Second trial in the case of the alleged fraud: trial attorney recommended that the original sentence be set aside and remanded.

On 23 October 2026, the second trial in the case of alleged fraud against Kang Chiu (alias). The case was heard by the People ' s Intermediate Court of the City of Smoke, and the venue of the hearing was borrowed from the Court of the People ' s Court of Lungo City. The first trial was here six months ago, and it lasted two days.

People ' s Court of the city of Lungo.

The prosecutor of the public prosecutor ' s office in the city of smoketea filed a case in court, where the first instance judgement found that part of the facts had been wrong, and recommended that the original judgement be set aside and remanded. The Prosecutor also submits that the failure to deal with the 500,000 dollars involved in the first instance was a omission of judgement and that this part should be re-examined.

On 9 November 2024, the 6th floor of the administration bar at the Haigang Hotel on the Nine River Road in Shanghai, Vice President Lan Chijii, a large State-owned enterprise, handed $500,000 in cash and gifts to Kang-chi. The way this money came from. We used to write this.The Shandong Lungkushi case: 2 million "buyers" cannot be arrested by the police.It says that Blue Chi is the Chairman of the Board, and Wang Toronguchi has been able to work for him by sending $1.75 million to a Beijing official, a sum of $500,000 that was later paid for “car fares”.

Actually, it's only a month before Kang offered to return the money. He said that he had gone to Qingdao on 14 December 2024 to meet Sio Chi, to speak to him in person about his father-in-law ' s relationship with Sio Hoi and to propose that he return the $500,000; Blue Chi didn't receive it, and the answer was to wait for him and Wang to settle the matter. At that time, Blue Chi sent him a list of names of candidates nominated by the twin-star group to the Deputy Secretary of the Party, meaning that he had managed to “stop down” the names on the list.

After a dispute between the parties, Kang offered to refund the money and gave it to the Aoshima Commission, which refused to accept it. The police case was gradually upgraded, the money was not paid and the parties were not in dispute; The dispute is whether Kang-chi met Wang-gi in Lung-gi before he collected the money, and did he tell Wang-hee about his father-in-law's identity. This section concerns the ability of the police to handle the case.

The 500,000 won was later withdrawn and the first instance was sentenced to 10 years in prison for fraud.

(a) At this hearing, the defence read out the testimony that Wang had repeatedly told Blue Chiu that Kang ' s father-in-law had a special background and that he had been a strong man who had been assigned by the Beijing leadership, the Sou Bureau; Before going to Shanghai, Blue Chiu asked if he was meeting with the So-su Bureau, and Wang was “also a leader” and “all his men” were “greater than the officials of the So-su Bureau”.

The defence maintains that if there was a fraud, it was Wang Chi, not Kang. In her closing statement on the afternoon of 23 October, Kang-cho again pleaded not guilty.

I. Presented by the Prosecutor in court: mistimed first instance

This was made during the hearing of the trial attorneys following the court debate.

The woman prosecutor of the public prosecutor's office of the city of smoke Tai Tai who appeared before the court in support of the prosecution submitted that the information submitted by the public security organs during the second trial revealed that the first instance judgement found that Kang-cho had erred in the nodal point of “in part defrauding at Lungbong”, and that the issue had not been sufficiently examined at the first trial. In order to guarantee the appellant ' s right to defence, a retrial should be sent back, re-substantiating this part of the evidence, as well as the evidence submitted by the parties at the second hearing.

The first instance judgement found that Kang had committed “part of the fraud at Lungbong”, which was the basis for his conviction. This section can be established, depending on whether Lung-gu has jurisdiction.

The Prosecutor ' s remarks are directed at the procedural issues raised by the defence during the debate. The defence maintains that the first instance judgement accepted the interrogation notes of the investigating authorities, which were not read in court and were not examined, seriously deprived the parties of their right to litigate and should be set aside and remanded.

The trial prosecutor stated that the second review of the trial transcript and the video recordings of the trial in the trial file, in which the first instance prosecutor stated that “the transcript of the accused in the public security organs was essentially identical to the transcript in the public security organs and was not read out in the court of law”, was not without evidence and therefore did not constitute a procedural violation.

In response, the defence submitted that, in the preparation of the statement of Kang to the investigating authorities, the prosecutor of the first instance raised the case of the investigator who had an improper relationship with the victim and the accused, and the defendant who had confessed to the conduct of the investigator in relation to the physical punishment of the Gyeong-e, the content of his testimony was untrue, the exclusion of unlawful evidence was raised, and the issue of the investigators and the victims and witnesses transmitting electronic transcripts was raised, in which case the prosecutor chose not to read, and the failure to read here was either non-present or still procedurally illegal.

The prosecutor finally recommended it. It is up to the central point of contention in the case to see when that meeting took place, and the first instance was not clear, and the jurisdiction was established.

Question and Question * Que * * * Que * * Que *

At that time, the vice president of a group in Qingdao, Ran Chiji, wanted to take over the chairmanship, and to be able to handle his position, Wang sent $1.75 million to Souichi, a former official of a core ministry in Beijing. Blue Ones, in their tweets, call Sioux ones. Blue Chi then paid Kang a further $500,000 for “car fares” and promised to pay three or four million more when it was done. It's not clear who paid the $1.75 million.

Things didn't work out. On 20 August 2025, the Public Security Bureau of the city of Lungo opened an investigation into Kang-yu on fraud charges.

Wang is a dragon-song and has been operating fire and construction works in Qingdao for many years, and several companies are under his name. He and Lan Chii-ji met a few years ago and also worked on the Twin Stars Group. In November 2024, Blue Chi learned that the chairman of the group had retired in March 2025 and had moved on with his successor. Born in 1974, Blue Chi worked for over 20 years in Twin Stars, from the Director of the factory to the member of the Group Party Committee, the Secretary of the Committee, the Director of Security, with full-time education only at the junior high level, and later on on on-the-job education. He ranks in the group, roughly fourth and fifth.

Cases of fraud are regulated by the place of the offence or by place of residence, and are predominantly the place of the offence. Money is paid in Shanghai, Kang and father-in-law live in Shanghai, Blue or Io is living in Qingdao, where the crime is committed, Shanghai, where the crime is committed, and Shanghai, where the crime is committed, and where the crime is committed, and where the crime is committed, the case cannot be solved. It was a step back, saying that even if the mouth was relaxed to the location of the victim, it would be Aoshima. To be able to identify any fraud, Kang must have acted in a false manner to the victim.

So there was another meeting in the case: in early November 2024, before Shanghai met, Kang went to Lungbong and invented his father-in-law's identity in a tea shop for some people. This meeting led to the expression “place where part of the fraud was committed”.

Kang denied this meeting in court. According to him, he returned to his grandmother ' s grave in September 2024 and stayed around a week before and after the tenth. He went to a tea club with his classmates, and he went to a friend of Ko, Ko and Con, and four people, and he said he was talking to Con, who didn't know the place. He never met Wang Chi, he never added a wi-tsu, and he never left a telephone call, “I didn't know him at the time”. Kang's home is in Lungbong, he's in Shanghai for years, and it's common to come back a few times a year.

According to Kang-chi, his first meeting with Blue-Ii-chi was in Shanghai on 9 November

1. After sending him the resume of Blue One, the two people were contacted. He had no phone calls from Blue Chi, no tweets.

There is a micro-creditation in the court that shows where the ideas of blue mind come from. On November 5, 2024, four days before I met in Shanghai, Blue asked Wang Chiu: “Winding, isn't it to Shanghai to see the head of the Sioux Bureau? "The King, once again, is a leader, so don't worry, Blue. "Lang Ji said, "I always thought it was the Sioux Bureau, and Wang said one time it was his people," and he added, "The man who met was bigger than the Sioux Bureau officials. The blogger adds:

On 14 December 2024, Kang went to Qingxi Island to meet Sio Chiang, and made it clear to his face that his father-in-law had no connection with Sio Chi and that he did not know him. Lan Chiu-chi came up with a photo of So Ho-ho, saying Wang-gi told him that Kang-hee and Kang-hee's father-in-law were both working on this matter under an arrangement. Ask him if he knew him. Kang says he doesn't know him, and that's not true. The defender then asked if Len Chiu had by any means asked whether his father-in-law was leading the cadre. Kang Aki: No.

Kang offered to return the $500,000. The answer to Blue Chi is, is that he and Wang will be the first to settle the matter, and a listener will be the one to throw up.

III. Prior to the trial, a new set of statements and new tracks were completed by the Dragon Lian

At first instance, the defence filed a consumption record, vehicle card entry and payment record for Kang in Shanghai, pointing to two periods: from 1 October to 9 November 2024 and the afternoon of 8 September.

The first instance transcript says Kang was in Lungbong in October, but he was in Shanghai at that time; He said Kang met Wang Chi at the Dragon Tai Tea Club, but he was driving in Shanghai.

At this hearing, the prosecutor presented a collection of materials which the public security organs had re-required after the first instance judgement, from September to December 2024, including hotel occupancy records, consumption records and card tracks. These materials show that Kang Chiu-Tao had a track of action at the Lung Junh from 4 to 19 September 2024; On 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 November, he had a track in Shanghai; From 10 to 13 November, he stayed at a hotel in Lungbong.

Public Security Bureau of Lungo City.

In addition to the tracks, the Prosecutor produced four new witness statements, all in May

1. One each on 6 May and 26 May, and one each on 6 May. Four testimonies were made at the same new time: on 8 September 2024, Kang, Wang, Chi, Chi, Liu Chi and Yao were present. Wang mentioned that a friend of Qingdao wanted to be promoted to the Twin Star Group and Kang said that he would return to Shanghai to discuss with the husband.

The meeting moved from October to September 8th, and was in the same direction as the new one — but the new question arises, is it the words that force the evidence of the journey to be based on objective evidence?

Kang has challenged the police ' s statement again in court. He said Liu gave evidence that he had been here in October, but that he had not been here in October; The second testimony brought Yao Yao Yao into the room and said that he had visited the Lung mouth on 8 September, “I didn't even know him when he was talking about it”.

These new testimonies are contrary to the record presented by the defence at first instance. From 1 October to 9 November, Kang-chi ' s consumption record in Shanghai remained unchanged for more than 40 days; On 8 September, between 2 p.m. and 6 p.m., he was not in the Lungbong, driving in Shanghai, with his family, and was matched by a card and a payment record. The viewer ' s judgement was that the meeting could not be established unless the prosecution had obtained evidence that Kang left his mobile phone in Shanghai and was being paid for it.

In fact, this judgement was acknowledged by the Yantai City Prosecutor. Although the first instance prosecutor responded by stating that even if there was a record of consumption and a travel schedule, it could not be ruled out. The defence considered that this was not possible to prove and the prosecution had never produced evidence.

One basic background is that the police did not take Kang-yu ' s itinerary at first instance, and that the four testimonies were made on that basis, and the tracks were not replaced until the second trial.

The defence stated in court that there was evidence and then there was a track, which was not matched. At first instance, he reported Wang Chi and Liu Chi to the public security organs under their real names, allegedly for obstructing testimony, referring to the meeting with Lungguchi.

Many contradictions remain in the new testimony.

In his statement of 6 May, Wang-gi said that the afternoon was “I, Kang-choi, Liu-gi”, and that there was no Wang-gi. Twenty days later, on May 26, Wang appeared at the tea shop and added a section: Kang-choo offered to show Wang-gi some chat records to prove that he was a “white glove”, that “the King was there one day”, and Kang-choi said “Tell us that I can do anything if I want to do anything”.

The defence notes that the two transcripts vary considerably between 20 days, and that the 6 May note clearly states that no such matter was ever discussed. The other one is not: on May 26, there was no match in Wang's statement. By some way, Kang-chi was in front of Wang-i-i-i-n, who was in front of him, who said, "Nothing can be done." “There is no evidence of this. The blogger adds:

There's another time difference. He and Wang-i-i were face-to-face with a hype when he went to work in Jinan on 29 September

1. The defence meant that if the two had already met at the tea house on 8 September and had been introduced to each other, why did the letter not come out after more than 20 days? Another line in the testimony of Cheon and Blue Chi spoke about promotions in Lungbong, but Blue Chi never reached the Lungbong from the time of the crime to the first trial.

According to Liu Chiu ' s testimony, tea was taken by Chiu Chiu, Kang Chi, Wang Chi and Yao Chi to the shop at around 16 p.m. on 8 September. The defence court stated that the car records showed Kang driving from 2 p.m. to 6.14 p.m. that day. He asked: "How can people drink tea when they are here, when the car is there?" Liu Chi also admitted that the store had surveillance, but that it was “battered”.

Yao Yao-chi's testimony stated that he arrived at the shop around 7 p.m. and that Kang had returned from outside for dinner after half an hour. The defence had made a check: after dinner at 7:30, it did not match the record of having dinner at 9 p.m. the same day. Yao-i also said, “I don't care what they specifically talk about, so listen to it”.

The record of Wang-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i In his previous statement, he said that the first time he talked to Kang was in October; The new testimony was changed to September, explaining that it was “mistaken by then”. The defence argued that this change would have invalidated all of the evidence in the defence's hands that “not in October”.

There are many inherent contradictions, and the defence has assessed this testimony as “simplifiable”. His suggestion was that the case should focus on the examination of objective evidence rather than on such evidence.

Liu Xiao's in the Dragon-Pun, he runs the Fukuon Tea Club. According to local sources, he had a very close relationship with some of the police officers and the connection between Wang and Kang was also through him. In May this year, Liu Chia and Yao were detained by the Lungguchi police for their involvement in other crimes (allegedly suspected of being a bad influence) and the case is reportedly being investigated in the direction of the Quantico Parade.

This suspicion was raised by the defence counsel at the first instance, asking whether there was any improper interaction between Liu and the police officers who had been involved in the case.

In the first instance, the defense read several tweets about Wang and Blue and Chi. On 18 August 2025, two days before the case was opened, a case officer and Wang One came to Qingdao and met with Blue Chi. Another record shows that Wang had dinner with the officer in charge of the police station in Lungo City. Another is that investigators send an electronic template to Wang Chi for the interview notes, which Wang Chi and Blue Chi fill in.

The defence then argued that the relationship between the case officer and the reporting party was beyond normal. The first instance prosecutor responded that the fact that the police chief was eating with the client did not necessarily lead to the case being brought in breach of the law.

As for the track that the prosecutor had transferred, the defence believed that the two matters had been confused. Kang-i received the money on 9 November, and from 10 to 13 November, he entered the house at the Dragon Gate, after which he “was paid, and it was necessary for me to make up the reasons for lying to you”. (a) The trajectory from 4 to 19 September, which ends on 19 September; Kang-cho did not come to the Lung-gui until 1 October, when the curriculum vitae was received.

The defence put both of these Thongs into the elements of fraud, which were not correct. After the receipt of money on that occasion, from 10 to 13 November, $500,000 was surrendered, which was not matched by false statements and the delivery of property. On that occasion, from 4 to 19 September, according to new testimony, Wang should have been present and the tea shop was still sitting in Kang, Liu and Yao-chi; But the card records of the day showed that Kang was driving elsewhere in Lungbong and that section was not matched by the card records.

The defense asked the court: “Where did you get jurisdiction from the 19th of September? The blogger adds:

(a) The consumption records submitted by the defence, which the second trial prosecutor still questioned whether the micro-intellectual account number was in use by Kang himself and was not supported by evidence; The manner of access also does not meet the requirements of criminal evidence. The defense responded that the costs of the phone were only his, "I have to prove that I use the phone. Isn't that the logic of "prove my mother's mother"?

But the smoke-tai city prosecutor himself did not say anything. He explains that the trajectories taken by the public security organs and the consumption records submitted by the defence are now isolated evidence that “it is not possible to establish his whereabouts and what he is doing solely on the basis of the action or consumption records” and that further verification is required.

. The prosecutor expressly stated that bribery should be confiscated

The defence posted Wang's micro-credit records during the investigation phase of the court. These records suggest that the man who cheated Blue One might be Wang One.

The three previously cited articles, “also a leader”, “all his men” “more than the officers of the SOS Soviet Bureau”, were sent four days before the meeting in Shanghai.

There's another one after the Shanghai meeting. Blue One has learned from Kang-chi, and Wang has returned in his tweets: "Why don't you ask his uncle?" "Blanche said, "As you say, the Sioux program, it's better to coordinate with Sioux." The blogger adds:

The defence was present against the timeline. On November 5, 2024, Wang and Blue Chi said that they had received 1.75 million yuan from Blue Chi before the introduction. The money was meant for Sioux-Chi, but the matter was not done, and the money required an explanation. The defense's original saying was that Wang-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-i-

The defence argued that if Kang had created a true identity, the statement should have been passed from Kang to the King and passed from King to Blue Toge as it was. The situation is that Kang-chi's words were not there at all, and Blue-gi heard them from Wang-gi.

There was a line in the previous story that the man who cheated on Blue was more like Wang. And if you push it down, it's probably Wang himself who was tricked by the so-called "Soviet" in Beijing. The latter is merely an inference, and there is no evidence to date.

We have verified that the SRB did have a previous position in a core department of the State Council, that it had withdrawn from the second line of contact with Blue Zi and Wang, and that it was not known whether it had been investigated at the time.

The defence ' s statement that Kang-chi did not mislead Blue Sie was not presented by the prosecutor, who presented his own explanation.

She said that Blue One had a great deal of confidence in Wang-gi, that the whole promotion was coordinated by Wang-hee, who had given him much of his information and had made him “logical”.

The second trial of the Public Prosecutor ' s Office of the City of Smoke City concluded that the 500,000 yuan was the money used by the victim for the purpose of the offence and that the State Treasury was liable to confiscation and surrender, in accordance with article 64 of the Criminal Code; The first instance judgement was not dealt with in accordance with the law and was an omission.

Accordingly, the Inspector recommends that this part be remitted to the trial together, to determine in detail whether the 500,000 yuan was actually for unlawful purposes. “If an undue advantage is achieved for an unlawful purpose, such as bribery, we believe that this part of the money should be subject to confiscation and surrender to the public treasury. The blogger adds:

According to this statement, the movement and location of the $500,000 must be re-examined.

Our previous report that Kang has filed a case with the Qingdao City Supervisory Commission first reported to the Qingdao City Supervisory Board about the alleged purchaser of Blue Chi, and Wang, who is suspected of bribery, and that the transfer of 500,000 yuan to the Board was not dealt with in accordance with the law and has not received a response; He then handed over $500,000 to the investigative authorities, which did not return to Blue Chi, but instead to Wang Chi.

The Inspector also referred to a particular detail that had not been made public before: of the $500,000 in the case, a portion was owed by Wang. Of the $500,000, $400,000 was raised by Wang from the company account, $100,000 was in Blue Chi's own cash and gifts were taken by Wang from the company.

According to the testimony read at first instance, on the day of the meeting in Shanghai, Kang-i-i-in-law told Ban-i-i-ji that he was a businessman and could ask him and think about it; It is difficult to prove that Ginger or his father-in-law has overestimated his identity and abilities in the Blue — a comparison with the crime of fraud under the criminal law that has been extremely difficult to establish.

The problem is that if the $500,000 is Blue Chi's money to run, it's not “swindled money” from the beginning. The first instance court returned it to the person who had been given it, which amounted to returning a sum that might have been bribed to the party who had been given it.

In December 2024, Kang told Len Chiu that the chairman's position was not possible and that the reason was not. Blue Chi didn't withdraw the refund. On 12 December of the same year, he also consulted with Kang in Weshin and, while a leader of the city of Qingshima participated in the Central Economic Work Conference in Beijing to help communicate, he sent to Kang-choe the same day the names of the two-star group's nominees for the Deputy Secretary of the Party Commission.

After spring 2025, things did not improve, and relations turned to confrontation. On July 15th, Blue Chi took the Wisno of Kang and Blue Chissy's wife to the reply, "We have no direct money to make, you have to talk to Wang." The blogger adds:

Kang-chi's wife told us that when the source communicated, he suggested that they should pay at least $1.5 million to 1.6 million to put an end to this.

Thus, at first instance, the defence gave its own judgement: the essence of the case was that of the criminal settlement of civil debt by means of a financial chain, after the failure of the senior officer of Bluesome, Wang, or Wang, was so tight.

This matter was not raised in this second instance. The defence concluded its debate by stating that he did not wish to remand the second trial: “We do not want the second trial to be remanded, and we hope that the second trial will directly revise the appellant's innocence. The blogger adds:

None of the four witnesses requested by the defence appeared. Liu Chia and Yao, who are involved in some other crime, are then held in criminal detention; The written testimony that the two men left behind in May this year was read out during the trial.

After our previous reports, Blue Sage complained repeatedly on the back of the public, on the grounds that the articles concerned privacy and the right to portraits, and several complaints were dismissed.

It was understood at the time that the Qingdao City Disciplinary Commission had referred the information of Blue Sigi to the Qingdao National Investment Commission for verification, which tended to qualify as disciplinary and to impose internal sanctions. At this hearing, the trial attorney advocated the confiscation and surrender of the $500,000 to the State Treasury, saying that “improper interests are achieved for illegal purposes such as bribery”.

On the same line, the Aoshima side has been deferring to disciplinary action and the smoke prosecutor is speaking of bribery this time. No further information has been received from the Qingdao National Resource Commission (QNRC) on whether this attitude may be reconsidered.

The viewers expressed the hope that the next case would be properly dealt with on the rule of law track, saying that the relevant judicial authorities should not become “back to back” or even “hawks” of corruption suspects.

Previous recommendations

>In a death sentence case in the dormitory building of the West Shore Province Provincial Court, the client was called for 40 years (i) The Shandong Lungkushi case: 2 million "buyers" cannot be arrested by the police. The 150 million-dollar outer wall renovation project in the Xiaoshan settlement in Hangzhou