Why not a stabbing to break the law? Chang Chang rewords the judicial scale of "A life-guarding family."

There are two things in the world that are the most deceptive. One is the evil who enters your house indiscriminately, and the other is a ruler of the weak who go against them.

In the past, there have been many cases of blood-scathing, and the scenes of bad and bad are repeated:

The perpetrators of the crime committed violence indiscriminately, while the rebels became criminals and prisoners for “daunting” them.

Thus, when the Qindu District Court of Xianyang City, Xianxi Province, assumed a strong judicial role, and acquitted Zhang Chang of the assassination of the rapist, it quickly won the whole web.

In April 2023, more than 10 demolition agents in the Xingxiang Xinhua district of Shaanxi Province broke into Zhang ' s house illegally, breaking water, breaking doors, shooting fire with fire extinguishers and entering with weapons;

The Chang father and son stand up against the rapists with their own spears; In the process, Zhang Zhang stabbed a tear-squareer with a spear.

As always. Zhang Chang was arrested for stabbing the rapist, the prosecutor's office prosecuted him for “intentional assault”, and the relatives of the rapist filed a large claim of $2.6 million.

As if breaking the doors, violent breaking of the houses, and the innocent, and self-defense, and the desperate death of the land, were guilty;

As if the power of power was so unjust that the people were so protective.

Zhang Chang would face a rather long prison sentence if not unexpectedly; He will be labelled as a “crime” for life, like many who resist the demolition.

But this time, the "unforeseen" came.

The Qindu District Court noted that Zhang Chang was responding to the legitimate rights and interests of his family and his family, in keeping with the general public ' s general awareness and as a legitimate defence.

This judgement may be the “situation No. 1” of the acquittal of the dispossessed persons after their death and injury as a result of the civil resistance to the illegal demolition.

This is not an ordinary case of innocence, but a landmark case that has marked the social bottom line and re-created the justice paradigm, following the Kunshan Anti-Kill.

It makes it clear that there is no trespassing in the private sphere, no usurping of homes and no bullying of the weak.

Let's be clear: from today on, who will be the next to be the one to be forced to do it illegally and violently?

Chang's jurisprudence reminds me of the case of Yangzhou's owner who was killed and injured several years ago in a car crash on a man who was being raped.

The same is true of the demolition and the defence of the home, but the owner of the Yangzhou State, Hue Gang, did not wait until “an accident”:

His 15-year sentence is now just over half.

In October 2018, hundreds of demolition workers raided houses in Hanggung Town, in Huehon County, by cutting off power, destroying surveillance, breaking doors, carrying goods and mechanical work.

When Wei arrived, he clashed with the breakers, and the telephone and the door calls were unsuccessful, and Wei was attacked and kicked by the breakers.

Eventually, Wei just drove into the demolition team, killing two and wounding eight of the breakers.

At that time, the defence of “self-defence” was similarly presented by Wegang, lawyer Zhu Xiaohyeong, a lawyer at the Bar Office of Jae Liang, Beijing City, but was not accepted by the judiciary.

Hue was convicted of “hazardous crimes against public safety” and sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment.

In his judgment, the Yangzhou Court said that the rule of law was a necessary requirement of civilized society and that private revenge must be abandoned...

How does Zhang Chang and Wei Gung act differently? It's all the Piggy nature.

But the judicial authorities of the canton of Jan, which have only been very high in legal instruments, have demanded that Hueh Gang “renounce private revenge” but have admitted in a few ways that:

Those murderers, they shouldn't have stepped in.

Sometimes, the law is used to insinuating the weak and the victims to give up, but rarely asks:

Why do the perpetrators of such crimes dare to act with impunity and speed? Why do law-abiding people always have to stand by and stand by and die?

We sincerely hope that the judgement of Shaanxi Xianyang, “The innocence of the stabbing of the breakaway”, will shed light on the law in a confused world.

These simple arguments should be repeated:

Your home is an inviolable barrier. Your life is the bottom line of the line of no violation.

The best look in the world is never the bottomless retreat of ordinary people in the face of illegal violence, but rather the punishment, the kindness and the protection of the world.

May in the Hereafter everyone live in peace, and there is no need to guard his place with flesh and blood.

And the balance of law will always be inclined towards the weak, so that the guards will not be wronged, and those who commit evil will be punished.

The original information

Headline: Zhang Chang was acquitted of the assassination of the rapist and 15 years of imprisonment for the crashing of the rapist Wei Gang.

Source: Weibo Commons, “Tatiya Review”