Counselor Zhou Zai wrote a question about Ning Yi-wei: The court ruled that the core of the innocent evidence was like a whistle.

Today (2026.10.19) I met Ning Yuzhi and signed the petition. The one who had previously expressed his discomfort at the judgement, and who asked me to help write the indictment, Ning Ting Ting-hee said that the two days that had elapsed since the judgement had been read were so dark. The game judge is a real big-time tactful man!

The misappropriation of $9.3 million in financial consultancy fees was a false accusation made by Boliva, who was in real control of Yeh Hua, and a criminal case of office appropriation built around a payment form signed by “no one” on the approving board. The testimony of the Bolicia employees was based on the “no” approval and approval of the approval of the payment.

In Mezhou, lawyers have found signs of “Yahhuaun” signatures on the authorization board of the payment report, and have applied for an identification, which the public security authorities have said cannot be confirmed.

The Shundh court commissioned an expert assessment that the “Yiphuamin” signature was in the approval field of the payment report, but was only erased. The false accusations that Boulette made against her for perjury have been confirmed; The alleged failure of Yehua to know and approve the payment was false.

The judgement of the Court of Judd left the case silent on the expert opinion in favour of the defence and trimped the evidence of the words, made the story hard and made the case so that he was guilty of the crimes of expediency and kindness.

Isn't it like a judge who pretends to be blind and does not judge the winner to win a game?

The so-called job-grabbing of low-cost buyers is the result of the tact of the crimes committed in Mezhou, mainly based on the testimony of Jin-jin and a house rental bill. Jin Jie-jin testified that he was pleased to determine the price of the shop and to arrange for its production to be of value, to produce a rental desk account and to place financial data on the table in seven rows.

Ning Ting denied having decided on the price of the store, and did not mention any account, claiming that Ye Hua was the one who decided on the store, fixed the price and arranged for the generous disposal. He decided to buy the case in the shop without the buyer being found in Wine. The argument of Wing Hui and Ning Yi's defence were corroborating, confirming that the trader involved in the case was Yip Hua's ability to arrange for a gentle disposition and to determine the price of the sale. The Court did not accept either of the two arguments.

When the case reached Shun De, Wen Hui saw the financial data on the handbook at the trial examination, stating that the seven lines of financial data were the contents of her book, the last four lines of which were written by her and Yehua was able to make her disposer's store, she would be given the bill of three handwritten books of financial data, which would be given to her as the case handler, which would write the financial data on the following four lines, in accordance with the statements of Ye Hua, and which would have given her information on the situation when Yehua was able to deliver to her disposer.

The defence and the accused requested the court to identify whether the last four trades on the desk were written by Jin-jin or by him, but the court took the examination without commissioning the identification.

The family of the accused commissioned an assessment confirming that the financial data on the last four trades on the bill were written in a gentle letter, that the defence of the defendant was true and that Jin-jin had perjured.

However, after the defence submitted its opinion to the Tribunal, the Tribunal served the participants in the proceedings, and the defence and the accused were awaiting notice of the hearing, but the Court directly notified the judgement, finding the defence guilty of the crime, and the judgement, which was equally silent on the new evidence submitted by the defence, the statement of opinion.

It's like a game, and the judges delay the game when the backward party is rushing to score. The judges have blown the whistle to end the game, and the backward side loses, and the chance to even it is not given.

Isn't that the Black Watch? I'm not going anywhere.

The members of the Joint Court in the Ning Dynasty and Win Hye case are Zhao Zhiyong, Huang Yan, and Wang Zhiyong.

The trial in the Ning Ding Hsiy and Win Hyu case was long and cold.