Exploring new ideas on corruption: the thinking of severe punishment and source governance

It's not gonna end. It's not gonna end!

Every day, you brush your circle and you see the most news of an official being down.

It's either tigers or flies.

Why, is corruption a curse that cannot be left behind?

Too many tigers? Or can't the cages?

Let us first analyse the root causes: how corruption is generated.

My answer is: humanity.

Greedy is the two main human natures.

That's probably what Confucius called "colour-eating" is.

Can a man not be greedy when he has in his hand everything he can decide a lot?

I'm afraid he won't be greedy if he's not gonna be able to slap his chest.

Capitalist claims that capital has 100 per cent profit, and it dares to trample on all human laws; With 300% profit, it dared to commit any crime.

If a person can produce millions or even hundreds of millions of dollars by signing a letter, it can also trample on all human laws and dare to commit any crime or even hang.

Some might think that if I were an official, I could have been a few million people who could have been comfortable for a lifetime, and there was no need to be a no-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go-go.

Those who say this are not aware of humanity.

Or, rather, the magic of power.

The thing about greed, like the Pandora Box, opens it, and it won't hold.

When a man has hundreds of thousands, he thinks of millions. With millions, hundreds of millions of millions of dollars.

When a greedy official feels that he has enough money to spend his whole life, he thinks that future generations will be enough to spend their whole lives.

The lawsuits were raised by the corrupt and corrupt tigers.

This is not about good or bad people, nor about morality, but about “growing endlessly”.

This is the root cause of corruption.

Power is used to serve the people, not to corrupt.

To curb corruption, the State has established a disciplinary commission and a supervisory body.

But the relationship between the disciplinary and supervisory bodies and corruption, like the relationship between cats and mice, is endless, uncapturing, re-emerging, and springing.

Now we're going to discuss the second topic: Why can't we just get the corrupt officials?

In one word, the cost of crime is too low, as the heart is lucky.

Of the corruption of officials, 99.99 per cent was committed in secret and the probability of detection was lower.

It is this kind of luck that every corrupt official feels that his problems cannot be discovered.

But when the centimetres are short, the 100 corrupt officials have a chance of being investigated.

The work done by the disciplinary and prosecutorial boards is how to maximize this probability.

In addition to the problem of impunity, another source of corruption is the low cost of crime.

An official, even if the amount of corruption is greater, is probably life or life imprisonment.

A hundred years of life, nothing but life and death.

If you can't die, there's nothing you can't bear.

At the expense of one ' s freedom, and in the light of the wealth that will be laid for generations to come, the vast majority of people will find it a more profitable business.

Since “crime costs too low” lead to corruption, there is no way to contain or eliminate it.

The way, of course there is.

In the official press release, I often read the phrase “to keep officials from being corrupt”.

That is a phrase that sounds reasonable, but it stinks a hundred times more than shit.

I just want to ask: How can officials not be corrupt?

You give him a million years' pay, he'll have tens of millions or even billions of goals.

How can officials not corrupt?

Does a life sentence or life imprisonment deter officials from corrupting?

In a word, no death penalty can deter a corrupt soul.

Since we cannot “resist from corruption”, we must have the iron blood to “dignify”.

For example, the death penalty is imposed on those who have accumulated more than 200,000 people in corruption.

Personally, officials do.

Over 200,000 people are going to die. That's the real use of life to corrupt.

With this sword hanging over your head, the greed of the vast majority of officials can be stifled in the bud.

That is enough to cure the causes.

Official corruption is mostly the result of bribery.

There is a need to pay bribes, given the bribes that have been received.

The problem of bribery is therefore also a problem that needs to be addressed from the source.

The offence of active and passive bribery is a matter that has been called for more than a decade but is not legally recognized.

But today, it seems imperative.

Imagine that a businessman who is found to bribe more than 200,000 will be sentenced to death, and no one will dare to bribe with their lives!

The “source” of the bribe is broken and the bribe becomes a source of no purpose.

So I conclude by concluding that corruption is more than 200,000 death sentences and that the same offence of bribery can reduce corruption by at least 95 per cent.

Of course, many officials have seen my proposal and are expected to pee in fear.

After all, the more than 200,000 corrupters are estimated to be as many as the stars in the sky.

So I suggest that one of the prerequisites be added: the law is not retroactive.

In other words, former corruption is dealt with under the previous regulations, and then corruption is the equivalent of 200,000.

Of course, the probability of this proposal being adopted is estimated at less than one in 1,000.

But people, it's gotta be a little ideal.

What if it does.