Cherry Tree is dead, and defenders are arrested: how does the Dalian farmer get into criminal custody?

A paper-leached agricultural sales list identifies the name, quantity and price of pesticides purchased from the cherry grove. A long survey organized by defenders in 2024, which was combined with a farmer photo, plant damage assessment and a reply from the administrative authorities, attempted to explain where the farmers in the large company bought the medicine and why the fruit trees died. Two years later, the plaintiffs, Kowe and Gywai, were arrested and Hong Guangyu, a former journalist who helped them to pursue the issue, was also detained across the province.

Around 2022, large areas of trees were found dead in the Dalianwa House and surrounding cherries, involving farming resources from the Temple's sales system. Some farmers commissioned an accreditation body to obtain advice in support of the damage to trees caused by copper-containing pesticides; In 2023, experts from local agricultural sector organizations assessed that the main cause was fungi disease. Behind both technical conclusions, farmers argue more than botanical: family-owned multi-year planting inputs, household income and bank debt may be rewritten as a season of fruit tree death.

The purchase certificate retained by the farmer shows that > The 2024 open survey was accompanied by a sales bill maintained by farmers, with an inventory of agricultural assets, quantities purchased and amounts paid. The document proves the sale and sale activities and the name of the product, but cannot claim that the product itself causes the death of the tree. It is the starting point of the chain of evidence in this case.

Another old photo left the defenders in the camera. , predated in the photo made public in the 2024 survey, digital dimensional farmers were standing side by side. After the damage in 2022, they moved on to cause of loss and compensation, and the case later evolved from agricultural disputes to criminal measures of constraint against several parties. The photographs record the real person in a collective dispute, not the 2026 detention site.

We have come a long way before the Court. He sued parties such as Temple Inc. for the loss of fruit trees. (a) The determination of causal link between some of the products and the tree damage at first instance, without the recognition of the amount of the loss and therefore the claim for compensation was not supported; The second trial found that the key facts were still pending and was remitted for re-examination. Farmers did not fail to enter the proceedings, but did not receive final compensation for years after they entered the proceedings. Meanwhile, the producer, Li Guange, who criticized the product, was awarded $200,000 in another case, and public expression has become an action that entails high costs.

In September 2026, criminal proceedings suddenly ran faster than civil disputes. > > > /a >, and > > > >, the husband was taken away and arrested on 16 September; On the same day, the arrest of Yu Kewei was authorized. On 19 September, Hong Guangyu ' s residence in Xiamen was taken by the Dalian police, and the family received a notification of suspected involvement in a search for pain. <a href="https://msguancha.com/a/lanmu9/2026/0927/25861.htmlThe rights channels such as Humans Watch, which are known as and the lawyers involved are subject to coercive measures. The individual cases are not identical to the charges, but for the fruit-farmers, the chain of detention directly reduces their ability to continue organizing evidence and proceedings.

Hong Guangyu is not a buyer or buyer of this agricultural business. He was a journalist for Beijing Science and Technology and a long-time author of the General Science Science of Food Safety and Agriculture. The way in which the growers were involved in the dispute was by organizing complaints, modifying the reports and publicly challenging the expert ' s conclusions. and archived in the Chinese digital age; Even when detention information has been brought to the attention of society, public discussions are still being held on platforms and environmental constraints are being reviewed.

The core of the dispute has changed as the case has shifted to criminal proceedings: the existence of the product is problematic and can be judged by identification, production records and civil proceedings; Farmers question the adequacy of administrative investigations and should remain in open and controversial procedures. When the public security authorities concentrated on criminal measures against the participants in the dispute, defenders had lost their freedom of movement without having been given full answers on their product liability. This has led to the de facto involvement of the State ' s criminal powers in the dispute over compensation between private and business enterprises and has altered the ability of both parties to continue to claim their rights.

The documents kept by the farmers are still there and there is no reference to “scathing”. The initial requirement was to identify the cause of the death of the fruit tree, calculate the loss and hold it accountable. Four years later, the media reported on detention centres, lawyers ' meetings and cross-provincial arrests. The farmers paid for several bottles of farm money on that sales list, and now they pay a very different price to track their consequences.