[Is it in the public domain that the right to privacy is guaranteed? Finally, the supervisory decision was not supported by the Senior Inspection Court (2026] 728, stating that “the Beijing City Beijing (Shenzhen) Law Office can take away the medical records of persons diagnosed as being “psychiatry-free”. Is the Public Prosecutor ' s Office acting under the prerogatives of Chinese customs officials or is it acting under the law? The court and the prosecutor's office are not in the court office of Beijing City. A law firm should have paid the legal price for its unprofessional behaviour!

On 3 March 2023, I was forcibly taken to a doctor (interrogation by way of restriction of personal liberty) by the Beijing City Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) Law Office, the first law firm in mainland China to be forcibly taken to a doctor (interrogation by means of restriction of personal liberty). What happened to the Beijing City Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm, which is unprecedented in China and has fallen?

It is clear that the Beijing City Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm has not had a major collapse, but I will present the story behind the case and the root causes of the wrong system at the end of the text.

In this paper, I will discuss the legal implications of the MPR (2026] 728 does not support the supervisory decision. I hope that the people ' s procuratorate of Guangdong Province will continue to review the case, revoke the decision of the Shenzhen City Public Prosecutor ' s Office and initiate protest supervision. I will also continue to pursue the subsequent President's correction process until the case is corrected. Please see if I have a legal and factual basis for my analysis below. Who is right? Who's wrong? [Is it possible that the right to privacy is guaranteed by means of open privacy?

(a) The note to the effect that the supervisory decision was not supported by the DPP [2026] 728: the Public Prosecutor ' s Office considers that a lawyer ' s office may legalize the delivery of a medical service that restricts personal freedom by accepting the authorization of the father of an official in the sense of "compulsory medically-referred person" (hereinafter referred to as "the patient" or "the patient") in the biological (and not sociological) sense of "the patient" (the Shenzhen Customs Service, directly under the General Customs Administration); (b) Compulsory payment of medical expenses and 3 violation of the patient ' s right to privacy and access to medical records without the patient ' s consent.

Please ask, does the Public Prosecutor ' s Office use the Public Prosecutor ' s Office ' s seal to allow Chinese officials to use their privileges to cover the law?

The case is a legal or a privileged one, so let us look at the following questions:

I. Can law firms engage in activities other than legal services? Answer: No. According to article 30 of the Law on Lawyers, “Law firms may not engage in activities other than legal services” and this free conduct is also defined as an activity if the law firm enters into a contract of “free representation” on a daily basis.

In this case, the Beijing City Kyoshi (Shenzhen) law firm was not the legal adviser to Shenzhen Customs Officer Zhi Minh (ID No. 4403011960707254), but rather the perpetrator of the restriction of personal liberty (interrogation by means of restriction of personal liberty). Under article 30 of the Lawyers Act, “law firms may not engage in activities other than legal services”, which would not have been able to engage in activities of social organizations other than legal services. The business does not necessarily have a direct profit space, and if a law firm enters into a “free representation” contract on a daily basis, this free act is also defined as an activity.

/ In the words of the law, the law means that law firms are not permitted to perform services other than legal services.

Turning to the subject, please ask, is it legal to make medical treatment compulsory (interrogation by way of restriction of personal liberty), to pay medical fees and to obtain medical records?

II. Can a law firm obtain (take) a medical record without the consent of the patient, and does this violate the privacy of the patient? What's the point? Answer: Violation of privacy rights. According to article 1332 of the Civil Code, “natural persons have the right to privacy. No organization or individual may violate the privacy of others by spying, intrusive, disclosing or making public. Privacy is the private life of a natural person and the privacy of the person, his private activities, his private information which he does not wish to know, and Article 17 of the Medical Institutions Medical Record Management Regulations, which states that “the medical institution shall receive applications for the copying or access to medical records and shall provide them with the required copying or access to services: (i) [the patient himself] or [his delegated] representative”

Let's talk about a global commons. Most countries around the world, particularly developed countries, which country allows relatives and friends of the patient (patient) to entrust the patient (patient) with the patient ' s medical record without his/her consent? If the patient refuses to pay for the medical treatment, if he refuses to attend, if he is forced to diagnose it, or if he is not sick? Is it possible?

Or, could the payment of medical expenses on behalf of the medical services be a “unconditional” equivalent to the acquisition (trade) of medical records?

The answer is clearly — it's impossible.

Next, we will talk about the rule of law and the facts of the case:

Article 17 of the Regulations on the management of medical records in medical institutions provides that medical institutions shall receive requests for the copying or review of medical records from the following persons and institutions and provide them with the services required for copying or accessing them:

(i) [the patient himself] or [the patient has entrusted] to the agent;

(ii) [Legal heirs of deceased patients] or [other] agents.

Article 1332 of the Civil Code, which provides that natural persons have the right to privacy. No organization or individual may violate the privacy of others by spying, intrusive, disclosing or making public. Privacy is the private space of the natural person ' s private life and the privacy of the person, the private activity and the information that he does not want to know about.

Please ask where do the laws allow the patient's family and friends to review his medical records? Is the clinic ' s activities private activities carried out by patients in private space? Who's in the public eye? Is the medical record a private information? If the medical records are placed on the table, the non-patient who enters the clinic without the patient's permission to take the medical records before the doctor is “infringement of the privacy of others by means of espionage, intrusion, disclosure, publicity, etc.”.

March 2023, I was forcibly taken to a doctor, I was a patient. On the same day, I refused to pay for the clinic, I refused to cooperate with the consultations, but I was forced to for the same day. Diagnosis ended up being unpsychiatric and I left. But I'm a patient, and I'm a patient, and I'm being taken away by someone who's causing my privacy to be violated. The Beijing City King (Shenzhen) law firm, when I refused to pay for the clinic, and the clinic, and the customs officer of Shenzhen, who abandoned me as a child and had no “parental status certificate”, imposed the fee and asked a doctor to visit me.

Made, forged, altered and made of an evidentiary material for less than 50 yuan.

Finally, the SDI [2026] 728 does not support the supervisory decision, stating that “the Beijing City Kyoshi (Shenzhen) law firm can take away the medical records of persons diagnosed as being mentally ill”. Are the cases handled by the Public Prosecutor ' s Office under the prerogative of the customs officer or are they conducted under the law? No one's in Beijing City's Shenzhen law firm! A law firm should have paid the legal price for its unprofessional behaviour.

III. Why does the law firm take the medical records? Take my medical records. What's the point? Why would the court legalize the taking of the medical records? Answer: The way to fake photo albums. If they cannot legally take (exposure) the medical records, they cannot change them on the spot and produce a false medical record

Is modern the age of electronic evidence (electronic evidence) if the original of a material (paper) has been modified and the electronics that do not match the original are authentic? Answer: No. How do you fake your medical records? Please see the following steps.

The steps taken to forge the medical records are:

The first edition of the medical file was forged and stamped by a doctor at the scene, and the medical file was taken, taken and taken, taken and circulated to others in private, and then destroyed, as stated by the Shenzhen City Public Prosecutor ' s Office;

2 The law firm asked the hospital doctor to forge the second edition of the medical file and to print it and stamp it. The firm took the medical file and took it and took it and gave it to others in private, following a statement by the Shenzhen City Public Prosecutor ' s Office.

With such push. The patient cannot decide on the writing, access and personalization of the medical records.

IV. Restrictions on the status of mandatory medical evacuations? Can the right to personality and identity, i.e. the right to personal status, be easily delegated? Of course not. Personal rights are not property rights

I am very surprised that the right to personality and identity can be delegated to non-blood relatives to perform this right? Even in custody, there is a place to be held. What is Beijing City's law firm trying to get to the top?

My parents are the thousands of dead?

In 2023, Beijing City Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm informed the matrilineal clans that I live in a relationship with?

Article 28 of the Civil Code, “A person who is not in a civil capacity or who restricts his or her civil capacity shall be the guardian [in order] of the following persons: (i) spouse; (ii) Parents, children; (iii) Other close relatives...”.

The Beijing City of Shenzhen Customs Officer, who had entrusted the Beijing City Beijing Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) Law Office to exercise personal rights (i.e. to enforce medical treatment), has also been found guilty of failing to exercise his personal rights.

“The defendant has therefore made an error and the act of entrusting his friend to bring the plaintiff to medical care constitutes an infringement of the plaintiff's right to personality, according to article 113 of the Civil Code: `If the infringement of the personal rights and interests of a natural person causes serious moral damage, the aggrieved person shall have the right to claim moral damages', so the defendant has made a decision to compensate the plaintiff for moral damage”.

To return to the present case, if the client, Shenzhen Customs Officer, had committed an act that constituted a violation, the trustee, Beijing Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm, should naturally have done so.

Is the client a violation and its gunman, fighter, and hacker not a joint violation?

The People ' s Procuratorate of Guangdong Province is expected to review and revoke the supervisory decision and initiate a protest supervisory action, as required by law, by the Senior Public Prosecutor ' s Office (2026] 728 and to order the court to reopen case (2025) No.

Why did Beijing City King (Shenzhen) law firm push itself to the top of the world? Answer: The first-hand information of society is, of course, in their own hands, so that they can be trafficked. After all, the Beijing City Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm is defrauding hundreds of dollars of public money, and it is not a good project to do legal cases of revocation of the law. Unfortunately, I've never had the chance to get information from the uninvited Beijing City Department of Law.

The fact is that Chen Shui of the Beijing City Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) Law Office and the University of the Northwest of Law and Law, Faculty of Administration, level III, 2002 (i.e. alumni of the present School of Politics and Public Administration) were appointed to the Beijing Office of Letters and Visits. He is a low-ranking political broker from Beijing without family resources. After he incited me to exchange evidence in June 2021 in an undercover brothel, Chen forced me to be questioned at the firm on the grounds that the firm had prohibited my business seal and called me “the Guangdong Bar Office” as the reason for my recruitment. In 2023, the public security authorities questioned his assignment to cover up the brothel, and Chen was concerned that I had a recording of his first call with me (formulated in June 2021). I don't know. I'm demanding good. I'm lazy with the crap. He might have imagined that he would be able to hold first-hand material in such a way that he would be able to do a great job, without knowing that he was not. Who gives the trash when they have the material? Huh.

In 2025, the Beijing City Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) Law Office became the first law firm to file complaints against the 12345 hotline of the Judicial Service Department (the Chinese mainland Government Service Hotline, which is the government complaints hotline).

In June 2026, the law firm Guangdong Tyrone, a Beijing-based Beijing-based Beijing-based Beijing-based law firm, was revoked from its licence to practise as a real prosecutor at the Tai Lung firm.

Chen, as a non-law undergraduate and a lawyer from Shurayra, who is also a non-law general, is the core participant in the case.

The business of Beijing City's law firm Shenzhen has become:

VI. As for the client in this case, what was Shenzhen Customs Officer's intention?

Of course it's abandonment.

Shenzhen Customs never participated in one of my electrical maintenance, medical treatment, New Year's Eve activities in my life. Before my mother died, she asked him to take me to see the hospital (with fever) and pay for the medical care. He refused to do so every time until I was too hot to walk, and refused to send me to the hospital. The purpose of the mandatory psychiatric hospital in Shenzhen was to refuse to take me to any hospital to see any kind of illness and pay for it, which he considered to be a manifestation of mental delusion if the claim was “to have the father take his daughter to see even one of them”.

Shenzhen Customs officials have abused their authority and asked my matrilineal clan to keep me from my relatives and to sell me. At the moment, I say that I do not have the names of the people of my patrilineal clan, nor do I have the material of my patrilineal people (photos, medals, evidence of the activities of buying the goods). I do not know the names of my brother, uncle and uncle, and the customs authorities in Shenzhen had only tried to prevent me from knowing my brother and uncle and grandmother, so that they would have wanted Beijing City Kyoshi (Shenzhen) law firm to force me to compromise and take over by force.

If not, any patient with a disease is dependent on his relatives, and Shenzhen Customs may well request Zhi Minh's relatives to replace the Beijing Beijing Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm for “relationship”: Article 14 of the Civil Service Law states that “civil servants shall fulfil the following obligations: (vi) to lead the way in the implementation of the core values of socialism, to uphold the rule of law, to observe discipline, to observe professional ethics, and to be exemplary in the observance of social and family virtues”.

Beijing City Beijing (Shenzhen) Law Office and I were not close? Neither my colleagues nor my friends were involved. If the administration of the company that is licensed to practice is a colleague, the IESS staff that is attached to the social security scheme are my colleagues.

The case file also shows that no person with whom she had a substantive life or working relationship (labour relations, case cooperation) participated.

What's the story of this case in the history of the disease? *

Shenzhen Customs Officer Chen Yan Ling, the former wife of Shenzhen, was forced into prostitution for her irresponsible behaviour, her daughter was assisted by a child friend, kept calling the police and informed the police of the police ' s activities when they were caught. Shenzhen Customs officials have commissioned public security and the community to cover up the atrocities of Shenzhen Customs officers who had abandoned them as their soldiers, as a child. Shenzhen Customs officials had sought out a judicial assessment of her daughter's involvement in the child-friendly relationship, which had led her to take a desk with the police and the institution. Later, as his daughter did when she was a child, he entrusted the community with the task of sending rice by force (in the name of money in the union, in the name of the brothel) in order to obtain a low-privileged transfer to the Government for “adoption”. Since unaccompanied persons are often involved in fraudulent groups or brothels, mental illness, etc., can lead to their being unable to work, and those without relatives are forced to work as chickens and “adolescents” to the Government, and arrange for a marriage certificate for the clients and clients. After all, what is not responsible for blood-grandmothering, you want society to double the reimbursement and take responsibility for it? This pattern is usually one in which people are either sold or sent to the Government.

Twenty years ago, this tool was used mainly to clean up cases of prostitution by government officials. Government officials need to find black land (e.g. rural) to hide and feed. Even black people and traffickers are being treated. As indicated below, is the law firm of the Beijing City of Shenzhen, which is not a relative, entitled to refer to relations and marriage?

VII. What is the true picture of the Tsenghu in this case? Zeng Yu has asked the public to investigate and prosecute cases of prostitution and illegal relations. The public security (Director Wang Mon (Simple 061245), Vice-President Yuan Chunping (Simple 05538), the civilian police officer Yang (CIVPOL 056713) and the civilian police officer Liang Jiahou (CPV 050649}) considered the opening of a house in the 2022 detention of Zeng Yuen, who tried to educate the Public Security Institute in various ways to investigate and conduct a case. Can video and photographs of the arrest of a prostitute be obtained and made available by relatives of either party? It is called the crime of violating citizens' personal information (or a punishment for public order). Who gives the privilege of protection from criminal conduct to parents, children and spouses?

Article 151 of the CCP Disciplinary Regulations [Chapter XI on penalties for violations of life discipline] has been used against another person [in an improper sexual relationship], causing adverse effects, warning or serious warning of punishment; (b) In cases of aggravating circumstances, be given a penalty for dismissal from the party or for reserving the party for inspection; In serious cases, the dismissal is imposed.

Use of authority, correctional, [subordination or other similar relationships] to have sexual relations with another person, [remunerated].

As a result, my blood-relationship was destroyed by the "third person" of Beijing City's Beijing Department of Law.

In the 1990s, Shenzhen's authority was not central. In 1989, there were only 100 civil servants in Shenzhen. Shenzhen Customs is the vertical leadership of the General Customs Administration and is the direct organ of the State Council. In the same year, the Shenzhen Customs Inspectorate and the Shenzhen Customs and Excise Department had been conducting police operations with officials from Shenzhen City Security and National Security Directorate, whose powers had not yet been transferred to the central Government.

Shenzhen Customs Service executives, who had been in office since 1989, had been interested in doing their job and had never been able to win the highest ranking in the Beijing City Department (Shenzhen). After all, a law firm is not equal to a lawyer, and no lawyer would have paid more than his or her own resources and resources to fight for the law firm. The Beijing City Beijing (Shenzhen) law firm, the “third person”, is nothing more than a delusional assumption of office.

VIII. Concluding remarks. Formerly, Zhang Yi, a lawyer at the King Zejun (Shenzhen) law firm in Beijing, was told that “the search skills of Tseng Yu are such that she cannot learn and copy, and she relies on her thinking to retrieve”. Now, I'm stuck in this position with a junk law firm.