Prominent lawyers were suspended and taken to criminal measures, and their faith in the rule of law was not changed.

Yu Kai, Director of the Shandong Xiaoqin Law Office, is known for his professionalism, courage and commitment to procedural justice, and has a high reputation in the legal profession.

On his many years of practice, he has always followed the law, defended the wrong-doer, tried to avoid the criminalization of civil disputes, practised professionalism and held office and protected the bottom line of justice.

In the face of the current state of affairs in the administration of justice, he has always been a legal figure, calling for a clear determination of the legal boundaries of the crimes committed, and has opposed the abuse of “pocket crimes” in order to promote the rule of law in a sincere spirit and to carry out the mission and the duties of the legal profession in practice.

It is this same commitment to the rule of law that has brought him to a close and close.

In July 2024, he was suspended from law practice, forced to stagnate in the rule of law for his life and deprived of his right to practice.

Even in the difficult situation of restricted practice, he remained convinced of the legal rights of citizens under the Constitution. He was alone, peacefully and rationally, exercising his constitutionally mandated right to express himself, without any excesses or irregularities.

It is a shame that the lawyer who has been calling for the clarification of the crime of stalking at the border and defending the seriousness of the law has been subjected to criminal coercive measures in order to find the cause of the offence.

From the respected director of the firm to the loss of liberty and the trap; The injustice of those who have carried out the defence of the rule of law, the physical restraints and the shadows of the way ahead, are an unbearable ordeal for all.

But this sudden change never defeated his will, but instead became a profound upgrading of his body to his heart, a nihilism belonging to the strong and most genuine practice of his faith in the rule of law.

Even in this situation, the faith in the rule of law and the piousness and trust of the State have not been wavered in the least.

He remained committed to the Constitution and the law, and remained convinced of the fairness and authority of the rule of law and that justice would come. He does not doubt the rule of law because of his own experience, he does not depart from his original sense by being stuck in a state of difficulty, and he has maintained the indomitable ethos and firm conviction of the legal person.

For him, the torment was not a fall, but a sting; It is not a setback, but a commitment to and implementation of the rule of law that goes deeper.

The true faith in the rule of law is not a generous statement in good times, but an uncompromising compromise in bad times; Never a high-profile declaration, but a first-rate one in a corner.

Even as the road went on, his faith in the rule of law remained strong and his trust in the State remained firm.

This unshakeable, unabandoned and uncompromising beginning is his strongest guardian of the rule of law, a legal man who has lived his life with faith and loyalty.