The case of Sun Chun-woo, Deputy Director of Shenyang Railways, raised concerns about the alleged bribery of his family, who claimed that there was a number of evidence in question.

Sun Chun-Yu, former Deputy Director of Shen-yang Railways, born in 1957, 69 years old, retired for nearly 10 years, his wife Li Guihua, 72 years old, and his junior high school and high school classmates, a nurse at a hospital, retired for over 10 years, had a good relationship, retired, Sun-Yung-Yung had no more questions, lived a free and retirement day with his wife, one day in 2025, two couples were taken home from the buying of food, he told his wife that nothing happened, I would return in a few days, but that this trip was over a year without going home, and his wife was his wife. Crying red eyes.

Li Guihua was also invited to tea, which was a psychological torture, which was a devastating blow to one of her nurses, who did not want to live, took a great deal of sleeping pills, was taken to hospital, and, after over seven hours of rescue, returned to the world.

Sun Chun-tao, a regular railway worker, was a man of every foot, and he was a man of every reason, from a rail worker to a dispatcher, to the station chief at the railway station, to the railway office director and eventually to retire from the post of Deputy Director of Shenyang Railways.

After 44 years of work, Sun Chun-thou devoted his life to the north-east railway, where he never made a fool of himself, never profited from the law, never acquiesced in the violation, and that was the right thing to do.

Sun Chun-Tai was detained, arising from a common rental dispute, a real-name informant, Zhao Yuti, who had operated a restaurant at Changchun Train Station and whose business was not in compliance with the regulations, after the expiry of the lease, when Sun-Tyu-Tai refused to renew his request.

Jo Yute has been angry and has reported to Sun Chun's true name, claiming to bribe Sun Chun's friends for millions of dollars, which has continued for many years. In the recordings kept by the family and submitted to the Monitoring Board, Sun Chun-Tyu spoke to her son, who claimed that he had not been paid a penny and that she had made a false complaint, which Hu Xudong, the author of the initial investigation by the Monitoring Board, had clearly stated with her family that the complaint was false.

However, Sun Chun-Tu was pushed by the wheel of the procedure and the case is now at the first instance stage.

According to the family statements, the crime of bribery was committed against Sun Chun's friend, who, in order to thank Sun Chun's help, was prepared to deliver 1 million to his friend, 50,000 to him every year, but 13 years later, he was not seen as a substitute for Sun Chun's brother, who had not received a specific place of receipt or a recipient, and had been counted as one million for the bribe he received.

The family said that, in this logic, Sun Chun-thou took 20 years, which was already in his 80s, a form of bribery that was unknown, and retired for many years, and why collect $50,000 a year if he wanted it? It is not logical to be so serious.

The family states that after Sun Chun's detention, the authorities did not search the house for a single piece of dirty money, that Sun's nephew opened a delivery station, that he placed some groceries on the second floor, that Sun's brother was tall, that he wanted to give his undressed old clothes away, that he had to leave them behind, that he had no suitable delivery, that he had to leave them on the second floor of the nephew's express post, that someone could wear them and that his nephew had to send them. There is local wine in the house, also on the second floor of the nephew's express delivery station. Anyone who wants it, ask the nephew to give it to him, and the nephew is also called for tea.

During his stay, Sun Chun-thou ' s home was searched, his son ' s home, his family ' s home and his sister ' s home were searched every time and none of the stolen money was found.

The family submits that the signatures of the persons involved in the case were forged and that a handwriting check was made, which was not identical, that is, the signatures of the persons involved in the case were not signed by the persons themselves, and that a number of signatures of the persons involved in the case were identified by the specialized expert bodies, which confirmed that the large number of signatures of the persons involved in the case in the record was forged.

Based on various doubts, family members and defence counsel applied for pre-trial meetings to exclude illegal evidence, for access to all simultaneous audio and video recordings, and for witnesses to appear for cross-examination.

The family stated that so many procedures were illegal, that many witnesses had been honest about the truth about the lack of money and that more than 400 cases were clearly false, in the hope that the case would be brought to the attention of all levels of leadership and of society at large, and that it would be tried in the light of the sun and monitored by the people.