judge of the Court of Justice, after being certified by the Disciplinary Commission and certified by the District Court of Tzu Ta, has suddenly subverted the public view.

In June 2020, the complainant, Wang Nieng, again filed a complaint with the Supervisory Board of the Qindian District Council and the Inspector-General ' s Team of the Hebei Provincial Council in the case of the false judge, Ko Joon-Lin.

In 2021, during the reorganization of the National Political and Legal Service, former Judge Wang Jin Ling of Quan County, also reported to the Central Supervisory Group and others about the fraudulent use of her status as Ko Joon-Ling.

The incident of Go Joon-Ling's impersonation has since again drawn the attention of the higher authorities.

In June 2022, the Hebei Provincial Commission ' s Inspectorate ordered the public to cancel the fraudulent name of Ko Joon-Ling ' s academic background and the Public Security Bureau of Zheng Tao County to revoke her identity and restore her identity to her original identity.

In August 2022, upon instructions from the City of Wu, Ko Joon-Ling was withdrawn from the post of judge in the same year, and the personnel files were all falsely recorded and downgraded to four levels of assistant judge.

On 17 August 2022, the City Council instructed the Tattoo Court to again demote Zhou Zhou (when the assumed status of Ko Joon-Ling was revoked) to the same level as the fourth level assistant judge, and to change the salary to the second level of five judges, and to adjust the salary to the second level of 22, step four, and to the same level of the job file. The Court did not render an opinion, as the complainant ' s request to dismiss Ko Joon-Ling (Zhou) from public office was not a court duty.

As the Court Archives are under the management of the Office, on 14 November 2022, at the direction of the City Discipline Board, the county court of Tatsu re-aligned the position of Ko Joon-Ling (Zhou) from the Archives to the Library.

In 2023, the Zhuang Tao County Council established the Wang Jin Ling Case Course.

On 29 July of the same year, at the Tsuo-Tao People's Service Centre, the then Secretary-General of the Disciplinary Commission, Zhou Jie, informed Wang Jin Ling that the complaint against Go Joon-Ling was investigated by the Municipal Disciplinary Committee, but that the District Disciplinary Committee, including the Council itself, was not in a position to take charge of the matter.

In May 2026, Wang Kim Ling learned from various sources that Ko Joon-Ling (Zhou Zhou) was still on duty after having been reported on several occasions and that he had been assigned by the courts as a high-quality person to train his village cadres.

It should be noted that, in August 2022, in accordance with the instructions of the Monitoring Committee, the Public Security Department of Zheng Tao County cancelled the false account of “Gou Joon-Ling”, seized his resident identity card and issued a real civil status and residence card for “week-by-week”.

It is surprising, however, that the register of court staff, the mailing list, the identity card used, the salary card, the social security card and the fake judge, Ko Joon-Ling, are still still still the same and only if the false judge, Ko Joon-Ling, is present, will they be guaranteed special financial security and salary for the central administration.

According to the relevant legal persons, this means that the impostor Zhou Zhou Zhou continues to take all the treatment of financial staff under the false identity of “Gou Joon-Ling”, whose actions are suspected of constituting a fraud offence, and who is liable under the law to recover the money he has obtained and to hold him criminally responsible.

View: Legal treatment of the impersonating judge

In the case of Ko Joon-Ling, who was fraudulently used as a “false judge” in Zhou, the legal profession has made the following assessment of the four levels of criminal accountability, public service disposition, judicial discipline, and the selection of candidates for the use of persons for compliance, in conjunction with existing legal acts such as the Criminal Law Amendment (xi) Act on the Administration of Public Officials and the Law on the Administration of Justice, the Administration of the Mistake of the Falsification of Personnel Records of Officials:

From the criminal legal level: In the case of the alleged impostor, the criminal liability is established by law.

(a) The offence of embezzlement, fraudulent substitution of another person for admission to higher education, admission to public office and admission to public service, in accordance with article 280 bis of the Criminal Code (indictment of impostor), constitutes a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment for up to three years, detention or regulation and a fine; The same offence is punishable by a combination of the offences committed by State agents and also suspected of forgery of official documents, documents and abuse of authority of State organs.

. ii. Regulations on the disposition of public service: file is false and fraudulently admitted to office, and the minimum legal basis for dismissal from public service.

Article 32 of the Public Service Administration Act explicitly provides for falsely obtained academic qualifications, preparation, position, status and treatment, and dismissal in serious cases; The uniform criteria for handling the same types of public officials in the various localities are: fraudulently taking public office by means of identity, academic qualifications and the principle of dismissal.

In many cases of impersonation of office in Shandong, all replacements were dismissed and transferred to justice.

For example, Chen Chun Su, Shandong Chong County, located in the only river separate from the Taao Court in Hebei Province, was replaced by Chen Yu-Ping, who sentenced a total of 29 persons to prison, the best case to be dealt with publicly and in all respects.

In this case, the Qhou impostor, the entire school, domicile and personnel file, is false. The full eligibility for the post is based on fraud and is not a minor disciplinary offence, but is only given a record, downgrade or transfer, and the penalty is clearly aberration, contrary to the current administrative disposition legislation and the scale of the disposal of the same cases.

The Judges Act provides that judges must submit genuine qualifications, identification materials for their duties and that if they obtain a judge ' s post, and their qualifications are fraudulently obtained, they shall be disqualified and removed from the bench; The judge or President of the Court who obtained the post in his or her name shall have no legal effect from the beginning and shall be dismissed or dismissed from office by law.

* Management from the judiciary: the issuers continue to be on duty and are trained as good cadres against the mandatory requirements of the judiciary.

The courts, as judicial organs, are the public authorities that uphold the rights to identity, honour, personality and education. Judges themselves enter their posts by false representation, seriously undermining the credibility of the judiciary and failing to meet the political criteria and entry thresholds for the use of individuals in the exercise of their profession by the law enforcement police.

The selection of persons who have been identified as having forged their qualifications and whose domicile has been deregistered as a cadre of village officials and who have been removed from their official status as a cadre has been made in contravention of the selection and appointment of the cadres, the verification system of the archives and the qualification requirements for the selection of village cadres.

iv. From the closed circle of accountability: not just replacements, but the same year ' s assistance in the falsification of the relevant liability.

The multiple levels of review of admissions to the school, the school of graduation, the school of admission and the court after graduation, which are capable of impersonating the family, the student registration, the postal service, the public security, the public security, the police and the court record-keeping staff, are bound to be held accountable for the misconduct of their duties and for the irregularities in the conduct of the case, in accordance with the practice of the impostor, for assisting in the year in the handling of the case.

After many reports, the person concerned is recommended for appointment as judge and president, and is subsequently only demoted, highlighting the lack of staff and the failure of some local units to select candidates, supervise the staff, and correct the problems. The disciplinary and inspection bodies may, in accordance with the law, initiate a supervisory review and review of the cases of maladministration and irregular retention.

We will follow up on the case of “false judges” Ko Joon-Ling.

Introduction by Zhang Xiaoqiao, former journalist of the China Business Times, and director of the Guangdong Press Station, and now the Managing Director and editor of the Macao Global News.

Review of prior periods

Two judges in Heilongjiang were in the dark, 250 million dollars worth of work were seized and were charged with the loss of life.

The evidence was disclosed by the official business collusion: the Deputy Director of Public Security joined the prosecutor to release the lawyer to enter the “zero dollar” equity contract signed by the prison

The president of the court, brother's firm, has a bad business, no real case, no direct judgment.

Who was the deputy director of the police station who beat up the journalist?

The corruption of the police chief, the "Red House" regular, and the trader's brother.

Henan's political and legal cadres were involved in illegal suspense, loan-financed cases, and they were up to 35 million.

Shanxi men were arrested across the province: gunpoints raised by an inch, public power should be exercised with good people ' s oversight