Decade of Demolition Dispute: How to resolve mail visits?

In 2016, Jiangxi, Zhejiang Province, Jiangxi, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China,

First, the demolition business origin: two completely different narrative cases involving houses built in 2007, for Chen Lime and his wife funded the construction, opened a supermarket, two-tiered business clothes, is the main source of income of the family. The contradiction from the signing of the contract buried the completely opposing two versions of the narrative. Chen Lime's account: the husband Chen Long rich was under the coercion of black people to sign an empty agreement. At the time, the mayor and village director pointed out that the black people who had been sentenced to life imprisonment were under pressure, threatened by the family's personal safety, forced to sign; and promised to give 480 square meters of house base and 105 million yuan of housing construction funds; the 243.8698 million yuan of the

105 million, promised by the local government in the form of borrowing by Chen Long Woo written reply: husband Chen Long Woo voluntarily signed a compensation settlement agreement, chose to resettle itself, 243.8698 million including houses, accessories and self-released home base compensation of the whole amount, after the signing of the agreement no longer separately allocate the home base; 105 million belongs to Chen Long Woo individual borrowing, belongs to private debt, does not belong to government demolition compensation; the project has province, city, district officially printed project work documents; has been in accordance with the then collective land demolition policy to give "resettlement" business compensation; many times assisted Chen Lime family to find home base, under rural "one house one house"

According to the judgment of the Supreme Court of Beijing, on September 21, 2021, Chen Liwei was sentenced to seven months in prison for the purpose of seeking an administrative detention in order to disrupt the order of the units of the People's Court of Chen Liwei's public security agency, and was sentenced to six months in prison for the purpose of seeking an administrative detention in order to disrupt the order of the units of Chen Liwei's public security agency.On September 11, 2021, Chen Liwei was arrested by the police of Chen Liwei's public security agency and sentenced to six months in prison for seeking an administrative detention in order to disrupt the order of Chen Liwei's public security agency.On September 21, 2021, Chen Liwei rejected his criminal

Chen Limei was taken away from the National Security Bureau for the second time in 2021, and on August 21, 1925, Chen Limei was sentenced to ten days of administrative detention in order to disrupt the unit order. Chen Limei disobeyed the penalty, applied for administrative review to the People's Government of Chen Limei, and subsequently filed an administrative lawsuit, from the subjects of the case, inter-provincial arrest and criminal detention procedures, evidence effectiveness and other aspects to defend the lawfulness of the punishment, while applying for the relevant governmental and village cadres to appear in court for questioning. The second criminal proceedings (now in custody, pending court stage): on February 1, 2026, Chen Limei was arrested and detained in Beijing.

(Photo from the network) the legal community has always existed to discuss the boundaries: lawful letter-to-call rights defense and provocative crime, disruption of the state organs work order crime, blackmail and extortion crime boundaries. the relevant guidelines of the highest judicial organs are clear: simple multiple visits are not equal to a crime; it is strictly forbidden to criminalize administrative disputes for simple purposes; whether there is an illegal occupation purpose, whether the threat is really implemented, is the key to distinguish between defense claims and extortion and extortion, such as criminal cross-cases, the court needs to combine all the evidence and judgment.

1: Disassembly of archive information

Her family subsequently applied for disclosure: decision-making, compensation settlement scheme and announcement, complete compensation settlement agreement, settlement, agreement annex; establishment authorization documents of the "320 State Road Engineering Command Department"; whether her husband has separately signed the "abandonment of the premises commitment". the administrative agency's multiple responses showed: the compensation settlement bill, the agreement annex information does not exist; has provided the project coordination command establishment documents, stating that the contents of the agreement relating to the settlement have been written into the main agreement, there is no separate abandonment of the premises commitment. In this case, Chen Limey is not approved. She in the lawsuit, reconsideration application, can not use internal coordination documents to replace the

2 Disclosure of public security law enforcement evidence

One of the controversial information disclosure requests was to apply for disclosure in the 2020 public security penalty to determine that she was “pronounced to be registered in the Beijing National Bureau of Visitors 100 times” scene, presence, and evidence carrier. The State Department of the U.S. Public Security Bureau replied: The information belongs to the secret of the police work, not to be disclosed. The administrative review of the U.S. People’s Governmentins the response. Chen Liemie filed an administrative lawsuit, her core view: the fact is that the administrative penalty is the key fact basis for the establishment of the law enforcement process, does not belong to the secret of the police work; the label “police work secret” is widely placed on the label, but the case has not been submitted

3 Disclosure of Cross-Provincial Collaborative Letters

In response to Beijing's control of the transfer of Jiangxi in September 2021, Chen Li-Mei filed an administrative re-examination complaint with the Supreme People's Court for a special reason: although the arrest act occurred in 2021, but he was only in 2025 to know through government information to respond to the public that "the coordination letter does not exist", the re-examination filing period should be calculated from the time of knowledge of the answer, and can not simply be calculated by the time of the act in 2021.

4: Opening up funding information

Chen Lime also applied for the publication of the 113 million, more than 30 million inquiry funds referred to by the Yuan Town Government. The answer of the city government belongs to internal affairs, procedural information, not to be disclosed. She filed a lawsuit, claiming that the expenditure has been determined by the criminal judgment secretary, belongs to the actual implementation of financial funds, does not belong to procedural information, should be disclosed to stakeholders, request to verify the existence of false financial funds.

Hearing to avoid dispute: The Yuan Town Government intends to organize a letter to hear the demolition matter. Chen Limee submitted a request to avoid the dispute, arguing that the Yuan Town Government is a party to the conflict of interests in the demolition dispute, can not, as the organ of the organization of the hearing, apply for the overall avoidance, requiring the higher level by the organ to organize the hearing.

Supervision, judicial charges: Chen Limei submitted a large number of real-name charges materials to multiple departments, accusing the former mayor and village director of compulsory signing and abuse of powers; accusing the Yuan Town government of fake news and stabilizing receiving funds; accusing the public security case procedure of illegal; accusing the judge of suspected wrongdoing for the first time.

Letter visit review application: for the letter visit processing response issued by the Pyongyang Town government in November 2025, submit a review application to the letter district letter visit review review committee, request the withdrawal of the answer, and argue that the imposition of compensation agreement should be invalid due to coercion, subject violation of the law.

In order to promote the implementation of the lawful settlement of the case, the lawful settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal settlement of the case, the legal sett

Original information

Chen Li-Mei's ten-year rights crisis: a dismantling dispute, leading to dozens of criminal and administrative lawsuits, how to resolve this letter visit?

Source: WeChat Public No. “The Guardian said”