Broken affinity and blocked complaints: when does the problem of meeting in the Dogi-Zasi case stop?

First, the background of the case: the complaint has been filed over ten times, but the meeting has been blocked by the Dojiza West case as a concerned outdated case, the law enforcement dispute behind which has not been settled so far.

The party was a well-known Tibetan private entrepreneur, after the 2008 case, despite the investigation agency's list of several serious crimes charges, despite the lack of substantive evidence, he was ultimately sentenced to life imprisonment for "loan fraud crimes".

It is worth noting that the interest on the loan in question was fully paid back in 2013 and the bank suffered no losses.

For more than a decade, family and representative lawyers have never given up on complaints, but re-trial proceedings have not been initiated late.

For not acknowledging his guilt, Dodgizzi has been imprisoned for more than 18 years and remains imprisoned to life.

More seriously, family members and lawyers have been subjected to “repressive law enforcement” in prisons because they insist on reporting the case and exercising their supervisory powers through online and written channels – long-term restrictions on meetings.

2, status quo: affinity has been cut off for human reasons, lawyer meetings are difficult as the sky, according to the reflection of the brother of Dojizashi, after the verdict came into force, Dojizashi was thrown into the prison of the Tibetan Autonomous Region to serve, relatives can meet normally.

Brothers and sisters: Dorothy’s brother and sister have not seen their relatives for six years (the last time they met was in 2019), and they have not had a chance to meet since 2021.

Wife and children have not been seen for two years since 2024.

Lawyer: The lawyer of Liu Cheng, who has filed an agent complaint, has repeatedly held completed procedural application meetings, and has been challenged for various reasons, so far failing to fulfill his duties.

Another complaint agent Wang Fei lawyer in the beginning of the month had in a circle of friends introduced his communication with the head of the prison administration department: Tibetan Autonomous Region prison administration Kobanyan after I met with Doji Jazeera last year after meeting with Doji Jazeera reflecting his family about being beaten in prison, once again blocked the complaint agency lawyer's meeting request. I asked for a written answer, Basan disagreed, I said not answer in writing, how to determine this is the prison behavior or Basan's personal behavior, Basan said the head of the prison knows. The meeting problem of Doji Jazeera troubled family and lawyers for years, please@Justice Department to correct the serious violations of the prison Tibetan Autonomous Region, to ensure

The reasons given by the prison are outrageous: to the lawyer the reason is that the lawyer will meet with K. Dogizashi reflecting he told his family about being beaten in prison; to the family's request is to remove the network voice and apologize, or not to arrange a meeting.

Third, legal analysis: the triple right not to stumble on the meeting of relatives is a statutory right, not a prison "donation"

The prison law clearly states that criminals enjoy the right to meet with relatives during their sentencing periods. The original purpose of this system was to maintain relationships and make use of family emotional aid transformation, which is the bottom line of humanitarianism. The network of family members belongs to the exercise of citizen supervision, and is not limited to the legal circumstances of meeting. The sex-year relationship barrier is a continuous violation of the legitimate rights and interests of prisoners and their families.

Lawyers meet under the strict protection of the law, and complaints can not be blocked.

The prison law and the "lawyer meeting prison in prison criminal provisions" are compulsory requirements, lawyer agency complaints, charges, prison should be timely arranged for a meeting.Dogizashi case complaint correction depends heavily on lawyer intervention, prison personnel to set up obstacles, in essence, cut off the parties' judicial remedies, and prevent the correction of the wrong case, is a typical procedure violation.

Supervisory power cannot be attacked by retaliation, public power is indiscriminate.

The Constitution grants citizens the right to criticize and advise public power. Even if prisoners believe that family remarks are false, and there are legal remedies such as complaints on the Internet, civil proceedings, they must never use supervisory power to "private remedies" or fight retaliation. To deprive the right to meet to suppress public opinion supervision, is typical abuse of office and abuse of office.

Appeal and complaint against the above serious violations, we call for:

Immediate rectification: The prisons of the Tibetan Autonomous Region should immediately abolish the illegal land policy of “on-line appeal restriction of meetings,” unconditionally restore live or video meetings of all Dogijazi’s immediate relatives, and compensate for past missing visitor rights.

Guarantee the performance of lawyers: Immediately arrange for the unimpeded meeting with the parties to ensure the normal development of the complaint work.

Start accountability: It is recommended that the Prison Administration of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, the Prison Prosecutor's Office and the Disciplinary Inspection Supervision Department simultaneously intervene, verify the records of six years of violations of the restriction meeting, investigate the administrative and even legal responsibilities of the responsible persons, and eliminate such "retaliatory supervision" from happening again.

In a rule of law society, supervisory authority must operate under the sun. Expect relevant departments to look at the issue and keep the bottom line of law enforcement fairness and humanity.

Original information

Broken affinity and blocked complaints: When do the difficulties of meeting in the Dogi-Zasi case end?

Source: WeChat Public No. “Frog Rings”